Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction—Analytical Approach

Modelling of water flow in the hyporheic zone and calculations of water exchange between groundwater and surface waters are important issues in modern environmental research. The article presents the Analytical Hyporheic Flux approach (AHF) permitting calculation of the amount of water exchange in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marek Nawalany, Grzegorz Sinicyn, Maria Grodzka-Łukaszewska, Dorota Mirosław-Świątek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/6/1792
id doaj-35e9fafc3e014d0495ec59fa08b02af9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35e9fafc3e014d0495ec59fa08b02af92020-11-25T03:27:55ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-06-01121792179210.3390/w12061792Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction—Analytical ApproachMarek Nawalany0Grzegorz Sinicyn1Maria Grodzka-Łukaszewska2Dorota Mirosław-Świątek3Faculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 00-653 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 00-653 Warsaw, PolandFaculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, 00-653 Warsaw, PolandInstitute of Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences–SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, PolandModelling of water flow in the hyporheic zone and calculations of water exchange between groundwater and surface waters are important issues in modern environmental research. The article presents the Analytical Hyporheic Flux approach (AHF) permitting calculation of the amount of water exchange in the hyporheic zone, including vertical water seepage through the streambed and horizontal seepage through river banks. The outcome of the model, namely water fluxes, is compared with the corresponding results from the numerical model SEEP2D and simple Darcy-type model. The errors of the AHF model, in a range of 11–16%, depend on the aspect ratio of water depth to river width, and the direction of the river–aquifer water exchange, i.e., drainage or infiltration. The AHF model errors are significantly lower compared to the often-used model based on vertical water seepage through the streambed described by Darcy's law.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/6/1792groundwater–surface water interactionanalytical model AHFnumerical model SEEP2D
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marek Nawalany
Grzegorz Sinicyn
Maria Grodzka-Łukaszewska
Dorota Mirosław-Świątek
spellingShingle Marek Nawalany
Grzegorz Sinicyn
Maria Grodzka-Łukaszewska
Dorota Mirosław-Świątek
Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction—Analytical Approach
Water
groundwater–surface water interaction
analytical model AHF
numerical model SEEP2D
author_facet Marek Nawalany
Grzegorz Sinicyn
Maria Grodzka-Łukaszewska
Dorota Mirosław-Świątek
author_sort Marek Nawalany
title Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction—Analytical Approach
title_short Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction—Analytical Approach
title_full Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction—Analytical Approach
title_fullStr Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction—Analytical Approach
title_full_unstemmed Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction—Analytical Approach
title_sort groundwater–surface water interaction—analytical approach
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Modelling of water flow in the hyporheic zone and calculations of water exchange between groundwater and surface waters are important issues in modern environmental research. The article presents the Analytical Hyporheic Flux approach (AHF) permitting calculation of the amount of water exchange in the hyporheic zone, including vertical water seepage through the streambed and horizontal seepage through river banks. The outcome of the model, namely water fluxes, is compared with the corresponding results from the numerical model SEEP2D and simple Darcy-type model. The errors of the AHF model, in a range of 11–16%, depend on the aspect ratio of water depth to river width, and the direction of the river–aquifer water exchange, i.e., drainage or infiltration. The AHF model errors are significantly lower compared to the often-used model based on vertical water seepage through the streambed described by Darcy's law.
topic groundwater–surface water interaction
analytical model AHF
numerical model SEEP2D
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/6/1792
work_keys_str_mv AT mareknawalany groundwatersurfacewaterinteractionanalyticalapproach
AT grzegorzsinicyn groundwatersurfacewaterinteractionanalyticalapproach
AT mariagrodzkałukaszewska groundwatersurfacewaterinteractionanalyticalapproach
AT dorotamirosławswiatek groundwatersurfacewaterinteractionanalyticalapproach
_version_ 1724586421673525248