Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages

Objective: The economic evaluation of the drug olaratumab is carried out in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Method: The data were analyzed following the recommendations contained in the MADRE program of the GENESIS-SEFH report model. Results: Progression free survival and overall survival r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Carlos del Río-Valencia, Rocío Asensi-Díez, M.ª Dolores Fraga-Fuentes, Ana Clopés-Estela, Lorenzo Villalobos-Torres
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Grupo Aula Médica 2018-09-01
Series:Farmacia Hospitalaria
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/10917.pdf
id doaj-3600078b470047499ef6eb85f564fd2f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3600078b470047499ef6eb85f564fd2f2020-11-25T02:27:08ZengGrupo Aula MédicaFarmacia Hospitalaria1130-63432171-86952018-09-01420520421110.7399/fh.10917Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stagesJuan Carlos del Río-Valencia0Rocío Asensi-Díez1M.ª Dolores Fraga-Fuentes2Ana Clopés-Estela3Lorenzo Villalobos-Torres4Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, MálagaServicio de Farmacia, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, MálagaServicio de Farmacia, Complejo Hospitalario Mancha Centro, Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad RealHospital Duran I Reynals, Institut Catalá D´Oncología, Hospitalet, BarcelonaServicio de Farmacia, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, MálagaObjective: The economic evaluation of the drug olaratumab is carried out in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Method: The data were analyzed following the recommendations contained in the MADRE program of the GENESIS-SEFH report model. Results: Progression free survival and overall survival results published in the pivotal clinical trial; Tap, WD. et al. (2016) were improvement of 2.5 months in median progression free survival (primary endpoint) HR = 0.672; IC95% (0.442-1.021) and gain of 11.8 months in median OS (secondary endpoint) HR = 0.463; IC95% (0.301-0.710). A cost-effectiveness analyses was performed considering 2 scenarios; scenario 1: with use of whole vials and scenario 2: use of whole vials and associating non-pharmacological costs (day hospital visits, mucositis, neutropenia and dexrazoxane use). In both cases we considered the cost of drugs and the efficacy data of the pivotal clinical trial. In Scenario 1, we would have an Incremental-Cost-Effectiveness-Ratio of €28,443.81/month of progression-free survival and €72,560.74 per year of life gained and in scenario 2 we would have an incremental-cost-effectivenessratio of €30,879.79/ progression-free survival and €78,774.99/ year of life gained. The budgetary impact of this drug would range from €61,759.592 to €92,639.388 estimated to be 800 to 1,200 patients likely to receive treatment in Spain. Conclusions: Olaratumab is a drug that provides a significant benefit in overall survival but not in progression free survival. To be used in soft tissue sarcoma and to be cost-effective, the acquisition cost of the 500 mg vial should be between €101.91 and €506.54 and that of the 190 mg vial between €39.31 and €195.37. http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/10917.pdfOlaratumabSoft tissue sarcomaCost-effectiveness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juan Carlos del Río-Valencia
Rocío Asensi-Díez
M.ª Dolores Fraga-Fuentes
Ana Clopés-Estela
Lorenzo Villalobos-Torres
spellingShingle Juan Carlos del Río-Valencia
Rocío Asensi-Díez
M.ª Dolores Fraga-Fuentes
Ana Clopés-Estela
Lorenzo Villalobos-Torres
Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages
Farmacia Hospitalaria
Olaratumab
Soft tissue sarcoma
Cost-effectiveness
author_facet Juan Carlos del Río-Valencia
Rocío Asensi-Díez
M.ª Dolores Fraga-Fuentes
Ana Clopés-Estela
Lorenzo Villalobos-Torres
author_sort Juan Carlos del Río-Valencia
title Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages
title_short Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages
title_full Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of the GENESIS-SEFH report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages
title_sort economic evaluation of the genesis-sefh report of olaratumab with doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcoma in advanced stages
publisher Grupo Aula Médica
series Farmacia Hospitalaria
issn 1130-6343
2171-8695
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Objective: The economic evaluation of the drug olaratumab is carried out in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Method: The data were analyzed following the recommendations contained in the MADRE program of the GENESIS-SEFH report model. Results: Progression free survival and overall survival results published in the pivotal clinical trial; Tap, WD. et al. (2016) were improvement of 2.5 months in median progression free survival (primary endpoint) HR = 0.672; IC95% (0.442-1.021) and gain of 11.8 months in median OS (secondary endpoint) HR = 0.463; IC95% (0.301-0.710). A cost-effectiveness analyses was performed considering 2 scenarios; scenario 1: with use of whole vials and scenario 2: use of whole vials and associating non-pharmacological costs (day hospital visits, mucositis, neutropenia and dexrazoxane use). In both cases we considered the cost of drugs and the efficacy data of the pivotal clinical trial. In Scenario 1, we would have an Incremental-Cost-Effectiveness-Ratio of €28,443.81/month of progression-free survival and €72,560.74 per year of life gained and in scenario 2 we would have an incremental-cost-effectivenessratio of €30,879.79/ progression-free survival and €78,774.99/ year of life gained. The budgetary impact of this drug would range from €61,759.592 to €92,639.388 estimated to be 800 to 1,200 patients likely to receive treatment in Spain. Conclusions: Olaratumab is a drug that provides a significant benefit in overall survival but not in progression free survival. To be used in soft tissue sarcoma and to be cost-effective, the acquisition cost of the 500 mg vial should be between €101.91 and €506.54 and that of the 190 mg vial between €39.31 and €195.37.
topic Olaratumab
Soft tissue sarcoma
Cost-effectiveness
url http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/10917.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT juancarlosdelriovalencia economicevaluationofthegenesissefhreportofolaratumabwithdoxorubicininsofttissuesarcomainadvancedstages
AT rocioasensidiez economicevaluationofthegenesissefhreportofolaratumabwithdoxorubicininsofttissuesarcomainadvancedstages
AT madoloresfragafuentes economicevaluationofthegenesissefhreportofolaratumabwithdoxorubicininsofttissuesarcomainadvancedstages
AT anaclopesestela economicevaluationofthegenesissefhreportofolaratumabwithdoxorubicininsofttissuesarcomainadvancedstages
AT lorenzovillalobostorres economicevaluationofthegenesissefhreportofolaratumabwithdoxorubicininsofttissuesarcomainadvancedstages
_version_ 1724844085622079488