When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise

Perceptual load and cognitive load can be separately manipulated and dissociated in their effects on speech understanding in noise. The Ease of Language Understanding model assumes a theoretical position where perceptual task characteristics interact with the individual′s implicit capacities to extr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jerker Ronnberg, Mary Rudner, Thomas Lunner, Adriana A Zekveld
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Noise and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2010;volume=12;issue=49;spage=263;epage=269;aulast=Ronnberg
id doaj-3634d4f3e4d14554b1842b39af035273
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3634d4f3e4d14554b1842b39af0352732020-11-24T22:16:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsNoise and Health1463-17411998-40302010-01-01124926326910.4103/1463-1741.70505When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noiseJerker RonnbergMary RudnerThomas LunnerAdriana A ZekveldPerceptual load and cognitive load can be separately manipulated and dissociated in their effects on speech understanding in noise. The Ease of Language Understanding model assumes a theoretical position where perceptual task characteristics interact with the individual′s implicit capacities to extract the phonological elements of speech. Phonological precision and speed of lexical access are important determinants for listening in adverse conditions. If there are mismatches between the phonological elements perceived and phonological representations in long-term memory, explicit working memory (WM)-related capacities will be continually invoked to reconstruct and infer the contents of the ongoing discourse. Whether this induces a high cognitive load or not will in turn depend on the individual′s storage and processing capacities in WM. Data suggest that modulated noise maskers may serve as triggers for speech maskers and therefore induce a WM, explicit mode of processing. Individuals with high WM capacity benefit more than low WM-capacity individuals from fast amplitude compression at low or negative input speech-to-noise ratios. The general conclusion is that there is an overarching interaction between the focal purpose of processing in the primary listening task and the extent to which a secondary, distracting task taps into these processes.http://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2010;volume=12;issue=49;spage=263;epage=269;aulast=Ronnberg Competing noiseease of language understandingmaskingspeech understandingworking memory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jerker Ronnberg
Mary Rudner
Thomas Lunner
Adriana A Zekveld
spellingShingle Jerker Ronnberg
Mary Rudner
Thomas Lunner
Adriana A Zekveld
When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise
Noise and Health
Competing noise
ease of language understanding
masking
speech understanding
working memory
author_facet Jerker Ronnberg
Mary Rudner
Thomas Lunner
Adriana A Zekveld
author_sort Jerker Ronnberg
title When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise
title_short When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise
title_full When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise
title_fullStr When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise
title_full_unstemmed When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise
title_sort when cognition kicks in: working memory and speech understanding in noise
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Noise and Health
issn 1463-1741
1998-4030
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Perceptual load and cognitive load can be separately manipulated and dissociated in their effects on speech understanding in noise. The Ease of Language Understanding model assumes a theoretical position where perceptual task characteristics interact with the individual′s implicit capacities to extract the phonological elements of speech. Phonological precision and speed of lexical access are important determinants for listening in adverse conditions. If there are mismatches between the phonological elements perceived and phonological representations in long-term memory, explicit working memory (WM)-related capacities will be continually invoked to reconstruct and infer the contents of the ongoing discourse. Whether this induces a high cognitive load or not will in turn depend on the individual′s storage and processing capacities in WM. Data suggest that modulated noise maskers may serve as triggers for speech maskers and therefore induce a WM, explicit mode of processing. Individuals with high WM capacity benefit more than low WM-capacity individuals from fast amplitude compression at low or negative input speech-to-noise ratios. The general conclusion is that there is an overarching interaction between the focal purpose of processing in the primary listening task and the extent to which a secondary, distracting task taps into these processes.
topic Competing noise
ease of language understanding
masking
speech understanding
working memory
url http://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2010;volume=12;issue=49;spage=263;epage=269;aulast=Ronnberg
work_keys_str_mv AT jerkerronnberg whencognitionkicksinworkingmemoryandspeechunderstandinginnoise
AT maryrudner whencognitionkicksinworkingmemoryandspeechunderstandinginnoise
AT thomaslunner whencognitionkicksinworkingmemoryandspeechunderstandinginnoise
AT adrianaazekveld whencognitionkicksinworkingmemoryandspeechunderstandinginnoise
_version_ 1725787901819617280