Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intervention directed at three levels (clinic, provider, patient) in a primary care setting. Method: We conducted a group randomized trial (Clinical Trials registration no. NCT01568151) among 10 primary care clinics in Colum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jessica L. Krok-Schoen, Gregory S. Young, Michael L. Pennell, Paul L. Reiter, Mira L. Katz, Douglas M. Post, Cathy M. Tatum, Electra D. Paskett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-01-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335515000479
id doaj-367414cb5c154524ad4c615aa5cb7bc9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-367414cb5c154524ad4c615aa5cb7bc92020-11-25T02:12:00ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552015-01-012C30631310.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.010Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screeningJessica L. Krok-Schoen0Gregory S. Young1Michael L. Pennell2Paul L. Reiter3Mira L. Katz4Douglas M. Post5Cathy M. Tatum6Electra D. Paskett7Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 1590 N. High St., Suite 525, Columbus, OH 43201, USACenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, 2012 Kenny Rd., Columbus, OH 43221, USADivision of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USAComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 1590 N. High St., Suite 525, Columbus, OH 43201, USAComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 1590 N. High St., Suite 525, Columbus, OH 43201, USAComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 1590 N. High St., Suite 525, Columbus, OH 43201, USAComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 1590 N. High St., Suite 525, Columbus, OH 43201, USAComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, 1590 N. High St., Suite 525, Columbus, OH 43201, USAObjective: To test the effectiveness of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intervention directed at three levels (clinic, provider, patient) in a primary care setting. Method: We conducted a group randomized trial (Clinical Trials registration no. NCT01568151) among 10 primary care clinics in Columbus, Ohio that were randomized to a study condition (intervention or usual care). We determined the effect of a multi-level, stepped behavioral intervention on receipt of a CRC screening test among average-risk patients from these clinics over the study period. Results: Patients (n = 527) who were outside of CRC screening recommendations were recruited. Overall, 35.4% of participants in the intervention clinics had received CRC screening by the end of the study compared to 35.1% of participants who were in the usual care clinics. Time to CRC screening was also similar across arms (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.65–1.45). Conclusion: The multi-level intervention was not effective in increasing CRC screening among participants who needed a test, perhaps due to low participation of patients in the stepped intervention. Future studies utilizing evidence-based strategies to encourage CRC screening are needed.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335515000479Cancer preventionCancer screeningMulti-level interventionsColorectal cancerLay health advisor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jessica L. Krok-Schoen
Gregory S. Young
Michael L. Pennell
Paul L. Reiter
Mira L. Katz
Douglas M. Post
Cathy M. Tatum
Electra D. Paskett
spellingShingle Jessica L. Krok-Schoen
Gregory S. Young
Michael L. Pennell
Paul L. Reiter
Mira L. Katz
Douglas M. Post
Cathy M. Tatum
Electra D. Paskett
Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening
Preventive Medicine Reports
Cancer prevention
Cancer screening
Multi-level interventions
Colorectal cancer
Lay health advisor
author_facet Jessica L. Krok-Schoen
Gregory S. Young
Michael L. Pennell
Paul L. Reiter
Mira L. Katz
Douglas M. Post
Cathy M. Tatum
Electra D. Paskett
author_sort Jessica L. Krok-Schoen
title Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening
title_short Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening
title_full Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening
title_fullStr Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening
title_sort testing interventions to motivate and educate (time): a multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening
publisher Elsevier
series Preventive Medicine Reports
issn 2211-3355
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Objective: To test the effectiveness of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intervention directed at three levels (clinic, provider, patient) in a primary care setting. Method: We conducted a group randomized trial (Clinical Trials registration no. NCT01568151) among 10 primary care clinics in Columbus, Ohio that were randomized to a study condition (intervention or usual care). We determined the effect of a multi-level, stepped behavioral intervention on receipt of a CRC screening test among average-risk patients from these clinics over the study period. Results: Patients (n = 527) who were outside of CRC screening recommendations were recruited. Overall, 35.4% of participants in the intervention clinics had received CRC screening by the end of the study compared to 35.1% of participants who were in the usual care clinics. Time to CRC screening was also similar across arms (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.65–1.45). Conclusion: The multi-level intervention was not effective in increasing CRC screening among participants who needed a test, perhaps due to low participation of patients in the stepped intervention. Future studies utilizing evidence-based strategies to encourage CRC screening are needed.
topic Cancer prevention
Cancer screening
Multi-level interventions
Colorectal cancer
Lay health advisor
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335515000479
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicalkrokschoen testinginterventionstomotivateandeducatetimeamultilevelinterventiontoimprovecolorectalcancerscreening
AT gregorysyoung testinginterventionstomotivateandeducatetimeamultilevelinterventiontoimprovecolorectalcancerscreening
AT michaellpennell testinginterventionstomotivateandeducatetimeamultilevelinterventiontoimprovecolorectalcancerscreening
AT paullreiter testinginterventionstomotivateandeducatetimeamultilevelinterventiontoimprovecolorectalcancerscreening
AT miralkatz testinginterventionstomotivateandeducatetimeamultilevelinterventiontoimprovecolorectalcancerscreening
AT douglasmpost testinginterventionstomotivateandeducatetimeamultilevelinterventiontoimprovecolorectalcancerscreening
AT cathymtatum testinginterventionstomotivateandeducatetimeamultilevelinterventiontoimprovecolorectalcancerscreening
AT electradpaskett testinginterventionstomotivateandeducatetimeamultilevelinterventiontoimprovecolorectalcancerscreening
_version_ 1724911271466237952