Exclusion of the scientific expert evidence (low epistemic quality) in the admissibility in criminal proceedings of civil law tradition: Dialogue between two legal cultures
In this paper we analyze the exclusion criteria of scientific expert evidence of low epistemic reliability from two different legal cultures: common law and civil law. We develop the relationship between both groups of criteria to argue that the Daubert criteria may be applicable in civil law when d...
Main Author: | Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/498 |
Similar Items
-
Técnicas neurocientíficas como medio de prueba pericial
by: Fernando Luna Salas
Published: (2019-01-01) -
La prueba de razonabilidad y la estabilidad de las reglas de juego
by: María M. Cuéllar
Published: (2005-06-01) -
La prueba de razonabilidad y la estabilidad de las reglas de juego
by: Cuéllar , María Merdeces
Published: (2005-06-01) -
CONFIGURACIÓN DE LA PRUEBA PERICIAL EN EL PROCESO
PENAL COLOMBIANO
by: José María Peláez Mejía, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
ADMISIBILIDAD DE LA PRUEBA PERICIAL EN SUDAMÉRICA
by: Naruska Tito Chura
Published: (2020-10-01)