Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz

Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz

This paper is a review of the book: Piotr Lichacz, O.P., Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? (Warszawa: Instytut Tomistyczny, 2010). According to the author, Lichacz’s book provides a comprehensive analysis of Thomas Aquinas’s anthropological and teleological methodology of phil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kaz Kukiela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Étienne Gilson Society 2020-09-01
Series:Studia Gilsoniana
Subjects:
aristotle
david hume
g. e. moore
piotr lichacz
thomas aquinas
naturalistic fallacy
normative
descriptive
is/ought
natural sciences
anthropology
ontology
teleology
ethics
human nature
Online Access:http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-8056ff2e-1ec1-4544-807c-435afe3d593d?q=bwmeta1.element.cejsh-f9a36699-90c9-4b9f-bea2-d6631be4a97a;4&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESS
id doaj-36990f16890a4433b187f17ac9c66815
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36990f16890a4433b187f17ac9c668152020-11-25T02:46:29ZengInternational Étienne Gilson SocietyStudia Gilsoniana2300-00662577-03142020-09-019349549810.26385/SG.090319Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr LichaczKaz KukielaThis paper is a review of the book: Piotr Lichacz, O.P., Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? (Warszawa: Instytut Tomistyczny, 2010). According to the author, Lichacz’s book provides a comprehensive analysis of Thomas Aquinas’s anthropological and teleological methodology of philosophy. Consequently, it develops a supervenient and normative characteristic of natural finality onto the description of the human being as discovered in the natural sciences.http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-8056ff2e-1ec1-4544-807c-435afe3d593d?q=bwmeta1.element.cejsh-f9a36699-90c9-4b9f-bea2-d6631be4a97a;4&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESSaristotledavid humeg. e. moorepiotr lichaczthomas aquinasnaturalistic fallacynormativedescriptiveis/oughtnatural sciencesanthropologyontologyteleologyethicshuman nature
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaz Kukiela
spellingShingle Kaz Kukiela
Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz
Studia Gilsoniana
aristotle
david hume
g. e. moore
piotr lichacz
thomas aquinas
naturalistic fallacy
normative
descriptive
is/ought
natural sciences
anthropology
ontology
teleology
ethics
human nature
author_facet Kaz Kukiela
author_sort Kaz Kukiela
title Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz
title_short Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz
title_full Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz
title_fullStr Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz
title_full_unstemmed Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz
title_sort did aquinas justify the transition from ‘is’ to ‘ought’? by piotr lichacz
publisher International Étienne Gilson Society
series Studia Gilsoniana
issn 2300-0066
2577-0314
publishDate 2020-09-01
description This paper is a review of the book: Piotr Lichacz, O.P., Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? (Warszawa: Instytut Tomistyczny, 2010). According to the author, Lichacz’s book provides a comprehensive analysis of Thomas Aquinas’s anthropological and teleological methodology of philosophy. Consequently, it develops a supervenient and normative characteristic of natural finality onto the description of the human being as discovered in the natural sciences.
topic aristotle
david hume
g. e. moore
piotr lichacz
thomas aquinas
naturalistic fallacy
normative
descriptive
is/ought
natural sciences
anthropology
ontology
teleology
ethics
human nature
url http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-8056ff2e-1ec1-4544-807c-435afe3d593d?q=bwmeta1.element.cejsh-f9a36699-90c9-4b9f-bea2-d6631be4a97a;4&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESS
work_keys_str_mv AT kazkukiela didaquinasjustifythetransitionfromistooughtbypiotrlichacz
_version_ 1724757896421441536

Similar Items