Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? by Piotr Lichacz
This paper is a review of the book: Piotr Lichacz, O.P., Did Aquinas Justify the Transition from ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’? (Warszawa: Instytut Tomistyczny, 2010). According to the author, Lichacz’s book provides a comprehensive analysis of Thomas Aquinas’s anthropological and teleological methodology of phil...
Main Author: | Kaz Kukiela |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Étienne Gilson Society
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Studia Gilsoniana |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-8056ff2e-1ec1-4544-807c-435afe3d593d?q=bwmeta1.element.cejsh-f9a36699-90c9-4b9f-bea2-d6631be4a97a;4&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESS |
Similar Items
-
How (not) to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences
by: Katinka JP Quintelier, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01) -
Duties, Oughts and Jesse Prinz’s Agent-Relativism
by: Marco Antônio Oliveira de Azevedo
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Catholicism and the Natural Law: A Response to Four Misunderstandings
by: Francis J. Beckwith
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Emergence and Downward Causation Reconsidered in Terms of the Aristotelian-Thomistic View of Causation and Divine Action
by: Mariusz Tabaczek
Published: (2016-04-01) -
Argument z důsledku a jeho varianty (Argument from Consequences and its variants)
by: Martina Juříková
Published: (2016-03-01)