Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have offered hope for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). However, their efficiency with smear-negative samples has not been widely studied in low income settings. Here, we evaluated in-hous...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Research Notes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/5/487 |
id |
doaj-369c883c85e64d25824ce0832efb0ece |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-369c883c85e64d25824ce0832efb0ece2020-11-25T02:16:16ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002012-09-015148710.1186/1756-0500-5-487Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, UgandaNakiyingi LydiaKateete David POcama PonsianoWorodria WilliamSempa Joseph BAsiimwe Benon BKatabazi Fred AKatamba AchillesHuang LaurenceJoloba Moses LMayanja-Kizza Harriet<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have offered hope for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). However, their efficiency with smear-negative samples has not been widely studied in low income settings. Here, we evaluated in-house PCR assay for diagnosis of smear-negative TB using Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture as the baseline test. Two hundred and five pulmonary TB (PTB) suspects with smear-negative sputum samples, admitted on a short stay emergency ward at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda, were enrolled. Two smear-negative sputum samples were obtained from each PTB suspect and processed simultaneously for identification of MTBC using in-house PCR and LJ culture.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seventy two PTB suspects (35%, 72/205) were LJ culture positive while 128 (62.4%, 128/205) were PCR-positive. The sensitivity and specificity of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative PTB were 75% (95% CI 62.6-85.0) and 35.9% (95% CI 27.2-45.3), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 39% (95% CI 30.4-48.2) and 72.4% (95% CI 59.1-83.3), respectively, while the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.17 (95% CI 0.96-1.42) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.43-1.14), respectively. One hundred and seventeen LJ culture-negative suspects (75 PCR-positive and 42 PCR-negative) were enrolled for follow-up at 2 months. Of the PCR-positive suspects, 45 (60%, 45/75) were still alive, of whom 29 (64.4%, 29/45) returned for the follow-up visit; 15 (20%, 15/75) suspects died while another 15 (20%, 15/75) were lost to follow-up<b>.</b> Of the 42 PCR-negative suspects, 22 (52.4%, 22/42) were still alive, of whom 16 (72.7%, 16/22) returned for follow-up; 11 (26.2%, 11/42) died while nine (21.4%, 9/42) were lost to follow-up. Overall, more PCR-positive suspects were diagnosed with PTB during follow-up visits but the difference was not statistically significant (27.6%, 8/29 vs. 25%, 4/16, <it>p</it> = 0.9239). Furthermore, mortality was higher for the PCR-negative suspects but the difference was also not statistically significant (26.2% vs. 20% <it>p</it> = 0.7094).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In-house PCR correlates poorly with LJ culture for diagnosis of smear-negative PTB. Therefore, in-house PCR may not be adopted as an alternative to LJ culture.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/5/487Pulmonary tuberculosisSmear-negative TBHIV-infectedHIV-TB co-infectionCD4 cell countsNucleic acid amplification testsIn-house PCRLowenstein-Jensen cultureSensitivitySpecificityResource limited settings |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nakiyingi Lydia Kateete David P Ocama Ponsiano Worodria William Sempa Joseph B Asiimwe Benon B Katabazi Fred A Katamba Achilles Huang Laurence Joloba Moses L Mayanja-Kizza Harriet |
spellingShingle |
Nakiyingi Lydia Kateete David P Ocama Ponsiano Worodria William Sempa Joseph B Asiimwe Benon B Katabazi Fred A Katamba Achilles Huang Laurence Joloba Moses L Mayanja-Kizza Harriet Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda BMC Research Notes Pulmonary tuberculosis Smear-negative TB HIV-infected HIV-TB co-infection CD4 cell counts Nucleic acid amplification tests In-house PCR Lowenstein-Jensen culture Sensitivity Specificity Resource limited settings |
author_facet |
Nakiyingi Lydia Kateete David P Ocama Ponsiano Worodria William Sempa Joseph B Asiimwe Benon B Katabazi Fred A Katamba Achilles Huang Laurence Joloba Moses L Mayanja-Kizza Harriet |
author_sort |
Nakiyingi Lydia |
title |
Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda |
title_short |
Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda |
title_full |
Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in Kampala, Uganda |
title_sort |
evaluation of in-house pcr for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in kampala, uganda |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Research Notes |
issn |
1756-0500 |
publishDate |
2012-09-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have offered hope for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). However, their efficiency with smear-negative samples has not been widely studied in low income settings. Here, we evaluated in-house PCR assay for diagnosis of smear-negative TB using Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture as the baseline test. Two hundred and five pulmonary TB (PTB) suspects with smear-negative sputum samples, admitted on a short stay emergency ward at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda, were enrolled. Two smear-negative sputum samples were obtained from each PTB suspect and processed simultaneously for identification of MTBC using in-house PCR and LJ culture.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seventy two PTB suspects (35%, 72/205) were LJ culture positive while 128 (62.4%, 128/205) were PCR-positive. The sensitivity and specificity of in-house PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative PTB were 75% (95% CI 62.6-85.0) and 35.9% (95% CI 27.2-45.3), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 39% (95% CI 30.4-48.2) and 72.4% (95% CI 59.1-83.3), respectively, while the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.17 (95% CI 0.96-1.42) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.43-1.14), respectively. One hundred and seventeen LJ culture-negative suspects (75 PCR-positive and 42 PCR-negative) were enrolled for follow-up at 2 months. Of the PCR-positive suspects, 45 (60%, 45/75) were still alive, of whom 29 (64.4%, 29/45) returned for the follow-up visit; 15 (20%, 15/75) suspects died while another 15 (20%, 15/75) were lost to follow-up<b>.</b> Of the 42 PCR-negative suspects, 22 (52.4%, 22/42) were still alive, of whom 16 (72.7%, 16/22) returned for follow-up; 11 (26.2%, 11/42) died while nine (21.4%, 9/42) were lost to follow-up. Overall, more PCR-positive suspects were diagnosed with PTB during follow-up visits but the difference was not statistically significant (27.6%, 8/29 vs. 25%, 4/16, <it>p</it> = 0.9239). Furthermore, mortality was higher for the PCR-negative suspects but the difference was also not statistically significant (26.2% vs. 20% <it>p</it> = 0.7094).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In-house PCR correlates poorly with LJ culture for diagnosis of smear-negative PTB. Therefore, in-house PCR may not be adopted as an alternative to LJ culture.</p> |
topic |
Pulmonary tuberculosis Smear-negative TB HIV-infected HIV-TB co-infection CD4 cell counts Nucleic acid amplification tests In-house PCR Lowenstein-Jensen culture Sensitivity Specificity Resource limited settings |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/5/487 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nakiyingilydia evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT kateetedavidp evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT ocamaponsiano evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT worodriawilliam evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT sempajosephb evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT asiimwebenonb evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT katabazifreda evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT katambaachilles evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT huanglaurence evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT jolobamosesl evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda AT mayanjakizzaharriet evaluationofinhousepcrfordiagnosisofsmearnegativepulmonarytuberculosisinkampalauganda |
_version_ |
1724891600717348864 |