Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults

When viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Speci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ira Kurthen, Martin Meyer, Matthias Schlesewsky, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513/full
id doaj-36a165d78ddd4078958ba17eb82453d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36a165d78ddd4078958ba17eb82453d22020-11-25T01:53:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2020-10-011410.3389/fnins.2020.573513573513Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older AdultsIra Kurthen0Martin Meyer1Martin Meyer2Matthias Schlesewsky3Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky4Developmental Psychology: Infancy and Childhood, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandNeuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandCognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, AustriaCognitive and Systems Neuroscience Research Hub, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaCognitive and Systems Neuroscience Research Hub, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaWhen viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Specifically, we tested whether hearing thresholds, working memory, inhibition, and individual alpha frequency would predict event-related potential amplitudes in response to classic psycholinguistic manipulations at the sentence level. Twenty-nine healthy older adults (age range 61–76 years) listened to English sentences containing reduced relative clauses and object-relative clauses while their electroencephalogram was recorded. We found that hearing thresholds and working memory predicted P600 amplitudes early during reduced relative clause processing, while individual alpha frequency predicted P600 amplitudes at a later point in time. The results suggest that participants with better hearing and larger working memory capacity simultaneously activated both the preferred and the dispreferred interpretation of reduced relative clauses, while participants with worse hearing and smaller working memory capacity only activated the preferred interpretation. They also suggest that participants with a higher individual alpha frequency had a higher likelihood of successfully reanalysing the sentence toward the reduced relative clause reading than participants with a lower individual alpha frequency. By contrast, we found no relationship between object-relative clause processing and working memory or hearing thresholds. Taken together, the results support the view that older adults employ different strategies during auditory sentence processing dependent on their hearing and cognitive abilities and that there is no single ability that uniformly predicts sentence processing outcomes.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513/fullnormal agingsentence processingcognitionhearing lossevent-related potential
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ira Kurthen
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
Matthias Schlesewsky
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
spellingShingle Ira Kurthen
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
Matthias Schlesewsky
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
Frontiers in Neuroscience
normal aging
sentence processing
cognition
hearing loss
event-related potential
author_facet Ira Kurthen
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer
Matthias Schlesewsky
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
author_sort Ira Kurthen
title Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_short Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_full Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_fullStr Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_full_unstemmed Individual Differences in Peripheral Hearing and Cognition Reveal Sentence Processing Differences in Healthy Older Adults
title_sort individual differences in peripheral hearing and cognition reveal sentence processing differences in healthy older adults
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2020-10-01
description When viewed cross-sectionally, aging seems to negatively affect speech comprehension. However, aging is a heterogeneous process, and variability among older adults is typically large. In this study, we investigated language comprehension as a function of individual differences in older adults. Specifically, we tested whether hearing thresholds, working memory, inhibition, and individual alpha frequency would predict event-related potential amplitudes in response to classic psycholinguistic manipulations at the sentence level. Twenty-nine healthy older adults (age range 61–76 years) listened to English sentences containing reduced relative clauses and object-relative clauses while their electroencephalogram was recorded. We found that hearing thresholds and working memory predicted P600 amplitudes early during reduced relative clause processing, while individual alpha frequency predicted P600 amplitudes at a later point in time. The results suggest that participants with better hearing and larger working memory capacity simultaneously activated both the preferred and the dispreferred interpretation of reduced relative clauses, while participants with worse hearing and smaller working memory capacity only activated the preferred interpretation. They also suggest that participants with a higher individual alpha frequency had a higher likelihood of successfully reanalysing the sentence toward the reduced relative clause reading than participants with a lower individual alpha frequency. By contrast, we found no relationship between object-relative clause processing and working memory or hearing thresholds. Taken together, the results support the view that older adults employ different strategies during auditory sentence processing dependent on their hearing and cognitive abilities and that there is no single ability that uniformly predicts sentence processing outcomes.
topic normal aging
sentence processing
cognition
hearing loss
event-related potential
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2020.573513/full
work_keys_str_mv AT irakurthen individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults
AT martinmeyer individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults
AT martinmeyer individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults
AT matthiasschlesewsky individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults
AT inabornkesselschlesewsky individualdifferencesinperipheralhearingandcognitionrevealsentenceprocessingdifferencesinhealthyolderadults
_version_ 1724989263568699392