Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs

Recent advancement in enhanced oil recovery techniques has given petroleum industries the chance to find optimum solutions to recover remained oil from hydrocarbon reservoirs. This paper aims to experimentally investigate the profound impact of reservoir characteristics such as permeability and pres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang Jing, Afshin Davarpanah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Cogent Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2021.1920564
id doaj-36b495ee0b6645c4b27190b778f87f8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36b495ee0b6645c4b27190b778f87f8e2021-05-13T09:30:32ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Engineering2331-19162021-01-018110.1080/23311916.2021.19205641920564Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirsHuang Jing0Afshin Davarpanah1Hunan City UniversityAberystwyth UniversityRecent advancement in enhanced oil recovery techniques has given petroleum industries the chance to find optimum solutions to recover remained oil from hydrocarbon reservoirs. This paper aims to experimentally investigate the profound impact of reservoir characteristics such as permeability and pressure drop and foams properties such as foam quality and foams resistance factor in enhanced oil recovery processes. Therefore, a hybrid recovery technique containing a thermal recovery method (carbon dioxide) and a chemical method (foam injection) with different brine concentrations was performed to enhance the oil recovery factor. Consequently, after brine injectivity, foam injection has provided the highest recovery factor among other scenarios in shale reservoirs. Permeability increase has caused to increase in the resistance factor as the fluid mobilization is increased in the porous media. Therefore, for 80% of foam quality, the resistance factor is about 7.5, while for 40%, foam quality is about 5 at the permeability of 10mD.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2021.1920564shale reservoirsfoam injectioncarbon dioxideresistance factoroil recovery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Huang Jing
Afshin Davarpanah
spellingShingle Huang Jing
Afshin Davarpanah
Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs
Cogent Engineering
shale reservoirs
foam injection
carbon dioxide
resistance factor
oil recovery
author_facet Huang Jing
Afshin Davarpanah
author_sort Huang Jing
title Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs
title_short Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs
title_full Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs
title_fullStr Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Chemical-Thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs
title_sort implications of chemical-thermal enhanced oil recovery methods in shale reservoirs
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Engineering
issn 2331-1916
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Recent advancement in enhanced oil recovery techniques has given petroleum industries the chance to find optimum solutions to recover remained oil from hydrocarbon reservoirs. This paper aims to experimentally investigate the profound impact of reservoir characteristics such as permeability and pressure drop and foams properties such as foam quality and foams resistance factor in enhanced oil recovery processes. Therefore, a hybrid recovery technique containing a thermal recovery method (carbon dioxide) and a chemical method (foam injection) with different brine concentrations was performed to enhance the oil recovery factor. Consequently, after brine injectivity, foam injection has provided the highest recovery factor among other scenarios in shale reservoirs. Permeability increase has caused to increase in the resistance factor as the fluid mobilization is increased in the porous media. Therefore, for 80% of foam quality, the resistance factor is about 7.5, while for 40%, foam quality is about 5 at the permeability of 10mD.
topic shale reservoirs
foam injection
carbon dioxide
resistance factor
oil recovery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2021.1920564
work_keys_str_mv AT huangjing implicationsofchemicalthermalenhancedoilrecoverymethodsinshalereservoirs
AT afshindavarpanah implicationsofchemicalthermalenhancedoilrecoverymethodsinshalereservoirs
_version_ 1721442193124622336