Comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methane

<p>The measurement of low methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) concentrations is a key objective for safety of industrial and public infrastructures and in environmental research. Laser spectroscopy is best suited for this purpose becau...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Strahl, J. Herbst, E. Maier, S. Rademacher, C. Weber, H.-F. Pernau, A. Lambrecht, J. Wöllenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems
Online Access:https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/25/2021/jsss-10-25-2021.pdf
id doaj-36b835a64d9c4143ba3218da2409da8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36b835a64d9c4143ba3218da2409da8b2021-02-22T05:13:38ZengCopernicus PublicationsJournal of Sensors and Sensor Systems2194-87712194-878X2021-02-0110253510.5194/jsss-10-25-2021Comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methaneT. Strahl0T. Strahl1J. Herbst2E. Maier3S. Rademacher4C. Weber5C. Weber6H.-F. Pernau7A. Lambrecht8J. Wöllenstein9J. Wöllenstein10Department Gas and Process Technology, Fraunhofer IPM, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyIMTEK, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyDepartment Gas and Process Technology, Fraunhofer IPM, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyDepartment Gas and Process Technology, Fraunhofer IPM, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyDepartment Gas and Process Technology, Fraunhofer IPM, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyDepartment Gas and Process Technology, Fraunhofer IPM, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyIMTEK, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyDepartment Gas and Process Technology, Fraunhofer IPM, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyDepartment Gas and Process Technology, Fraunhofer IPM, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyDepartment Gas and Process Technology, Fraunhofer IPM, Freiburg, 79110, GermanyIMTEK, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79110, Germany<p>The measurement of low methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) concentrations is a key objective for safety of industrial and public infrastructures and in environmental research. Laser spectroscopy is best suited for this purpose because it offers high sensitivity, selectivity, dynamic range, and a fast measurement rate. The physical basis of this technique is infrared absorption of molecular gases. Two detection schemes – direct absorption spectroscopy (DAS) and photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) – are compared at three wavelength regions in the near-infrared (NIR), mid-wavelength (MWIR), and long-wavelength (LWIR) infrared ranges. For each spectral range a suitable semiconductor laser is selected and used for both detection techniques: a diode laser (DL), an interband cascade laser (ICL), and a quantum cascade laser (QCL) for NIR, MWIR and LWIR, respectively. For DAS short absorption path lengths comparable to the cell dimensions of the photoacoustic cell for PAS are employed. We show that for DAS the lowest detection limit can be achieved in the MWIR range with noise-equivalent concentrations (NECs) below 10 ppb. Using PAS, lower detection limits and higher system stabilities can be reached compared to DAS, especially for long integration times. The lowest detection limit for PAS is obtained in the LWIR with a NEC of 7 ppb. The different DAS and PAS configurations are discussed with respect to potential applications.</p>https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/25/2021/jsss-10-25-2021.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. Strahl
T. Strahl
J. Herbst
E. Maier
S. Rademacher
C. Weber
C. Weber
H.-F. Pernau
A. Lambrecht
J. Wöllenstein
J. Wöllenstein
spellingShingle T. Strahl
T. Strahl
J. Herbst
E. Maier
S. Rademacher
C. Weber
C. Weber
H.-F. Pernau
A. Lambrecht
J. Wöllenstein
J. Wöllenstein
Comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methane
Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems
author_facet T. Strahl
T. Strahl
J. Herbst
E. Maier
S. Rademacher
C. Weber
C. Weber
H.-F. Pernau
A. Lambrecht
J. Wöllenstein
J. Wöllenstein
author_sort T. Strahl
title Comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methane
title_short Comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methane
title_full Comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methane
title_fullStr Comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methane
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methane
title_sort comparison of laser-based photoacoustic and optical detection of methane
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems
issn 2194-8771
2194-878X
publishDate 2021-02-01
description <p>The measurement of low methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) concentrations is a key objective for safety of industrial and public infrastructures and in environmental research. Laser spectroscopy is best suited for this purpose because it offers high sensitivity, selectivity, dynamic range, and a fast measurement rate. The physical basis of this technique is infrared absorption of molecular gases. Two detection schemes – direct absorption spectroscopy (DAS) and photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) – are compared at three wavelength regions in the near-infrared (NIR), mid-wavelength (MWIR), and long-wavelength (LWIR) infrared ranges. For each spectral range a suitable semiconductor laser is selected and used for both detection techniques: a diode laser (DL), an interband cascade laser (ICL), and a quantum cascade laser (QCL) for NIR, MWIR and LWIR, respectively. For DAS short absorption path lengths comparable to the cell dimensions of the photoacoustic cell for PAS are employed. We show that for DAS the lowest detection limit can be achieved in the MWIR range with noise-equivalent concentrations (NECs) below 10 ppb. Using PAS, lower detection limits and higher system stabilities can be reached compared to DAS, especially for long integration times. The lowest detection limit for PAS is obtained in the LWIR with a NEC of 7 ppb. The different DAS and PAS configurations are discussed with respect to potential applications.</p>
url https://jsss.copernicus.org/articles/10/25/2021/jsss-10-25-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tstrahl comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT tstrahl comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT jherbst comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT emaier comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT srademacher comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT cweber comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT cweber comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT hfpernau comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT alambrecht comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT jwollenstein comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
AT jwollenstein comparisonoflaserbasedphotoacousticandopticaldetectionofmethane
_version_ 1724256989085696000