Evaluating User Response to In-Car Haptic Feedback Touchscreens Using the Lane Change Test

Touchscreen interfaces are widely used in modern technology, from mobile devices to in-car infotainment systems. However, touchscreens impose significant visual workload demands on the user which have safety implications for use in cars. Previous studies indicate that the application of haptic feedb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew J. Pitts, Lee Skrypchuk, Tom Wellings, Alex Attridge, Mark A. Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/598739
id doaj-36c8f576b12042a99a18b60bf73d5fc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-36c8f576b12042a99a18b60bf73d5fc32020-11-25T01:03:23ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction1687-58931687-59072012-01-01201210.1155/2012/598739598739Evaluating User Response to In-Car Haptic Feedback Touchscreens Using the Lane Change TestMatthew J. Pitts0Lee Skrypchuk1Tom Wellings2Alex Attridge3Mark A. Williams4WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UKJaguar & Land Rover Research, Jaguar Land Rover, Coventry CV3 4LF, UKWMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UKWMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UKWMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UKTouchscreen interfaces are widely used in modern technology, from mobile devices to in-car infotainment systems. However, touchscreens impose significant visual workload demands on the user which have safety implications for use in cars. Previous studies indicate that the application of haptic feedback can improve both performance of and affective response to user interfaces. This paper reports on and extends the findings of a 2009 study conducted to evaluate the effects of different combinations of touchscreen visual, audible, and haptic feedback on driving and task performance, affective response, and subjective workload; the initial findings of which were originally published in (M. J. Pitts et al., 2009). A total of 48 non-expert users completed the study. A dual-task approach was applied, using the Lane Change Test as the driving task and realistic automotive use case touchscreen tasks. Results indicated that, while feedback type had no effect on driving or task performance, preference was expressed for multimodal feedback over visual alone. Issues relating to workload and cross-modal interaction were also identified.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/598739
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew J. Pitts
Lee Skrypchuk
Tom Wellings
Alex Attridge
Mark A. Williams
spellingShingle Matthew J. Pitts
Lee Skrypchuk
Tom Wellings
Alex Attridge
Mark A. Williams
Evaluating User Response to In-Car Haptic Feedback Touchscreens Using the Lane Change Test
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
author_facet Matthew J. Pitts
Lee Skrypchuk
Tom Wellings
Alex Attridge
Mark A. Williams
author_sort Matthew J. Pitts
title Evaluating User Response to In-Car Haptic Feedback Touchscreens Using the Lane Change Test
title_short Evaluating User Response to In-Car Haptic Feedback Touchscreens Using the Lane Change Test
title_full Evaluating User Response to In-Car Haptic Feedback Touchscreens Using the Lane Change Test
title_fullStr Evaluating User Response to In-Car Haptic Feedback Touchscreens Using the Lane Change Test
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating User Response to In-Car Haptic Feedback Touchscreens Using the Lane Change Test
title_sort evaluating user response to in-car haptic feedback touchscreens using the lane change test
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
issn 1687-5893
1687-5907
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Touchscreen interfaces are widely used in modern technology, from mobile devices to in-car infotainment systems. However, touchscreens impose significant visual workload demands on the user which have safety implications for use in cars. Previous studies indicate that the application of haptic feedback can improve both performance of and affective response to user interfaces. This paper reports on and extends the findings of a 2009 study conducted to evaluate the effects of different combinations of touchscreen visual, audible, and haptic feedback on driving and task performance, affective response, and subjective workload; the initial findings of which were originally published in (M. J. Pitts et al., 2009). A total of 48 non-expert users completed the study. A dual-task approach was applied, using the Lane Change Test as the driving task and realistic automotive use case touchscreen tasks. Results indicated that, while feedback type had no effect on driving or task performance, preference was expressed for multimodal feedback over visual alone. Issues relating to workload and cross-modal interaction were also identified.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/598739
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewjpitts evaluatinguserresponsetoincarhapticfeedbacktouchscreensusingthelanechangetest
AT leeskrypchuk evaluatinguserresponsetoincarhapticfeedbacktouchscreensusingthelanechangetest
AT tomwellings evaluatinguserresponsetoincarhapticfeedbacktouchscreensusingthelanechangetest
AT alexattridge evaluatinguserresponsetoincarhapticfeedbacktouchscreensusingthelanechangetest
AT markawilliams evaluatinguserresponsetoincarhapticfeedbacktouchscreensusingthelanechangetest
_version_ 1725201499330445312