Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review

Introduction: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. Metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anum Irfan Khan, Erin Arthurs, Sharon Gradin, Marnie MacKinnon, Jonathan Sussman, Vishal Kukreti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2017-11-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijic.org/articles/2543
id doaj-37306ff9ac274b8988a7e76015dcd836
record_format Article
spelling doaj-37306ff9ac274b8988a7e76015dcd8362020-11-24T23:24:14ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562017-11-0117610.5334/ijic.25433443Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping ReviewAnum Irfan Khan0Erin Arthurs1Sharon Gradin2Marnie MacKinnon3Jonathan Sussman4Vishal Kukreti5Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ONCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ONCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ONCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ONDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ONCancer Care Ontario; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ONIntroduction: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. Methods: Given limited consensus around what constitutes an integrated care plan for cancer patients, a scoping review was conducted to explore the components of integrated care plans and contextual factors that influence design and uptake. Results: Five types of integrated care plans based on the stage of cancer care: surgical, systemic, survivorship, palliative and comprehensive (involving a transition between stages) are described in current literature. Breast, esophageal and colorectal cancers were common disease sites. Multi-disciplinary teams, patient needs assessment and transitional planning emerged as key features. Provider buy-in and training alongside informational technology support served as important facilitators for plan uptake. Provider-level measurement was considerably less robust compared to patient and system-level indicators. Conclusions: Similarities in design features, components and facilitators across the various types of integrated care plans indicates opportunities to leverage shared features and enable a management lens that spans the trajectory of a patient’s journey rather than a phase-specific silo approach to care.https://www.ijic.org/articles/2543integrated carecancercare planning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anum Irfan Khan
Erin Arthurs
Sharon Gradin
Marnie MacKinnon
Jonathan Sussman
Vishal Kukreti
spellingShingle Anum Irfan Khan
Erin Arthurs
Sharon Gradin
Marnie MacKinnon
Jonathan Sussman
Vishal Kukreti
Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
International Journal of Integrated Care
integrated care
cancer
care planning
author_facet Anum Irfan Khan
Erin Arthurs
Sharon Gradin
Marnie MacKinnon
Jonathan Sussman
Vishal Kukreti
author_sort Anum Irfan Khan
title Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_short Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_full Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
title_sort integrated care planning for cancer patients: a scoping review
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Introduction: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. Methods: Given limited consensus around what constitutes an integrated care plan for cancer patients, a scoping review was conducted to explore the components of integrated care plans and contextual factors that influence design and uptake. Results: Five types of integrated care plans based on the stage of cancer care: surgical, systemic, survivorship, palliative and comprehensive (involving a transition between stages) are described in current literature. Breast, esophageal and colorectal cancers were common disease sites. Multi-disciplinary teams, patient needs assessment and transitional planning emerged as key features. Provider buy-in and training alongside informational technology support served as important facilitators for plan uptake. Provider-level measurement was considerably less robust compared to patient and system-level indicators. Conclusions: Similarities in design features, components and facilitators across the various types of integrated care plans indicates opportunities to leverage shared features and enable a management lens that spans the trajectory of a patient’s journey rather than a phase-specific silo approach to care.
topic integrated care
cancer
care planning
url https://www.ijic.org/articles/2543
work_keys_str_mv AT anumirfankhan integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT erinarthurs integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT sharongradin integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT marniemackinnon integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT jonathansussman integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
AT vishalkukreti integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview
_version_ 1725561229054836736