Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
Introduction: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. Metho...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2017-11-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Integrated Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ijic.org/articles/2543 |
id |
doaj-37306ff9ac274b8988a7e76015dcd836 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-37306ff9ac274b8988a7e76015dcd8362020-11-24T23:24:14ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562017-11-0117610.5334/ijic.25433443Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping ReviewAnum Irfan Khan0Erin Arthurs1Sharon Gradin2Marnie MacKinnon3Jonathan Sussman4Vishal Kukreti5Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ONCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ONCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ONCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ONDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ONCancer Care Ontario; and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ONIntroduction: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. Methods: Given limited consensus around what constitutes an integrated care plan for cancer patients, a scoping review was conducted to explore the components of integrated care plans and contextual factors that influence design and uptake. Results: Five types of integrated care plans based on the stage of cancer care: surgical, systemic, survivorship, palliative and comprehensive (involving a transition between stages) are described in current literature. Breast, esophageal and colorectal cancers were common disease sites. Multi-disciplinary teams, patient needs assessment and transitional planning emerged as key features. Provider buy-in and training alongside informational technology support served as important facilitators for plan uptake. Provider-level measurement was considerably less robust compared to patient and system-level indicators. Conclusions: Similarities in design features, components and facilitators across the various types of integrated care plans indicates opportunities to leverage shared features and enable a management lens that spans the trajectory of a patient’s journey rather than a phase-specific silo approach to care.https://www.ijic.org/articles/2543integrated carecancercare planning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anum Irfan Khan Erin Arthurs Sharon Gradin Marnie MacKinnon Jonathan Sussman Vishal Kukreti |
spellingShingle |
Anum Irfan Khan Erin Arthurs Sharon Gradin Marnie MacKinnon Jonathan Sussman Vishal Kukreti Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review International Journal of Integrated Care integrated care cancer care planning |
author_facet |
Anum Irfan Khan Erin Arthurs Sharon Gradin Marnie MacKinnon Jonathan Sussman Vishal Kukreti |
author_sort |
Anum Irfan Khan |
title |
Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review |
title_short |
Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review |
title_full |
Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr |
Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review |
title_sort |
integrated care planning for cancer patients: a scoping review |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
International Journal of Integrated Care |
issn |
1568-4156 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
Introduction: There has been a growing emphasis on the use of integrated care plans to deliver cancer care. However little is known about how integrated care plans for cancer patients are developed including featured core activities, facilitators for uptake and indicators for assessing impact. Methods: Given limited consensus around what constitutes an integrated care plan for cancer patients, a scoping review was conducted to explore the components of integrated care plans and contextual factors that influence design and uptake. Results: Five types of integrated care plans based on the stage of cancer care: surgical, systemic, survivorship, palliative and comprehensive (involving a transition between stages) are described in current literature. Breast, esophageal and colorectal cancers were common disease sites. Multi-disciplinary teams, patient needs assessment and transitional planning emerged as key features. Provider buy-in and training alongside informational technology support served as important facilitators for plan uptake. Provider-level measurement was considerably less robust compared to patient and system-level indicators. Conclusions: Similarities in design features, components and facilitators across the various types of integrated care plans indicates opportunities to leverage shared features and enable a management lens that spans the trajectory of a patient’s journey rather than a phase-specific silo approach to care. |
topic |
integrated care cancer care planning |
url |
https://www.ijic.org/articles/2543 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anumirfankhan integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview AT erinarthurs integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview AT sharongradin integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview AT marniemackinnon integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview AT jonathansussman integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview AT vishalkukreti integratedcareplanningforcancerpatientsascopingreview |
_version_ |
1725561229054836736 |