Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?

This article examines nonstandard employment and precariousness in four Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway). Drawing on data from the Labour Force Survey from 1995 to 2015, the article investigates and compares recent developments of nonstandard employment in the countries and an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stine Rasmussen, Jouko Nätti, Trine Pernille Larsen, Anna Ilsøe, Anne Helene Garde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University 2019-06-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/njwls/article/view/114689
id doaj-3764e577fa364ed8ad39b29d3856f5c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3764e577fa364ed8ad39b29d3856f5c22020-11-25T02:28:28ZengAalborg UniversityNordic Journal of Working Life Studies2245-01572019-06-019S610.18291/njwls.v9iS6.114689Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?Stine Rasmussen0Jouko Nätti1Trine Pernille Larsen2Anna Ilsøe3Anne Helene Garde4Aalborg UniversityUniversity of TampereUniversity of CopenhagenUniversity of CopenhagenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment This article examines nonstandard employment and precariousness in four Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway). Drawing on data from the Labour Force Survey from 1995 to 2015, the article investigates and compares recent developments of nonstandard employment in the countries and analyzes whether fixed-term contracts, temporary agency work, marginal part-time work and solo self-employment have precarious elements (measured as income or job insecurity). We conclude that nonstandard employment has remained rather stable in all four countries over time. However, although nonstandard employment seems to be largely integrated in the Nordic labor markets, it still entails precarious elements in certain countries in particular. Norway and Denmark stand out as having less insecure labor markets, while Finland and Sweden have more precariousness associated with nonstandard employment. We argue that these differences are explained by differences in the institutional contexts in the countries. https://tidsskrift.dk/njwls/article/view/114689Employment, Wages, Unemployment & RehabilitationLabor Market Institutions & Social Partners
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stine Rasmussen
Jouko Nätti
Trine Pernille Larsen
Anna Ilsøe
Anne Helene Garde
spellingShingle Stine Rasmussen
Jouko Nätti
Trine Pernille Larsen
Anna Ilsøe
Anne Helene Garde
Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?
Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies
Employment, Wages, Unemployment & Rehabilitation
Labor Market Institutions & Social Partners
author_facet Stine Rasmussen
Jouko Nätti
Trine Pernille Larsen
Anna Ilsøe
Anne Helene Garde
author_sort Stine Rasmussen
title Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?
title_short Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?
title_full Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?
title_fullStr Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?
title_full_unstemmed Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – Toward Precarious Work?
title_sort nonstandard employment in the nordics – toward precarious work?
publisher Aalborg University
series Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies
issn 2245-0157
publishDate 2019-06-01
description This article examines nonstandard employment and precariousness in four Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway). Drawing on data from the Labour Force Survey from 1995 to 2015, the article investigates and compares recent developments of nonstandard employment in the countries and analyzes whether fixed-term contracts, temporary agency work, marginal part-time work and solo self-employment have precarious elements (measured as income or job insecurity). We conclude that nonstandard employment has remained rather stable in all four countries over time. However, although nonstandard employment seems to be largely integrated in the Nordic labor markets, it still entails precarious elements in certain countries in particular. Norway and Denmark stand out as having less insecure labor markets, while Finland and Sweden have more precariousness associated with nonstandard employment. We argue that these differences are explained by differences in the institutional contexts in the countries.
topic Employment, Wages, Unemployment & Rehabilitation
Labor Market Institutions & Social Partners
url https://tidsskrift.dk/njwls/article/view/114689
work_keys_str_mv AT stinerasmussen nonstandardemploymentinthenordicstowardprecariouswork
AT joukonatti nonstandardemploymentinthenordicstowardprecariouswork
AT trinepernillelarsen nonstandardemploymentinthenordicstowardprecariouswork
AT annailsøe nonstandardemploymentinthenordicstowardprecariouswork
AT annehelenegarde nonstandardemploymentinthenordicstowardprecariouswork
_version_ 1724837865321398272