Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy

The reliance on courts for addressing public policy questions and political controversies is a central phenomenon in contemporary democracies. The judicialization of politics is the result of a shift in core issues regarding democratic legitimacy, both in the sphere of institution building as well a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernando Filgueiras
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brazilian Political Science Association 2013-08-01
Series:Brazilian Political Science Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/pdf/bpsr/v7n2/03.pdf
id doaj-378320dac4904f26bdf3e74038fd26fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-378320dac4904f26bdf3e74038fd26fe2020-11-25T00:27:19ZengBrazilian Political Science AssociationBrazilian Political Science Review1981-38211981-38212013-08-01726287Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracyFernando Filgueiras0Department of Political Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), BrazilThe reliance on courts for addressing public policy questions and political controversies is a central phenomenon in contemporary democracies. The judicialization of politics is the result of a shift in core issues regarding democratic legitimacy, both in the sphere of institution building as well as political culture. Social justice arose as a central variable in the legitimacy of democracies, becoming vital in establishing support towards democratic political systems. This article explores the relation between perceptions on justice, judicialization of politics and how the agency of judicial institutions impacts dissatisfaction with democracy. Based on a survey carried out in the metropolitan regions of Belo Horizonte, Goiânia, Porto Alegre and Recife, it is argued that the discontent towards political institutions in Brazil does not justify the ongoing judicialization process since the perceptions on inequalities place the Judiciary within the citizens' critical stance towards institutions. Just like other representative institutions, the Judiciary has not been able to mitigate the perceptions on inequalities and the ineffectiveness of the empire of law, being therefore unable to provide a satisfactory performance in regards to the normative ends of contemporary notions of democratic legitimacy and citizenship.http://www.scielo.br/pdf/bpsr/v7n2/03.pdfPerception of justicedistrustjudicializationdemocracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernando Filgueiras
spellingShingle Fernando Filgueiras
Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy
Brazilian Political Science Review
Perception of justice
distrust
judicialization
democracy
author_facet Fernando Filgueiras
author_sort Fernando Filgueiras
title Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy
title_short Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy
title_full Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy
title_fullStr Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy
title_sort perceptions on justice, the judiciary and democracy
publisher Brazilian Political Science Association
series Brazilian Political Science Review
issn 1981-3821
1981-3821
publishDate 2013-08-01
description The reliance on courts for addressing public policy questions and political controversies is a central phenomenon in contemporary democracies. The judicialization of politics is the result of a shift in core issues regarding democratic legitimacy, both in the sphere of institution building as well as political culture. Social justice arose as a central variable in the legitimacy of democracies, becoming vital in establishing support towards democratic political systems. This article explores the relation between perceptions on justice, judicialization of politics and how the agency of judicial institutions impacts dissatisfaction with democracy. Based on a survey carried out in the metropolitan regions of Belo Horizonte, Goiânia, Porto Alegre and Recife, it is argued that the discontent towards political institutions in Brazil does not justify the ongoing judicialization process since the perceptions on inequalities place the Judiciary within the citizens' critical stance towards institutions. Just like other representative institutions, the Judiciary has not been able to mitigate the perceptions on inequalities and the ineffectiveness of the empire of law, being therefore unable to provide a satisfactory performance in regards to the normative ends of contemporary notions of democratic legitimacy and citizenship.
topic Perception of justice
distrust
judicialization
democracy
url http://www.scielo.br/pdf/bpsr/v7n2/03.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandofilgueiras perceptionsonjusticethejudiciaryanddemocracy
_version_ 1725340691380305920