Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer with Pressure-Side Winglet

<p>A numerical study has been conducted to explore the effect of a pressure-side winglet on the flow and heat transfer over a blade tip. Calculations are performed for both a flat tip and a squealer tip. The winglet is in the form of a flat extension, and is shaped in the axial chord direction...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2006-01-01
Series:International Journal of Rotating Machinery
Online Access:http://www.hindawi.com/GetArticle.aspx?doi=10.1155/IJRM/2006/17079
id doaj-3791119204a44f2fa0378f42cb1aeab8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3791119204a44f2fa0378f42cb1aeab82020-11-24T21:36:58ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Rotating Machinery1023-621X2006-01-012006Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer with Pressure-Side Winglet<p>A numerical study has been conducted to explore the effect of a pressure-side winglet on the flow and heat transfer over a blade tip. Calculations are performed for both a flat tip and a squealer tip. The winglet is in the form of a flat extension, and is shaped in the axial chord direction to have the maximum thickness at the chord location, where the pressure difference is the largest between the pressure and suction sides. For the flat tip, the pressure-side winglet exhibits a significant reduction in the leakage flow strength. The low heat transfer coefficient &#8220;sweet-spot&#8221; region is larger with the pressure-side winglet, and lower heat transfer coefficients are also observed along the pressure side of the blade. For the flat tip, the winglet reduces the heat transfer coefficient locally by as much as 30%, while the average heat transfer coefficient is reduced by about 7%. In the presence of a squealer, the role of the winglet decreases significantly, and a 5% reduction in the pressure loss coefficient is achieved with the winglet with virtually no reduction in the average heat transfer coefficient. On the other hand, the suction-side squealer with constant width winglet shows lower heat transfer (reduction of 5.5%) and pressure loss coefficient (reduction of 26%) than its baseline counterpart.</p>http://www.hindawi.com/GetArticle.aspx?doi=10.1155/IJRM/2006/17079
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
title Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer with Pressure-Side Winglet
spellingShingle Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer with Pressure-Side Winglet
International Journal of Rotating Machinery
title_short Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer with Pressure-Side Winglet
title_full Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer with Pressure-Side Winglet
title_fullStr Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer with Pressure-Side Winglet
title_full_unstemmed Blade Tip Leakage Flow and Heat Transfer with Pressure-Side Winglet
title_sort blade tip leakage flow and heat transfer with pressure-side winglet
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Rotating Machinery
issn 1023-621X
publishDate 2006-01-01
description <p>A numerical study has been conducted to explore the effect of a pressure-side winglet on the flow and heat transfer over a blade tip. Calculations are performed for both a flat tip and a squealer tip. The winglet is in the form of a flat extension, and is shaped in the axial chord direction to have the maximum thickness at the chord location, where the pressure difference is the largest between the pressure and suction sides. For the flat tip, the pressure-side winglet exhibits a significant reduction in the leakage flow strength. The low heat transfer coefficient &#8220;sweet-spot&#8221; region is larger with the pressure-side winglet, and lower heat transfer coefficients are also observed along the pressure side of the blade. For the flat tip, the winglet reduces the heat transfer coefficient locally by as much as 30%, while the average heat transfer coefficient is reduced by about 7%. In the presence of a squealer, the role of the winglet decreases significantly, and a 5% reduction in the pressure loss coefficient is achieved with the winglet with virtually no reduction in the average heat transfer coefficient. On the other hand, the suction-side squealer with constant width winglet shows lower heat transfer (reduction of 5.5%) and pressure loss coefficient (reduction of 26%) than its baseline counterpart.</p>
url http://www.hindawi.com/GetArticle.aspx?doi=10.1155/IJRM/2006/17079
_version_ 1725938906332921856