Stakeholders’ Perspectives to Support the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Spatial Planning in Switzerland

Integrating the concept of ecosystem services (ES) into spatial planning is an opportunity to make land use and management choices that maximize the delivery of multiple ES. The assessment of social demand can be useful for the identification of priority areas or potential conflicts among stakeholde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rémi Jaligot, Jérôme Chenal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Environments
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/6/8/88
id doaj-3795d5c0dfce4c0984089f8d193abdc2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3795d5c0dfce4c0984089f8d193abdc22020-11-24T21:51:18ZengMDPI AGEnvironments2076-32982019-07-01688810.3390/environments6080088environments6080088Stakeholders’ Perspectives to Support the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Spatial Planning in SwitzerlandRémi Jaligot0Jérôme Chenal1Urban and Regional Planning Community, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, ENAC-IA-CEAT, Bâtiment BP, Station 16, 1015 Lausanne, SwitzerlandUrban and Regional Planning Community, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, ENAC-IA-CEAT, Bâtiment BP, Station 16, 1015 Lausanne, SwitzerlandIntegrating the concept of ecosystem services (ES) into spatial planning is an opportunity to make land use and management choices that maximize the delivery of multiple ES. The assessment of social demand can be useful for the identification of priority areas or potential conflicts among stakeholders. We used Q-methodology to understand stakeholder perspectives on ES to facilitate their integration into spatial planning in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland. Three perspectives, utilitarian, cultural and protective, were analyzed and used to discuss potential implications for spatial planning. First, ecosystem multifunctionality and synergies among ES should be emphasized. Second, the food production system should move away from a productive-only approach, to a system that protects soils and their functions. Providing a paradigm change, arable land could be protected to the same level as forests and farmers could be incentivized further to change their practices. Finally, our findings show a potential over-interpretation of the importance of cultural ES in current planning policies, as most participants would be ready to change their behaviors to preserve biological functions. It would be useful to conduct a similar study in other cantons to ensure that the results are fully representative of the current situation in Switzerland.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/6/8/88ecosystem servicessocial demandspatial planningSwitzerlandQ-methodology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rémi Jaligot
Jérôme Chenal
spellingShingle Rémi Jaligot
Jérôme Chenal
Stakeholders’ Perspectives to Support the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Spatial Planning in Switzerland
Environments
ecosystem services
social demand
spatial planning
Switzerland
Q-methodology
author_facet Rémi Jaligot
Jérôme Chenal
author_sort Rémi Jaligot
title Stakeholders’ Perspectives to Support the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Spatial Planning in Switzerland
title_short Stakeholders’ Perspectives to Support the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Spatial Planning in Switzerland
title_full Stakeholders’ Perspectives to Support the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Spatial Planning in Switzerland
title_fullStr Stakeholders’ Perspectives to Support the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Spatial Planning in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders’ Perspectives to Support the Integration of Ecosystem Services in Spatial Planning in Switzerland
title_sort stakeholders’ perspectives to support the integration of ecosystem services in spatial planning in switzerland
publisher MDPI AG
series Environments
issn 2076-3298
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Integrating the concept of ecosystem services (ES) into spatial planning is an opportunity to make land use and management choices that maximize the delivery of multiple ES. The assessment of social demand can be useful for the identification of priority areas or potential conflicts among stakeholders. We used Q-methodology to understand stakeholder perspectives on ES to facilitate their integration into spatial planning in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland. Three perspectives, utilitarian, cultural and protective, were analyzed and used to discuss potential implications for spatial planning. First, ecosystem multifunctionality and synergies among ES should be emphasized. Second, the food production system should move away from a productive-only approach, to a system that protects soils and their functions. Providing a paradigm change, arable land could be protected to the same level as forests and farmers could be incentivized further to change their practices. Finally, our findings show a potential over-interpretation of the importance of cultural ES in current planning policies, as most participants would be ready to change their behaviors to preserve biological functions. It would be useful to conduct a similar study in other cantons to ensure that the results are fully representative of the current situation in Switzerland.
topic ecosystem services
social demand
spatial planning
Switzerland
Q-methodology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/6/8/88
work_keys_str_mv AT remijaligot stakeholdersperspectivestosupporttheintegrationofecosystemservicesinspatialplanninginswitzerland
AT jeromechenal stakeholdersperspectivestosupporttheintegrationofecosystemservicesinspatialplanninginswitzerland
_version_ 1725879262308728832