“Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity

In the neuropsychological literature, there is a debate concerning whether neuropsychological tests necessarily are better means for assessing impulsivity than are trait measures. Yet, there is an inherent problem in looking at these test results: Cognitive impulsivity (i.e. impulsive performance on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph Glicksohn, Yamit Hadad, Tal Ben-Yaacov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1242682
id doaj-37da0be8d67c485eaea84031ad910fdb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-37da0be8d67c485eaea84031ad910fdb2021-03-18T16:21:44ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Psychology2331-19082016-12-013110.1080/23311908.2016.12426821242682“Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivityJoseph Glicksohn0Yamit Hadad1Tal Ben-Yaacov2Bar-Ilan UniversityBar-Ilan UniversityBar-Ilan UniversityIn the neuropsychological literature, there is a debate concerning whether neuropsychological tests necessarily are better means for assessing impulsivity than are trait measures. Yet, there is an inherent problem in looking at these test results: Cognitive impulsivity (i.e. impulsive performance on a standard task, assessed looking at the speed-accuracy trade-off in the data) might only sometimes be indicative of trait impulsivity, and trait impulsivity might also only sometimes be indicative of cognitive impulsivity. There is, however, no complete overlap. This is the conclusion drawn from two studies reported in this paper. One option is to first look at those participants scoring high on trait impulsivity, and then to interpret their performance on neuropsychological tests in terms of this. Poor performance for them is most likely indicative of impulsive performance. There is, however, another option: That individuals scoring high on trait impulsivity implement this impulsivity in their performance, sometimes performing impulsively, and sometimes not. A plausible solution is to incorporate both self-report and analysis of performance in both neuropsychological assessment and personality research.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1242682trait impulsivitycognitive impulsivityassessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joseph Glicksohn
Yamit Hadad
Tal Ben-Yaacov
spellingShingle Joseph Glicksohn
Yamit Hadad
Tal Ben-Yaacov
“Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity
Cogent Psychology
trait impulsivity
cognitive impulsivity
assessment
author_facet Joseph Glicksohn
Yamit Hadad
Tal Ben-Yaacov
author_sort Joseph Glicksohn
title “Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity
title_short “Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity
title_full “Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity
title_fullStr “Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity
title_full_unstemmed “Now you see me, now you don’t”: The assessment of impulsivity
title_sort “now you see me, now you don’t”: the assessment of impulsivity
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Psychology
issn 2331-1908
publishDate 2016-12-01
description In the neuropsychological literature, there is a debate concerning whether neuropsychological tests necessarily are better means for assessing impulsivity than are trait measures. Yet, there is an inherent problem in looking at these test results: Cognitive impulsivity (i.e. impulsive performance on a standard task, assessed looking at the speed-accuracy trade-off in the data) might only sometimes be indicative of trait impulsivity, and trait impulsivity might also only sometimes be indicative of cognitive impulsivity. There is, however, no complete overlap. This is the conclusion drawn from two studies reported in this paper. One option is to first look at those participants scoring high on trait impulsivity, and then to interpret their performance on neuropsychological tests in terms of this. Poor performance for them is most likely indicative of impulsive performance. There is, however, another option: That individuals scoring high on trait impulsivity implement this impulsivity in their performance, sometimes performing impulsively, and sometimes not. A plausible solution is to incorporate both self-report and analysis of performance in both neuropsychological assessment and personality research.
topic trait impulsivity
cognitive impulsivity
assessment
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1242682
work_keys_str_mv AT josephglicksohn nowyouseemenowyoudonttheassessmentofimpulsivity
AT yamithadad nowyouseemenowyoudonttheassessmentofimpulsivity
AT talbenyaacov nowyouseemenowyoudonttheassessmentofimpulsivity
_version_ 1724215344862593024