Does Surgical Volume Influence the Need for Second Surgery? A Pilot Study

• Main Authors: Paul D. Judge MD, Joseph Menousek, Jordan C. Schramm MD, MS, Robert Cusick MD, William Lydiatt MD, EMBA
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-08-01
• Series: OTO Open
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/2473974X17728257

Objective To examine outcomes of pediatric thyroidectomy in the context of training background, institution, and experience of the surgeon. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting A tertiary academic medical center and a pediatric hospital. Subjects and Methods Eighty-one thyroidectomy patients younger than 18 years. Outcomes were major complications (recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, permanent hypocalcemia, and wound infection), length of stay (LOS), and need for repeat surgery. Results Eighty-one patients, 39 from the University of Nebraska Medical Center and 42 from the Children’s Hospital and Medical Center–Omaha, were identified over a 12-year time period. No difference was found in surgeon training (otolaryngology/head and neck surgery vs general/pediatric surgery) for complications (1 vs 1, odds ratio [OR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.05, 13.1]), LOS >1 day (5 vs 13, OR = 0.39, 95% CI = [0.13, 1.24]), or need for second surgery (4 vs 7, OR = 1.47, 95% CI = [0.39, 5.49]). Higher surgeon volume (≥12 surgeries) was found to be significant for decreased need for second surgery (3 vs 8, OR = 6.67, 95% CI = [1.57, 27.17]). Patients of higher-volume surgeons were 4.2 times more likely to stay in the hospital 1 day or less compared with those patients operated on by surgeons with less experience (7 vs 11, 95% CI = [1.59, 15.0]). Conclusions Need for second surgery in pediatric thyroidectomy may be predicted by surgical volume.