Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy

Abstract Background Clinical practice typically emphasizes active involvement during therapy. However, traditional approaches can offer only general guidance on the form of involvement that would be most helpful to recovery. Beyond assisting movement, robots allow comprehensive methods for measuring...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zachary A. Wright, Yazan A. Majeed, James L. Patton, Felix C. Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00672-8
id doaj-382389eaa9ae4d8d9d478c2e3e997559
record_format Article
spelling doaj-382389eaa9ae4d8d9d478c2e3e9975592020-11-25T02:59:49ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032020-04-0117111210.1186/s12984-020-00672-8Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapyZachary A. Wright0Yazan A. Majeed1James L. Patton2Felix C. Huang3Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at ChicagoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at ChicagoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at ChicagoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts UniversityAbstract Background Clinical practice typically emphasizes active involvement during therapy. However, traditional approaches can offer only general guidance on the form of involvement that would be most helpful to recovery. Beyond assisting movement, robots allow comprehensive methods for measuring practice behaviors, including the energetic input of the learner. Using data from our previous study of robot-assisted therapy, we examined how separate components of mechanical work contribute to predicting training outcomes. Methods Stroke survivors (n = 11) completed six sessions in two-weeks of upper extremity motor exploration (self-directed movement practice) training with customized forces, while a control group (n = 11) trained without assistance. We employed multiple regression analysis to predict patient outcomes with computed mechanical work as independent variables, including separate features for elbow versus shoulder joints, positive (concentric) and negative (eccentric), flexion and extension. Results Our analysis showed that increases in total mechanical work during therapy were positively correlated with our final outcome metric, velocity range. Further analysis revealed that greater amounts of negative work at the shoulder and positive work at the elbow as the most important predictors of recovery (using cross-validated regression, R2 = 52%). However, the work features were likely mutually correlated, suggesting a prediction model that first removed shared variance (using PCA, R2 = 65–85%). Conclusions These results support robotic training for stroke survivors that increases energetic activity in eccentric shoulder and concentric elbow actions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , Identifier: NCT02570256 . Registered 7 October 2015 – Retrospectively registered,http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00672-8StrokeRobotic therapyUpper limbEnergeticsNeurorehabilitationOutcomes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zachary A. Wright
Yazan A. Majeed
James L. Patton
Felix C. Huang
spellingShingle Zachary A. Wright
Yazan A. Majeed
James L. Patton
Felix C. Huang
Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Stroke
Robotic therapy
Upper limb
Energetics
Neurorehabilitation
Outcomes
author_facet Zachary A. Wright
Yazan A. Majeed
James L. Patton
Felix C. Huang
author_sort Zachary A. Wright
title Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_short Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_full Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_fullStr Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_full_unstemmed Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_sort key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
publisher BMC
series Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
issn 1743-0003
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract Background Clinical practice typically emphasizes active involvement during therapy. However, traditional approaches can offer only general guidance on the form of involvement that would be most helpful to recovery. Beyond assisting movement, robots allow comprehensive methods for measuring practice behaviors, including the energetic input of the learner. Using data from our previous study of robot-assisted therapy, we examined how separate components of mechanical work contribute to predicting training outcomes. Methods Stroke survivors (n = 11) completed six sessions in two-weeks of upper extremity motor exploration (self-directed movement practice) training with customized forces, while a control group (n = 11) trained without assistance. We employed multiple regression analysis to predict patient outcomes with computed mechanical work as independent variables, including separate features for elbow versus shoulder joints, positive (concentric) and negative (eccentric), flexion and extension. Results Our analysis showed that increases in total mechanical work during therapy were positively correlated with our final outcome metric, velocity range. Further analysis revealed that greater amounts of negative work at the shoulder and positive work at the elbow as the most important predictors of recovery (using cross-validated regression, R2 = 52%). However, the work features were likely mutually correlated, suggesting a prediction model that first removed shared variance (using PCA, R2 = 65–85%). Conclusions These results support robotic training for stroke survivors that increases energetic activity in eccentric shoulder and concentric elbow actions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov , Identifier: NCT02570256 . Registered 7 October 2015 – Retrospectively registered,
topic Stroke
Robotic therapy
Upper limb
Energetics
Neurorehabilitation
Outcomes
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00672-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharyawright keycomponentsofmechanicalworkpredictoutcomesinroboticstroketherapy
AT yazanamajeed keycomponentsofmechanicalworkpredictoutcomesinroboticstroketherapy
AT jameslpatton keycomponentsofmechanicalworkpredictoutcomesinroboticstroketherapy
AT felixchuang keycomponentsofmechanicalworkpredictoutcomesinroboticstroketherapy
_version_ 1724700917346861056