Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges

In a recent paper (Reid et al.; 2009, NeuroImage) we introduced a method to calculate optimal hierarchies in the visual network that utilizes continuous, rather than discrete, hierarchical levels, and permits a range of acceptable values rather than attempting to fit fixed hierarchical distances. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antje Krumnack, Andrew T Reid, Egon Wanke, Gleb Bezgin, Rolf Kötter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2010-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fninf.2010.00007/full
id doaj-382cfc65230242a098d559d47fbf3459
record_format Article
spelling doaj-382cfc65230242a098d559d47fbf34592020-11-24T22:48:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroinformatics1662-51962010-03-01410.3389/fninf.2010.00007971Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous rangesAntje Krumnack0Andrew T Reid1Andrew T Reid2Egon Wanke3Gleb Bezgin4Gleb Bezgin5Rolf Kötter6University of GiessenHeinrich Heine UniversityRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreHeinrich Heine UniversityHeinrich Heine UniversityRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreIn a recent paper (Reid et al.; 2009, NeuroImage) we introduced a method to calculate optimal hierarchies in the visual network that utilizes continuous, rather than discrete, hierarchical levels, and permits a range of acceptable values rather than attempting to fit fixed hierarchical distances. There, to obtain a hierarchy, the sum of deviations from the constraints that define the hierarchy was minimized using linear optimization. In the short time since publication of that paper we noticed that many colleagues misinterpreted the meaning of the term optimal hierarchy. In particular, a majority of them were under the impression that there was perhaps only one optimal hierarchy, but a substantial difficulty in finding that one. However, there is not only more than one optimal hierarchy but also more than one option for defining optimality. Continuing the line of this work we look at additional options for optimizing the visual hierarchy: minimizing the number of violated constraints and minimizing the maximal size of a constraint violation using linear optimization and mixed integer programming. The implementation of both optimization criteria is explained in detail. In addition, using constraint sets based on the data from Felleman and Van Essen, optimal hierarchies for the visual network are calculated for both optimization methods.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fninf.2010.00007/fullconnectivityhierarchylinear programmingmacaquemixed integer programmingoptimality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antje Krumnack
Andrew T Reid
Andrew T Reid
Egon Wanke
Gleb Bezgin
Gleb Bezgin
Rolf Kötter
spellingShingle Antje Krumnack
Andrew T Reid
Andrew T Reid
Egon Wanke
Gleb Bezgin
Gleb Bezgin
Rolf Kötter
Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
connectivity
hierarchy
linear programming
macaque
mixed integer programming
optimality
author_facet Antje Krumnack
Andrew T Reid
Andrew T Reid
Egon Wanke
Gleb Bezgin
Gleb Bezgin
Rolf Kötter
author_sort Antje Krumnack
title Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges
title_short Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges
title_full Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges
title_fullStr Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges
title_full_unstemmed Criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges
title_sort criteria for optimizing cortical hierarchies with continuous ranges
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
issn 1662-5196
publishDate 2010-03-01
description In a recent paper (Reid et al.; 2009, NeuroImage) we introduced a method to calculate optimal hierarchies in the visual network that utilizes continuous, rather than discrete, hierarchical levels, and permits a range of acceptable values rather than attempting to fit fixed hierarchical distances. There, to obtain a hierarchy, the sum of deviations from the constraints that define the hierarchy was minimized using linear optimization. In the short time since publication of that paper we noticed that many colleagues misinterpreted the meaning of the term optimal hierarchy. In particular, a majority of them were under the impression that there was perhaps only one optimal hierarchy, but a substantial difficulty in finding that one. However, there is not only more than one optimal hierarchy but also more than one option for defining optimality. Continuing the line of this work we look at additional options for optimizing the visual hierarchy: minimizing the number of violated constraints and minimizing the maximal size of a constraint violation using linear optimization and mixed integer programming. The implementation of both optimization criteria is explained in detail. In addition, using constraint sets based on the data from Felleman and Van Essen, optimal hierarchies for the visual network are calculated for both optimization methods.
topic connectivity
hierarchy
linear programming
macaque
mixed integer programming
optimality
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fninf.2010.00007/full
work_keys_str_mv AT antjekrumnack criteriaforoptimizingcorticalhierarchieswithcontinuousranges
AT andrewtreid criteriaforoptimizingcorticalhierarchieswithcontinuousranges
AT andrewtreid criteriaforoptimizingcorticalhierarchieswithcontinuousranges
AT egonwanke criteriaforoptimizingcorticalhierarchieswithcontinuousranges
AT glebbezgin criteriaforoptimizingcorticalhierarchieswithcontinuousranges
AT glebbezgin criteriaforoptimizingcorticalhierarchieswithcontinuousranges
AT rolfkotter criteriaforoptimizingcorticalhierarchieswithcontinuousranges
_version_ 1725677922282373120