Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and Other

Body size misperception is common amongst the general public and is a core component of eating disorders and related conditions. While perennial media exposure to the thin ideal has been blamed for this misperception, relatively little research has examined visual adaptation as a potential mechanism...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin R. Brooks, Jonathan M Mond, Richard J Stevenson, Ian D Stephen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00334/full
id doaj-3852f622c13c46fa9dfdc5b2f83a323a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3852f622c13c46fa9dfdc5b2f83a323a2020-11-24T21:48:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2016-07-011010.3389/fnins.2016.00334204379Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and OtherKevin R. Brooks0Kevin R. Brooks1Jonathan M Mond2Jonathan M Mond3Richard J Stevenson4Richard J Stevenson5Ian D Stephen6Ian D Stephen7Ian D Stephen8Macquarie UniversityMacquarie UniversityMacquarie UniversityMacquarie UniversityMacquarie UniversityMacquarie UniversityMacquarie UniversityMacquarie UniversityMacquarie UniversityBody size misperception is common amongst the general public and is a core component of eating disorders and related conditions. While perennial media exposure to the thin ideal has been blamed for this misperception, relatively little research has examined visual adaptation as a potential mechanism. We examined the extent to which the bodies of self and other are processed by common or separate mechanisms in young women. Using a contingent adaptation paradigm, experiment 1 gave participants prolonged exposure to images both of the self and of another female that had been distorted in opposite directions (e.g. expanded other/contracted self), and assessed the aftereffects using test images both of the self and other. The directions of the resulting perceptual biases were contingent on the test stimulus, establishing at least some separation between the mechanisms encoding these body types. Experiment 2 used a cross adaptation paradigm to further investigate the extent to which these mechanisms are independent. Participants were adapted either to expanded or to contracted images of their own body or that of another female. While adaptation effects were largest when adapting and testing with the same body type, confirming the separation of mechanisms reported in experiment 1, substantial misperceptions were also demonstrated for cross adaptation conditions, demonstrating a degree of overlap in the encoding of self and other. In addition, the evidence of misperception of one’s own body following exposure to thin and to fat others demonstrates the viability of visual adaptation as a model of body image disturbance both for those who underestimate and those who overestimate their own size.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00334/fullEating DisordersPerceptionPsychophysicsadaptationbody imageneural representation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin R. Brooks
Kevin R. Brooks
Jonathan M Mond
Jonathan M Mond
Richard J Stevenson
Richard J Stevenson
Ian D Stephen
Ian D Stephen
Ian D Stephen
spellingShingle Kevin R. Brooks
Kevin R. Brooks
Jonathan M Mond
Jonathan M Mond
Richard J Stevenson
Richard J Stevenson
Ian D Stephen
Ian D Stephen
Ian D Stephen
Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and Other
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Eating Disorders
Perception
Psychophysics
adaptation
body image
neural representation
author_facet Kevin R. Brooks
Kevin R. Brooks
Jonathan M Mond
Jonathan M Mond
Richard J Stevenson
Richard J Stevenson
Ian D Stephen
Ian D Stephen
Ian D Stephen
author_sort Kevin R. Brooks
title Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and Other
title_short Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and Other
title_full Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and Other
title_fullStr Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and Other
title_full_unstemmed Body Image Distortion and Exposure to Extreme Body Types: Contingent Adaptation and Cross Adaptation for Self and Other
title_sort body image distortion and exposure to extreme body types: contingent adaptation and cross adaptation for self and other
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Body size misperception is common amongst the general public and is a core component of eating disorders and related conditions. While perennial media exposure to the thin ideal has been blamed for this misperception, relatively little research has examined visual adaptation as a potential mechanism. We examined the extent to which the bodies of self and other are processed by common or separate mechanisms in young women. Using a contingent adaptation paradigm, experiment 1 gave participants prolonged exposure to images both of the self and of another female that had been distorted in opposite directions (e.g. expanded other/contracted self), and assessed the aftereffects using test images both of the self and other. The directions of the resulting perceptual biases were contingent on the test stimulus, establishing at least some separation between the mechanisms encoding these body types. Experiment 2 used a cross adaptation paradigm to further investigate the extent to which these mechanisms are independent. Participants were adapted either to expanded or to contracted images of their own body or that of another female. While adaptation effects were largest when adapting and testing with the same body type, confirming the separation of mechanisms reported in experiment 1, substantial misperceptions were also demonstrated for cross adaptation conditions, demonstrating a degree of overlap in the encoding of self and other. In addition, the evidence of misperception of one’s own body following exposure to thin and to fat others demonstrates the viability of visual adaptation as a model of body image disturbance both for those who underestimate and those who overestimate their own size.
topic Eating Disorders
Perception
Psychophysics
adaptation
body image
neural representation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00334/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinrbrooks bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
AT kevinrbrooks bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
AT jonathanmmond bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
AT jonathanmmond bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
AT richardjstevenson bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
AT richardjstevenson bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
AT iandstephen bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
AT iandstephen bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
AT iandstephen bodyimagedistortionandexposuretoextremebodytypescontingentadaptationandcrossadaptationforselfandother
_version_ 1725893881324634112