Tax Incentive Policy for Geothermal Development: A Comparative Analysis in ASEAN

This paper examines tax incentive policies in geothermal industries in ASEAN to better understand the development of geothermal industry investment in the ASEAN Member States (AMS) using a qualitative method. The results indicate that tax incentive policies have supported the investment climate and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Zainul Abidin, Haula Rosdiana, Roy Valiant Salomo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Diponegoro University 2020-02-01
Series:International Journal of Renewable Energy Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijred/article/view/23633
id doaj-38bb322df2c443d988d66bab8a2faf5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38bb322df2c443d988d66bab8a2faf5b2021-01-02T15:11:07ZengDiponegoro UniversityInternational Journal of Renewable Energy Development2252-49402252-49402020-02-0191536210.14710/ijred.9.1.53-6216119Tax Incentive Policy for Geothermal Development: A Comparative Analysis in ASEANMohammad Zainul Abidin0Haula Rosdiana1Roy Valiant Salomo2Fiscal Policy Agency, Ministry of FinanceFaculty of Administrative Science, Universitas IndonesiaFaculty of Administrative Science, Universitas IndonesiaThis paper examines tax incentive policies in geothermal industries in ASEAN to better understand the development of geothermal industry investment in the ASEAN Member States (AMS) using a qualitative method. The results indicate that tax incentive policies have supported the investment climate and the development of geothermal industries in the AMS. Geothermal investments and production capacities in AMS have increased significantly. AMS that provide geothermal tax incentives include Indonesia, Lao PDR, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. The performance of geothermal tax incentive policies is reflected in the level of utilization of geothermal potential, which is higher in states that provide greater tax incentives. The results also indicate that geothermal power plants in AMS use dry steam, flash and binary cycle technologies with flash plants being the most common. Results suggest that the future development of geothermal energy in AMS will be related to the tax incentive policy and investment climate in those states. Furthermore, the granting of various types of tax incentives should be focused on the initial investment in geothermal development. ©2020. CBIORE-IJRED. All rights reservedhttps://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijred/article/view/23633policy analysistax incentivegeothermal industryenergy developmentinvestment.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Zainul Abidin
Haula Rosdiana
Roy Valiant Salomo
spellingShingle Mohammad Zainul Abidin
Haula Rosdiana
Roy Valiant Salomo
Tax Incentive Policy for Geothermal Development: A Comparative Analysis in ASEAN
International Journal of Renewable Energy Development
policy analysis
tax incentive
geothermal industry
energy development
investment.
author_facet Mohammad Zainul Abidin
Haula Rosdiana
Roy Valiant Salomo
author_sort Mohammad Zainul Abidin
title Tax Incentive Policy for Geothermal Development: A Comparative Analysis in ASEAN
title_short Tax Incentive Policy for Geothermal Development: A Comparative Analysis in ASEAN
title_full Tax Incentive Policy for Geothermal Development: A Comparative Analysis in ASEAN
title_fullStr Tax Incentive Policy for Geothermal Development: A Comparative Analysis in ASEAN
title_full_unstemmed Tax Incentive Policy for Geothermal Development: A Comparative Analysis in ASEAN
title_sort tax incentive policy for geothermal development: a comparative analysis in asean
publisher Diponegoro University
series International Journal of Renewable Energy Development
issn 2252-4940
2252-4940
publishDate 2020-02-01
description This paper examines tax incentive policies in geothermal industries in ASEAN to better understand the development of geothermal industry investment in the ASEAN Member States (AMS) using a qualitative method. The results indicate that tax incentive policies have supported the investment climate and the development of geothermal industries in the AMS. Geothermal investments and production capacities in AMS have increased significantly. AMS that provide geothermal tax incentives include Indonesia, Lao PDR, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. The performance of geothermal tax incentive policies is reflected in the level of utilization of geothermal potential, which is higher in states that provide greater tax incentives. The results also indicate that geothermal power plants in AMS use dry steam, flash and binary cycle technologies with flash plants being the most common. Results suggest that the future development of geothermal energy in AMS will be related to the tax incentive policy and investment climate in those states. Furthermore, the granting of various types of tax incentives should be focused on the initial investment in geothermal development. ©2020. CBIORE-IJRED. All rights reserved
topic policy analysis
tax incentive
geothermal industry
energy development
investment.
url https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijred/article/view/23633
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadzainulabidin taxincentivepolicyforgeothermaldevelopmentacomparativeanalysisinasean
AT haularosdiana taxincentivepolicyforgeothermaldevelopmentacomparativeanalysisinasean
AT royvaliantsalomo taxincentivepolicyforgeothermaldevelopmentacomparativeanalysisinasean
_version_ 1724353039327821824