Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study

Abstract Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong breast cancer risk factor, however, other mammographic features, such as V, the standard deviation (SD) of pixel intensity, may be associated with risk. We assessed whether PMD, automated PMD (APD), and V, yielded independent associations with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erica T. Warner, Megan S. Rice, Oana A. Zeleznik, Erin E. Fowler, Divya Murthy, Celine M. Vachon, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Bernard A. Rosner, John Heine, Rulla M. Tamimi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-05-01
Series:npj Breast Cancer
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00272-2
id doaj-38e65c2a56f14278945713b23d59b86a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-38e65c2a56f14278945713b23d59b86a2021-06-06T11:04:04ZengNature Publishing Groupnpj Breast Cancer2374-46772021-05-01711810.1038/s41523-021-00272-2Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control studyErica T. Warner0Megan S. Rice1Oana A. Zeleznik2Erin E. Fowler3Divya Murthy4Celine M. Vachon5Kimberly A. Bertrand6Bernard A. Rosner7John Heine8Rulla M. Tamimi9Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolClinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolDivision of Population Sciences, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo ClinicSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston UniversityChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolDivision of Population Sciences, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolAbstract Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong breast cancer risk factor, however, other mammographic features, such as V, the standard deviation (SD) of pixel intensity, may be associated with risk. We assessed whether PMD, automated PMD (APD), and V, yielded independent associations with breast cancer risk. We included 1900 breast cancer cases and 3921 matched controls from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the NHSII. Using digitized film mammograms, we estimated PMD using a computer-assisted thresholding technique. APD and V were determined using an automated computer algorithm. We used logistic regression to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Median time from mammogram to diagnosis was 4.1 years (interquartile range: 1.6–6.8 years). PMD (OR per SD:1.52, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.63), APD (OR per SD:1.32, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.41), and V (OR per SD:1.32, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.40) were positively associated with breast cancer risk. Associations for APD were attenuated but remained statistically significant after mutual adjustment for PMD or V. Women in the highest quartile of both APD and V (OR vs Q1/Q1: 2.49, 95% CI: 2.02, 3.06), or PMD and V (OR vs Q1/Q1: 3.57, 95% CI: 2.79, 4.58) had increased breast cancer risk. An automated method of PMD assessment is feasible and yields similar, but somewhat weaker, estimates to a manual measure. PMD, APD and V are each independently, positively associated with breast cancer risk. Women with dense breasts and greater texture variation are at the highest relative risk of breast cancer.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00272-2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erica T. Warner
Megan S. Rice
Oana A. Zeleznik
Erin E. Fowler
Divya Murthy
Celine M. Vachon
Kimberly A. Bertrand
Bernard A. Rosner
John Heine
Rulla M. Tamimi
spellingShingle Erica T. Warner
Megan S. Rice
Oana A. Zeleznik
Erin E. Fowler
Divya Murthy
Celine M. Vachon
Kimberly A. Bertrand
Bernard A. Rosner
John Heine
Rulla M. Tamimi
Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study
npj Breast Cancer
author_facet Erica T. Warner
Megan S. Rice
Oana A. Zeleznik
Erin E. Fowler
Divya Murthy
Celine M. Vachon
Kimberly A. Bertrand
Bernard A. Rosner
John Heine
Rulla M. Tamimi
author_sort Erica T. Warner
title Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_short Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_full Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_fullStr Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study
title_sort automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series npj Breast Cancer
issn 2374-4677
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong breast cancer risk factor, however, other mammographic features, such as V, the standard deviation (SD) of pixel intensity, may be associated with risk. We assessed whether PMD, automated PMD (APD), and V, yielded independent associations with breast cancer risk. We included 1900 breast cancer cases and 3921 matched controls from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the NHSII. Using digitized film mammograms, we estimated PMD using a computer-assisted thresholding technique. APD and V were determined using an automated computer algorithm. We used logistic regression to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Median time from mammogram to diagnosis was 4.1 years (interquartile range: 1.6–6.8 years). PMD (OR per SD:1.52, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.63), APD (OR per SD:1.32, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.41), and V (OR per SD:1.32, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.40) were positively associated with breast cancer risk. Associations for APD were attenuated but remained statistically significant after mutual adjustment for PMD or V. Women in the highest quartile of both APD and V (OR vs Q1/Q1: 2.49, 95% CI: 2.02, 3.06), or PMD and V (OR vs Q1/Q1: 3.57, 95% CI: 2.79, 4.58) had increased breast cancer risk. An automated method of PMD assessment is feasible and yields similar, but somewhat weaker, estimates to a manual measure. PMD, APD and V are each independently, positively associated with breast cancer risk. Women with dense breasts and greater texture variation are at the highest relative risk of breast cancer.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00272-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ericatwarner automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT megansrice automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT oanaazeleznik automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT erinefowler automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT divyamurthy automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT celinemvachon automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT kimberlyabertrand automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT bernardarosner automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT johnheine automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
AT rullamtamimi automatedpercentmammographicdensitymammographictexturevariationandriskofbreastcanceranestedcasecontrolstudy
_version_ 1721394395461189632