Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques

The light-curing technique is relevant to reduce the degree of polymerization shrinkage, improving clinical and esthetic success of composite resin restorations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vitro the effect of four light-curing techniques on depth of cure of a composite resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ericson Janolio de Camargo, Eduardo Moreschi, Wagner Baseggio, Jaime Aparecido Cury, Renata Corrêa Pascotto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2009-10-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000500018
id doaj-393af016f9a246c7aa22ec416496544d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-393af016f9a246c7aa22ec416496544d2020-11-24T20:44:56ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652009-10-0117544645010.1590/S1678-77572009000500018Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniquesEricson Janolio de CamargoEduardo MoreschiWagner BaseggioJaime Aparecido CuryRenata Corrêa PascottoThe light-curing technique is relevant to reduce the degree of polymerization shrinkage, improving clinical and esthetic success of composite resin restorations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vitro the effect of four light-curing techniques on depth of cure of a composite resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten specimens of a composite resin were made in cylindrical cavities prepared in PVC plates (3.0 X 7.0 mm) for each light-curing technique. Four photoactivation methods were investigated: stepped, ramped, pulse-delay and traditional. Specimens were longitudinally sectioned and polished for microhardness measurements (kg/mm²), which were made at 0.1, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mm from the irradiated surface. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: The effect of factors studied (curing method and distance from the surface) and the interaction of these factors was statistically significant (p<0.05). The traditional method of cure provided higher microhardness values (69.6 ± 2.5) than the stepped (63.5 ± 3.1) and pulsed (63.9 ± 3.2) methods at all depths evaluated, but it did not differ from the ramped method (66.7± 4.4) at 0.1 and 1.0 mm of depth. CONCLUSION: All techniques employed provided satisfactory cure of the composite resin up to the depth of 2.0 mm from the irradiated surface.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000500018Composite resinsCureBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ericson Janolio de Camargo
Eduardo Moreschi
Wagner Baseggio
Jaime Aparecido Cury
Renata Corrêa Pascotto
spellingShingle Ericson Janolio de Camargo
Eduardo Moreschi
Wagner Baseggio
Jaime Aparecido Cury
Renata Corrêa Pascotto
Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Composite resins
Cure
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
author_facet Ericson Janolio de Camargo
Eduardo Moreschi
Wagner Baseggio
Jaime Aparecido Cury
Renata Corrêa Pascotto
author_sort Ericson Janolio de Camargo
title Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques
title_short Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques
title_full Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques
title_fullStr Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques
title_full_unstemmed Composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques
title_sort composite depth of cure using four polymerization techniques
publisher University of São Paulo
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
publishDate 2009-10-01
description The light-curing technique is relevant to reduce the degree of polymerization shrinkage, improving clinical and esthetic success of composite resin restorations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vitro the effect of four light-curing techniques on depth of cure of a composite resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten specimens of a composite resin were made in cylindrical cavities prepared in PVC plates (3.0 X 7.0 mm) for each light-curing technique. Four photoactivation methods were investigated: stepped, ramped, pulse-delay and traditional. Specimens were longitudinally sectioned and polished for microhardness measurements (kg/mm²), which were made at 0.1, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mm from the irradiated surface. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test. RESULTS: The effect of factors studied (curing method and distance from the surface) and the interaction of these factors was statistically significant (p<0.05). The traditional method of cure provided higher microhardness values (69.6 ± 2.5) than the stepped (63.5 ± 3.1) and pulsed (63.9 ± 3.2) methods at all depths evaluated, but it did not differ from the ramped method (66.7± 4.4) at 0.1 and 1.0 mm of depth. CONCLUSION: All techniques employed provided satisfactory cure of the composite resin up to the depth of 2.0 mm from the irradiated surface.
topic Composite resins
Cure
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000500018
work_keys_str_mv AT ericsonjanoliodecamargo compositedepthofcureusingfourpolymerizationtechniques
AT eduardomoreschi compositedepthofcureusingfourpolymerizationtechniques
AT wagnerbaseggio compositedepthofcureusingfourpolymerizationtechniques
AT jaimeaparecidocury compositedepthofcureusingfourpolymerizationtechniques
AT renatacorreapascotto compositedepthofcureusingfourpolymerizationtechniques
_version_ 1716816121446793216