Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In 2000, the national cancer plan for England created 34 cancer networks, new organisational structures to coordinate services across populations varying between a half and three million people. We investigated the availability of da...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coleman Michel P, Khachatryan Artak, Sherlaw-Johnson Chris, Gonzalez-Izquierdo Arturo, McCarthy Mark, Rachet Bernard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-02-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/45
id doaj-394d18eea80f4d2aa5cd764f8ff945a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-394d18eea80f4d2aa5cd764f8ff945a52020-11-25T00:44:40ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632008-02-01814510.1186/1472-6963-8-45Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentationColeman Michel PKhachatryan ArtakSherlaw-Johnson ChrisGonzalez-Izquierdo ArturoMcCarthy MarkRachet Bernard<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In 2000, the national cancer plan for England created 34 cancer networks, new organisational structures to coordinate services across populations varying between a half and three million people. We investigated the availability of data sets reflecting measures of structure, process and outcome that could be used to support network management.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We investigated the properties of national data sets relating to four common cancers – breast, colorectal, lung and prostate. We reviewed the availability and completeness of these data sets, identified leading items within each set and put them into tables of the 34 cancer networks. We also investigated methods of presentation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Acute Hospitals Portfolio and the Cancer Standards Peer Review recorded structural characteristics at hospital and cancer service level. Process measures included Hospital Episode Statistics, recording admissions, and Hospital Waiting-List data. Patient outcome measures included the National Survey of Patient Satisfaction for cancer, and cancer survival, drawn from cancer registration. Data were drawn together to provide an exemplar indicator set a single network, and methods of graphical presentation were considered.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>While not as yet used together in practice, comparative indicators are available within the National Health Service in England for use in performance assessment by cancer networks.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/45
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Coleman Michel P
Khachatryan Artak
Sherlaw-Johnson Chris
Gonzalez-Izquierdo Arturo
McCarthy Mark
Rachet Bernard
spellingShingle Coleman Michel P
Khachatryan Artak
Sherlaw-Johnson Chris
Gonzalez-Izquierdo Arturo
McCarthy Mark
Rachet Bernard
Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Coleman Michel P
Khachatryan Artak
Sherlaw-Johnson Chris
Gonzalez-Izquierdo Arturo
McCarthy Mark
Rachet Bernard
author_sort Coleman Michel P
title Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation
title_short Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation
title_full Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation
title_fullStr Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative indicators for cancer network management in England: Availability, characteristics and presentation
title_sort comparative indicators for cancer network management in england: availability, characteristics and presentation
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2008-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In 2000, the national cancer plan for England created 34 cancer networks, new organisational structures to coordinate services across populations varying between a half and three million people. We investigated the availability of data sets reflecting measures of structure, process and outcome that could be used to support network management.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We investigated the properties of national data sets relating to four common cancers – breast, colorectal, lung and prostate. We reviewed the availability and completeness of these data sets, identified leading items within each set and put them into tables of the 34 cancer networks. We also investigated methods of presentation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The Acute Hospitals Portfolio and the Cancer Standards Peer Review recorded structural characteristics at hospital and cancer service level. Process measures included Hospital Episode Statistics, recording admissions, and Hospital Waiting-List data. Patient outcome measures included the National Survey of Patient Satisfaction for cancer, and cancer survival, drawn from cancer registration. Data were drawn together to provide an exemplar indicator set a single network, and methods of graphical presentation were considered.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>While not as yet used together in practice, comparative indicators are available within the National Health Service in England for use in performance assessment by cancer networks.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/45
work_keys_str_mv AT colemanmichelp comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation
AT khachatryanartak comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation
AT sherlawjohnsonchris comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation
AT gonzalezizquierdoarturo comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation
AT mccarthymark comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation
AT rachetbernard comparativeindicatorsforcancernetworkmanagementinenglandavailabilitycharacteristicsandpresentation
_version_ 1725274228375158784