Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience
Abstract Background Reporting quality of systematic reviews’ (SRs) abstracts is important because this is often the only information about a study that readers have. The aim of this study was to assess adherence of SR abstracts in the field of anesthesiology with the reporting checklist PRISMA exten...
Main Authors: | Katarina Maticic, Marina Krnic Martinic, Livia Puljak |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0675-2 |
Similar Items
-
There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology
by: Milagros Adobes Martin, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions
by: Francisco Gómez-García, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic reviewCapsule Summary
by: Buket Gundogan, BSc(Hons), MBBS, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis
by: Areti Angeliki Veroniki, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Compliance Ratio between the Abstracts of Iranian Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Indexed in Web of Sciences and PRISMA Statement
by: Maryam Kazerani, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)