Convergence in Total Variation of Random Sums
Let <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> be a sequence of real ran...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Mathematics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/2/194 |
id |
doaj-3964e77b78ea485baf0dc33fb177452d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Luca Pratelli Pietro Rigo |
spellingShingle |
Luca Pratelli Pietro Rigo Convergence in Total Variation of Random Sums Mathematics exchangeability random sum rate of convergence stable convergence total variation distance |
author_facet |
Luca Pratelli Pietro Rigo |
author_sort |
Luca Pratelli |
title |
Convergence in Total Variation of Random Sums |
title_short |
Convergence in Total Variation of Random Sums |
title_full |
Convergence in Total Variation of Random Sums |
title_fullStr |
Convergence in Total Variation of Random Sums |
title_full_unstemmed |
Convergence in Total Variation of Random Sums |
title_sort |
convergence in total variation of random sums |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Mathematics |
issn |
2227-7390 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Let <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> be a sequence of real random variables, <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> a sequence of random indices, and <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>τ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> a sequence of constants such that <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>τ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mi>∞</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>. The asymptotic behavior of <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>τ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow><mspace width="0.166667em"></mspace><msubsup><mo>∑</mo><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><msub><mi>T</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></msubsup><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>i</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, as <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>→</mo><mi>∞</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, is investigated when <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> is exchangeable and independent of <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>. We give conditions for <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><msqrt><msub><mi>τ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></msqrt><mspace width="0.166667em"></mspace><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>−</mo><mi>L</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>⟶</mo><mi>M</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> in distribution, where <i>L</i> and <i>M</i> are suitable random variables. Moreover, when <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> is i.i.d., we find constants <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>b</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">sup</mo><mrow><mi>A</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></msub><mspace width="0.166667em"></mspace><mrow><mo>|</mo><mrow><mi>P</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>P</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>L</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>|</mo></mrow><mo>≤</mo><msub><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">sup</mo><mrow><mi>A</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></msub><mspace width="0.166667em"></mspace><mrow><mo>|</mo><mrow><mi>P</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>P</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>M</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>|</mo></mrow><mo>≤</mo><msub><mi>b</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> for every <i>n</i>. In particular, <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mi>L</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mi>M</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> in total variation distance provided <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>b</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, as it happens in some situations. |
topic |
exchangeability random sum rate of convergence stable convergence total variation distance |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/2/194 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lucapratelli convergenceintotalvariationofrandomsums AT pietrorigo convergenceintotalvariationofrandomsums |
_version_ |
1724331538339856384 |
spelling |
doaj-3964e77b78ea485baf0dc33fb177452d2021-01-20T00:03:21ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902021-01-01919419410.3390/math9020194Convergence in Total Variation of Random SumsLuca Pratelli0Pietro Rigo1Accademia Navale, viale Italia 72, 57100 Livorno, ItalyDipartimento di Scienze Statistiche “P. Fortunati”, Università di Bologna, via delle Belle Arti 41, 40126 Bologna, ItalyLet <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> be a sequence of real random variables, <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> a sequence of random indices, and <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>τ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> a sequence of constants such that <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>τ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mi>∞</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>. The asymptotic behavior of <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><msub><mi>τ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow><mspace width="0.166667em"></mspace><msubsup><mo>∑</mo><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><msub><mi>T</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></msubsup><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>i</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, as <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>→</mo><mi>∞</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, is investigated when <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> is exchangeable and independent of <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>T</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>. We give conditions for <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><msqrt><msub><mi>τ</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></msqrt><mspace width="0.166667em"></mspace><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>−</mo><mi>L</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>⟶</mo><mi>M</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> in distribution, where <i>L</i> and <i>M</i> are suitable random variables. Moreover, when <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>X</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>)</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> is i.i.d., we find constants <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><msub><mi>b</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></semantics></math></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">sup</mo><mrow><mi>A</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></msub><mspace width="0.166667em"></mspace><mrow><mo>|</mo><mrow><mi>P</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>P</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>L</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>|</mo></mrow><mo>≤</mo><msub><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mo movablelimits="true" form="prefix">sup</mo><mrow><mi>A</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi mathvariant="script">B</mi><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></msub><mspace width="0.166667em"></mspace><mrow><mo>|</mo><mrow><mi>P</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>P</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>M</mi><mo>∈</mo><mi>A</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>|</mo></mrow><mo>≤</mo><msub><mi>b</mi><mi>n</mi></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> for every <i>n</i>. In particular, <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>L</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mi>L</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mi>M</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> in total variation distance provided <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>a</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><math display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>b</mi><mi>n</mi></msub><mo>→</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, as it happens in some situations.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/2/194exchangeabilityrandom sumrate of convergencestable convergencetotal variation distance |