Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing

Understanding geomechanical properties of rocks at multiple scales is critical and relevant in various disciplines including civil, mining, petroleum and geological engineering. Several upscaling frameworks were proposed to model elastic properties of common rock types from micro to macroscale, cons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lingyun Kong, Mehdi Ostadhassan, Siavash Zamiran, Bo Liu, Chunxiao Li, Gennaro G. Marino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/382
id doaj-3980aac95d41486794928c7f63b7a5ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3980aac95d41486794928c7f63b7a5ea2020-11-25T02:53:16ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-01-0112338210.3390/en12030382en12030382Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D PrintingLingyun Kong0Mehdi Ostadhassan1Siavash Zamiran2Bo Liu3Chunxiao Li4Gennaro G. Marino5Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USADepartment of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USAMarino Engineering Associates, Inc. St. Louis, MO 63117, USAAccumulation and Development of Unconventional Oil and Gas, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base Jointly-Constructed by Heilongjiang Province and Ministry of Science and Technology, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, ChinaHarold Hamm School of Geology and Geological Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USAMarino Engineering Associates, Inc. St. Louis, MO 63117, USAUnderstanding geomechanical properties of rocks at multiple scales is critical and relevant in various disciplines including civil, mining, petroleum and geological engineering. Several upscaling frameworks were proposed to model elastic properties of common rock types from micro to macroscale, considering the heterogeneity and anisotropy in the samples. However, direct comparison of the results from different upscaling methods remains limited, which can question their accuracy in laboratory experiments. Extreme heterogeneity of natural rocks that arises from various existing components in them adds complexity to verifying the accuracy of these upscaling methods. Therefore, experimental validation of various upscaling methods is performed by creating simple component materials, which is, in this study, examining the predicted macroscale geomechanical properties of 3D printed rocks. Nanoindentation data were first captured from 3D printed gypsum powder and binder rock fragments followed by, triaxial compression tests on similar cylindrical core plugs to acquire modulus values in micro and macroscale respectively. Mori-Tanaka (MT) scheme, Self-Consistent Scheme (SCS) method and Differential Effective Medium (DEM) theory were used to estimate Young’s modulus in macroscale based on the results of nanoindentation experiments. The comparison demonstrated that M-T and SCS methods would provide us with more comparable results than DEM method. In addition, the potential applications of 3D printed rocks were also discussed regarding rock physics and the geomechanics area in petroleum engineering and geosciences.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/382upscaling methodsgeomechanical property3D-printed rocksnanoindentationYoung’s modulus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lingyun Kong
Mehdi Ostadhassan
Siavash Zamiran
Bo Liu
Chunxiao Li
Gennaro G. Marino
spellingShingle Lingyun Kong
Mehdi Ostadhassan
Siavash Zamiran
Bo Liu
Chunxiao Li
Gennaro G. Marino
Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing
Energies
upscaling methods
geomechanical property
3D-printed rocks
nanoindentation
Young’s modulus
author_facet Lingyun Kong
Mehdi Ostadhassan
Siavash Zamiran
Bo Liu
Chunxiao Li
Gennaro G. Marino
author_sort Lingyun Kong
title Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing
title_short Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing
title_full Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing
title_fullStr Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing
title_full_unstemmed Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing
title_sort geomechanical upscaling methods: comparison and verification via 3d printing
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Understanding geomechanical properties of rocks at multiple scales is critical and relevant in various disciplines including civil, mining, petroleum and geological engineering. Several upscaling frameworks were proposed to model elastic properties of common rock types from micro to macroscale, considering the heterogeneity and anisotropy in the samples. However, direct comparison of the results from different upscaling methods remains limited, which can question their accuracy in laboratory experiments. Extreme heterogeneity of natural rocks that arises from various existing components in them adds complexity to verifying the accuracy of these upscaling methods. Therefore, experimental validation of various upscaling methods is performed by creating simple component materials, which is, in this study, examining the predicted macroscale geomechanical properties of 3D printed rocks. Nanoindentation data were first captured from 3D printed gypsum powder and binder rock fragments followed by, triaxial compression tests on similar cylindrical core plugs to acquire modulus values in micro and macroscale respectively. Mori-Tanaka (MT) scheme, Self-Consistent Scheme (SCS) method and Differential Effective Medium (DEM) theory were used to estimate Young’s modulus in macroscale based on the results of nanoindentation experiments. The comparison demonstrated that M-T and SCS methods would provide us with more comparable results than DEM method. In addition, the potential applications of 3D printed rocks were also discussed regarding rock physics and the geomechanics area in petroleum engineering and geosciences.
topic upscaling methods
geomechanical property
3D-printed rocks
nanoindentation
Young’s modulus
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/382
work_keys_str_mv AT lingyunkong geomechanicalupscalingmethodscomparisonandverificationvia3dprinting
AT mehdiostadhassan geomechanicalupscalingmethodscomparisonandverificationvia3dprinting
AT siavashzamiran geomechanicalupscalingmethodscomparisonandverificationvia3dprinting
AT boliu geomechanicalupscalingmethodscomparisonandverificationvia3dprinting
AT chunxiaoli geomechanicalupscalingmethodscomparisonandverificationvia3dprinting
AT gennarogmarino geomechanicalupscalingmethodscomparisonandverificationvia3dprinting
_version_ 1724725712204595200