The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.
Quality control (QC) of germplasm identity and purity is a critical component of breeding and conservation activities. SNP genotyping technologies and increased availability of markers provide the opportunity to employ genotyping as a low-cost and robust component of this QC. In the public sector av...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4900658?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-39b02afd21a94897a3c65e4fc4d546f7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-39b02afd21a94897a3c65e4fc4d546f72020-11-25T01:34:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015723610.1371/journal.pone.0157236The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.Jiafa ChenCristian ZavalaNoemi OrtegaCesar PetroliJorge FrancoJuan BurgueñoDenise E CostichSarah J HearneQuality control (QC) of germplasm identity and purity is a critical component of breeding and conservation activities. SNP genotyping technologies and increased availability of markers provide the opportunity to employ genotyping as a low-cost and robust component of this QC. In the public sector available low-cost SNP QC genotyping methods have been developed from a very limited panel of markers of 1,000 to 1,500 markers without broad selection of the most informative SNPs. Selection of optimal SNPs and definition of appropriate germplasm sampling in addition to platform section impact on logistical and resource-use considerations for breeding and conservation applications when mainstreaming QC. In order to address these issues, we evaluated the selection and use of SNPs for QC applications from large DArTSeq data sets generated from CIMMYT maize inbred lines (CMLs). Two QC genotyping strategies were developed, the first is a "rapid QC", employing a small number of SNPs to identify potential mislabeling of seed packages or plots, the second is a "broad QC", employing a larger number of SNP, used to identify each germplasm entry and to measure heterogeneity. The optimal marker selection strategies combined the selection of markers with high minor allele frequency, sampling of clustered SNP in proportion to marker cluster distance and selecting markers that maintain a uniform genomic distribution. The rapid and broad QC SNP panels selected using this approach were further validated using blind test assessments of related re-generation samples. The influence of sampling within each line was evaluated. Sampling 192 individuals would result in close to 100% possibility of detecting a 5% contamination in the entry, and approximately a 98% probability to detect a 2% contamination of the line. These results provide a framework for the establishment of QC genotyping. A comparison of financial and time costs for use of these approaches across different platforms is discussed providing a framework for institutions involved in maize conservation and breeding to assess the resource use effectiveness of QC genotyping. Application of these research findings, in combination with existing QC approaches, will ensure the regeneration, distribution and use in breeding of true to type inbred germplasm. These findings also provide an effective approach to optimize SNP selection for QC genotyping in other species.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4900658?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jiafa Chen Cristian Zavala Noemi Ortega Cesar Petroli Jorge Franco Juan Burgueño Denise E Costich Sarah J Hearne |
spellingShingle |
Jiafa Chen Cristian Zavala Noemi Ortega Cesar Petroli Jorge Franco Juan Burgueño Denise E Costich Sarah J Hearne The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jiafa Chen Cristian Zavala Noemi Ortega Cesar Petroli Jorge Franco Juan Burgueño Denise E Costich Sarah J Hearne |
author_sort |
Jiafa Chen |
title |
The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines. |
title_short |
The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines. |
title_full |
The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines. |
title_fullStr |
The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines. |
title_sort |
development of quality control genotyping approaches: a case study using elite maize lines. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Quality control (QC) of germplasm identity and purity is a critical component of breeding and conservation activities. SNP genotyping technologies and increased availability of markers provide the opportunity to employ genotyping as a low-cost and robust component of this QC. In the public sector available low-cost SNP QC genotyping methods have been developed from a very limited panel of markers of 1,000 to 1,500 markers without broad selection of the most informative SNPs. Selection of optimal SNPs and definition of appropriate germplasm sampling in addition to platform section impact on logistical and resource-use considerations for breeding and conservation applications when mainstreaming QC. In order to address these issues, we evaluated the selection and use of SNPs for QC applications from large DArTSeq data sets generated from CIMMYT maize inbred lines (CMLs). Two QC genotyping strategies were developed, the first is a "rapid QC", employing a small number of SNPs to identify potential mislabeling of seed packages or plots, the second is a "broad QC", employing a larger number of SNP, used to identify each germplasm entry and to measure heterogeneity. The optimal marker selection strategies combined the selection of markers with high minor allele frequency, sampling of clustered SNP in proportion to marker cluster distance and selecting markers that maintain a uniform genomic distribution. The rapid and broad QC SNP panels selected using this approach were further validated using blind test assessments of related re-generation samples. The influence of sampling within each line was evaluated. Sampling 192 individuals would result in close to 100% possibility of detecting a 5% contamination in the entry, and approximately a 98% probability to detect a 2% contamination of the line. These results provide a framework for the establishment of QC genotyping. A comparison of financial and time costs for use of these approaches across different platforms is discussed providing a framework for institutions involved in maize conservation and breeding to assess the resource use effectiveness of QC genotyping. Application of these research findings, in combination with existing QC approaches, will ensure the regeneration, distribution and use in breeding of true to type inbred germplasm. These findings also provide an effective approach to optimize SNP selection for QC genotyping in other species. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4900658?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jiafachen thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT cristianzavala thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT noemiortega thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT cesarpetroli thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT jorgefranco thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT juanburgueno thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT deniseecostich thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT sarahjhearne thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT jiafachen developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT cristianzavala developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT noemiortega developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT cesarpetroli developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT jorgefranco developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT juanburgueno developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT deniseecostich developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines AT sarahjhearne developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines |
_version_ |
1725071124265435136 |