The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.

Quality control (QC) of germplasm identity and purity is a critical component of breeding and conservation activities. SNP genotyping technologies and increased availability of markers provide the opportunity to employ genotyping as a low-cost and robust component of this QC. In the public sector av...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiafa Chen, Cristian Zavala, Noemi Ortega, Cesar Petroli, Jorge Franco, Juan Burgueño, Denise E Costich, Sarah J Hearne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4900658?pdf=render
id doaj-39b02afd21a94897a3c65e4fc4d546f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39b02afd21a94897a3c65e4fc4d546f72020-11-25T01:34:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015723610.1371/journal.pone.0157236The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.Jiafa ChenCristian ZavalaNoemi OrtegaCesar PetroliJorge FrancoJuan BurgueñoDenise E CostichSarah J HearneQuality control (QC) of germplasm identity and purity is a critical component of breeding and conservation activities. SNP genotyping technologies and increased availability of markers provide the opportunity to employ genotyping as a low-cost and robust component of this QC. In the public sector available low-cost SNP QC genotyping methods have been developed from a very limited panel of markers of 1,000 to 1,500 markers without broad selection of the most informative SNPs. Selection of optimal SNPs and definition of appropriate germplasm sampling in addition to platform section impact on logistical and resource-use considerations for breeding and conservation applications when mainstreaming QC. In order to address these issues, we evaluated the selection and use of SNPs for QC applications from large DArTSeq data sets generated from CIMMYT maize inbred lines (CMLs). Two QC genotyping strategies were developed, the first is a "rapid QC", employing a small number of SNPs to identify potential mislabeling of seed packages or plots, the second is a "broad QC", employing a larger number of SNP, used to identify each germplasm entry and to measure heterogeneity. The optimal marker selection strategies combined the selection of markers with high minor allele frequency, sampling of clustered SNP in proportion to marker cluster distance and selecting markers that maintain a uniform genomic distribution. The rapid and broad QC SNP panels selected using this approach were further validated using blind test assessments of related re-generation samples. The influence of sampling within each line was evaluated. Sampling 192 individuals would result in close to 100% possibility of detecting a 5% contamination in the entry, and approximately a 98% probability to detect a 2% contamination of the line. These results provide a framework for the establishment of QC genotyping. A comparison of financial and time costs for use of these approaches across different platforms is discussed providing a framework for institutions involved in maize conservation and breeding to assess the resource use effectiveness of QC genotyping. Application of these research findings, in combination with existing QC approaches, will ensure the regeneration, distribution and use in breeding of true to type inbred germplasm. These findings also provide an effective approach to optimize SNP selection for QC genotyping in other species.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4900658?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiafa Chen
Cristian Zavala
Noemi Ortega
Cesar Petroli
Jorge Franco
Juan Burgueño
Denise E Costich
Sarah J Hearne
spellingShingle Jiafa Chen
Cristian Zavala
Noemi Ortega
Cesar Petroli
Jorge Franco
Juan Burgueño
Denise E Costich
Sarah J Hearne
The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jiafa Chen
Cristian Zavala
Noemi Ortega
Cesar Petroli
Jorge Franco
Juan Burgueño
Denise E Costich
Sarah J Hearne
author_sort Jiafa Chen
title The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.
title_short The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.
title_full The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.
title_fullStr The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.
title_full_unstemmed The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.
title_sort development of quality control genotyping approaches: a case study using elite maize lines.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Quality control (QC) of germplasm identity and purity is a critical component of breeding and conservation activities. SNP genotyping technologies and increased availability of markers provide the opportunity to employ genotyping as a low-cost and robust component of this QC. In the public sector available low-cost SNP QC genotyping methods have been developed from a very limited panel of markers of 1,000 to 1,500 markers without broad selection of the most informative SNPs. Selection of optimal SNPs and definition of appropriate germplasm sampling in addition to platform section impact on logistical and resource-use considerations for breeding and conservation applications when mainstreaming QC. In order to address these issues, we evaluated the selection and use of SNPs for QC applications from large DArTSeq data sets generated from CIMMYT maize inbred lines (CMLs). Two QC genotyping strategies were developed, the first is a "rapid QC", employing a small number of SNPs to identify potential mislabeling of seed packages or plots, the second is a "broad QC", employing a larger number of SNP, used to identify each germplasm entry and to measure heterogeneity. The optimal marker selection strategies combined the selection of markers with high minor allele frequency, sampling of clustered SNP in proportion to marker cluster distance and selecting markers that maintain a uniform genomic distribution. The rapid and broad QC SNP panels selected using this approach were further validated using blind test assessments of related re-generation samples. The influence of sampling within each line was evaluated. Sampling 192 individuals would result in close to 100% possibility of detecting a 5% contamination in the entry, and approximately a 98% probability to detect a 2% contamination of the line. These results provide a framework for the establishment of QC genotyping. A comparison of financial and time costs for use of these approaches across different platforms is discussed providing a framework for institutions involved in maize conservation and breeding to assess the resource use effectiveness of QC genotyping. Application of these research findings, in combination with existing QC approaches, will ensure the regeneration, distribution and use in breeding of true to type inbred germplasm. These findings also provide an effective approach to optimize SNP selection for QC genotyping in other species.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4900658?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jiafachen thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT cristianzavala thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT noemiortega thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT cesarpetroli thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT jorgefranco thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT juanburgueno thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT deniseecostich thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT sarahjhearne thedevelopmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT jiafachen developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT cristianzavala developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT noemiortega developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT cesarpetroli developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT jorgefranco developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT juanburgueno developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT deniseecostich developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
AT sarahjhearne developmentofqualitycontrolgenotypingapproachesacasestudyusingelitemaizelines
_version_ 1725071124265435136