Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage

One of the most common methods adopted in the rehabilitation of corrosion-damaged concrete is the patch repair procedure. However, in practice this method has shown to often be unreliable as a consequence of the widespread occurrence of shrinkage induced cracking and poor substrate-patch adhesion le...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jassa Primesh, Beushausen Hans, Tchetgnia Ngassam Ines
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819907017
id doaj-39b085dd08514fab9e84321bc21fd938
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39b085dd08514fab9e84321bc21fd9382021-02-02T03:10:07ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011990701710.1051/matecconf/201819907017matecconf_iccrrr2018_07017Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damageJassa Primesh0Beushausen Hans1Tchetgnia Ngassam Ines2Concrete research and structural integrity research unit (CoMSIRU), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town (UCT)Concrete research and structural integrity research unit (CoMSIRU), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town (UCT)Concrete research and structural integrity research unit (CoMSIRU), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town (UCT)One of the most common methods adopted in the rehabilitation of corrosion-damaged concrete is the patch repair procedure. However, in practice this method has shown to often be unreliable as a consequence of the widespread occurrence of shrinkage induced cracking and poor substrate-patch adhesion leading to debonding of the patch repair. From a practical point of view, such failed repair systems essentially restore the repaired concrete back to a deteriorated state. There is a common belief that repairing concrete with specialised proprietary repair materials would guarantee durability. However, the widespread premature failure of patch repairs conducted using such materials has proven the contrary. This paper presents an understanding of the materials and issues concerning the durability and serviceability of concrete patch repairs, with the aim of identifying alternative non-structural patch repair materials for the effective repair of corrosion-damaged concrete structures. The potential patch repair materials researched were polymer-cement concrete (copolymer of vinyl acetate and ethylene with 5% cement replacement) and 60%, 80% and 100% fly ash (FA) mortar. Patch repairs were conducted on substrate moulds to test application and observe cracking/debonding occurrence. Furthermore, compressive strength, durability index, accelerated drying shrinkage, restrained shrinkage, workability and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tests were conducted to determine the properties of the materials developed with reference to performance requirements of durable concrete repairs. It was concluded that the 60% FA and polymer-cement concrete repair materials had the best overall performance. This research established that innovative alternative repair materials such as a 60% FA or polymer-cement concrete material, can be developed for non-structural patch repairs with improved long-term performance relative to conventional materials.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819907017
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jassa Primesh
Beushausen Hans
Tchetgnia Ngassam Ines
spellingShingle Jassa Primesh
Beushausen Hans
Tchetgnia Ngassam Ines
Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Jassa Primesh
Beushausen Hans
Tchetgnia Ngassam Ines
author_sort Jassa Primesh
title Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage
title_short Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage
title_full Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage
title_fullStr Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage
title_full_unstemmed Alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage
title_sort alternative patch repair materials for rebar corrosion damage
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description One of the most common methods adopted in the rehabilitation of corrosion-damaged concrete is the patch repair procedure. However, in practice this method has shown to often be unreliable as a consequence of the widespread occurrence of shrinkage induced cracking and poor substrate-patch adhesion leading to debonding of the patch repair. From a practical point of view, such failed repair systems essentially restore the repaired concrete back to a deteriorated state. There is a common belief that repairing concrete with specialised proprietary repair materials would guarantee durability. However, the widespread premature failure of patch repairs conducted using such materials has proven the contrary. This paper presents an understanding of the materials and issues concerning the durability and serviceability of concrete patch repairs, with the aim of identifying alternative non-structural patch repair materials for the effective repair of corrosion-damaged concrete structures. The potential patch repair materials researched were polymer-cement concrete (copolymer of vinyl acetate and ethylene with 5% cement replacement) and 60%, 80% and 100% fly ash (FA) mortar. Patch repairs were conducted on substrate moulds to test application and observe cracking/debonding occurrence. Furthermore, compressive strength, durability index, accelerated drying shrinkage, restrained shrinkage, workability and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tests were conducted to determine the properties of the materials developed with reference to performance requirements of durable concrete repairs. It was concluded that the 60% FA and polymer-cement concrete repair materials had the best overall performance. This research established that innovative alternative repair materials such as a 60% FA or polymer-cement concrete material, can be developed for non-structural patch repairs with improved long-term performance relative to conventional materials.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819907017
work_keys_str_mv AT jassaprimesh alternativepatchrepairmaterialsforrebarcorrosiondamage
AT beushausenhans alternativepatchrepairmaterialsforrebarcorrosiondamage
AT tchetgniangassamines alternativepatchrepairmaterialsforrebarcorrosiondamage
_version_ 1724308472881741824