Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review
The relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status has been widely explored in the literature. A deeper understanding toward the underlying mechanism is required to further assist policy makers in reducing the inequalities. The objective of this study is to systematically review evidence inv...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PAGEPress Publications
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Public Health Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2036 |
id |
doaj-39dc4dea7707484d93ca8c062c0e2041 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-39dc4dea7707484d93ca8c062c0e20412021-05-01T08:13:49ZengPAGEPress PublicationsJournal of Public Health Research2279-90282279-90362021-04-0110.4081/jphr.2021.2036Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic reviewJiunn Wang0Claire Hulme1University of Exeter Medical School, ExeterUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter The relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status has been widely explored in the literature. A deeper understanding toward the underlying mechanism is required to further assist policy makers in reducing the inequalities. The objective of this study is to systematically review evidence investigating the direct relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status. The review was conducted following the principles of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Among the included studies, 52.38% explored the pattern of frailty in age and 42.86% explored mediators as the pathway variables. With various measures and methodologies, included studies did not point to the same conclusions. In terms of the pattern of frailty in age, we found evidence for the age as leveller hypothesis, the status maintenance hypothesis and the cumulative advantage hypothesis. The included mediators differed across studies. However, we found that these mediators can be categorised into behaviours, health, social factors, material resources and mental status. These categories indicate the important aspects to consider for policies aiming at reducing the inequalities in frailty. To obtain a full picture of the underlying mechanism, future research should harmonise different measures for frailty and socioeconomic indicators and apply more comprehensive sets of mediators. https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2036Frailtysocioeconomic statusageing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jiunn Wang Claire Hulme |
spellingShingle |
Jiunn Wang Claire Hulme Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review Journal of Public Health Research Frailty socioeconomic status ageing |
author_facet |
Jiunn Wang Claire Hulme |
author_sort |
Jiunn Wang |
title |
Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review |
title_short |
Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review |
title_full |
Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review |
title_sort |
frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review |
publisher |
PAGEPress Publications |
series |
Journal of Public Health Research |
issn |
2279-9028 2279-9036 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
The relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status has been widely explored in the literature. A deeper understanding toward the underlying mechanism is required to further assist policy makers in reducing the inequalities. The objective of this study is to systematically review evidence investigating the direct relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status. The review was conducted following the principles of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Among the included studies, 52.38% explored the pattern of frailty in age and 42.86% explored mediators as the pathway variables. With various measures and methodologies, included studies did not point to the same conclusions. In terms of the pattern of frailty in age, we found evidence for the age as leveller hypothesis, the status maintenance hypothesis and the cumulative advantage hypothesis. The included mediators differed across studies. However, we found that these mediators can be categorised into behaviours, health, social factors, material resources and mental status. These categories indicate the important aspects to consider for policies aiming at reducing the inequalities in frailty. To obtain a full picture of the underlying mechanism, future research should harmonise different measures for frailty and socioeconomic indicators and apply more comprehensive sets of mediators.
|
topic |
Frailty socioeconomic status ageing |
url |
https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2036 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jiunnwang frailtyandsocioeconomicstatusasystematicreview AT clairehulme frailtyandsocioeconomicstatusasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1721496911456763904 |