Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review

The relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status has been widely explored in the literature. A deeper understanding toward the underlying mechanism is required to further assist policy makers in reducing the inequalities. The objective of this study is to systematically review evidence inv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiunn Wang, Claire Hulme
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of Public Health Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2036
id doaj-39dc4dea7707484d93ca8c062c0e2041
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39dc4dea7707484d93ca8c062c0e20412021-05-01T08:13:49ZengPAGEPress PublicationsJournal of Public Health Research2279-90282279-90362021-04-0110.4081/jphr.2021.2036Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic reviewJiunn Wang0Claire Hulme1University of Exeter Medical School, ExeterUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter The relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status has been widely explored in the literature. A deeper understanding toward the underlying mechanism is required to further assist policy makers in reducing the inequalities. The objective of this study is to systematically review evidence investigating the direct relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status. The review was conducted following the principles of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Among the included studies, 52.38% explored the pattern of frailty in age and 42.86% explored mediators as the pathway variables. With various measures and methodologies, included studies did not point to the same conclusions. In terms of the pattern of frailty in age, we found evidence for the age as leveller hypothesis, the status maintenance hypothesis and the cumulative advantage hypothesis. The included mediators differed across studies. However, we found that these mediators can be categorised into behaviours, health, social factors, material resources and mental status. These categories indicate the important aspects to consider for policies aiming at reducing the inequalities in frailty. To obtain a full picture of the underlying mechanism, future research should harmonise different measures for frailty and socioeconomic indicators and apply more comprehensive sets of mediators. https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2036Frailtysocioeconomic statusageing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiunn Wang
Claire Hulme
spellingShingle Jiunn Wang
Claire Hulme
Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review
Journal of Public Health Research
Frailty
socioeconomic status
ageing
author_facet Jiunn Wang
Claire Hulme
author_sort Jiunn Wang
title Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_short Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_full Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_fullStr Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_sort frailty and socioeconomic status: a systematic review
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Journal of Public Health Research
issn 2279-9028
2279-9036
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status has been widely explored in the literature. A deeper understanding toward the underlying mechanism is required to further assist policy makers in reducing the inequalities. The objective of this study is to systematically review evidence investigating the direct relationship between frailty and socioeconomic status. The review was conducted following the principles of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Among the included studies, 52.38% explored the pattern of frailty in age and 42.86% explored mediators as the pathway variables. With various measures and methodologies, included studies did not point to the same conclusions. In terms of the pattern of frailty in age, we found evidence for the age as leveller hypothesis, the status maintenance hypothesis and the cumulative advantage hypothesis. The included mediators differed across studies. However, we found that these mediators can be categorised into behaviours, health, social factors, material resources and mental status. These categories indicate the important aspects to consider for policies aiming at reducing the inequalities in frailty. To obtain a full picture of the underlying mechanism, future research should harmonise different measures for frailty and socioeconomic indicators and apply more comprehensive sets of mediators.
topic Frailty
socioeconomic status
ageing
url https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2036
work_keys_str_mv AT jiunnwang frailtyandsocioeconomicstatusasystematicreview
AT clairehulme frailtyandsocioeconomicstatusasystematicreview
_version_ 1721496911456763904