Intercomparisons of HIRDLS, COSMIC and SABER for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves

Colocated temperature profiles from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC), High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS) and the Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) mission are compared over the years 2006–2007 to asse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. J. Wright, M. B. Rivas, J. C. Gille
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-08-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/4/1581/2011/amt-4-1581-2011.pdf
id doaj-39fab449006c45c8b2f15d3ba8acf619
record_format Article
spelling doaj-39fab449006c45c8b2f15d3ba8acf6192020-11-24T22:43:13ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482011-08-01481581159110.5194/amt-4-1581-2011Intercomparisons of HIRDLS, COSMIC and SABER for the detection of stratospheric gravity wavesC. J. WrightM. B. RivasJ. C. GilleColocated temperature profiles from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC), High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS) and the Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) mission are compared over the years 2006–2007 to assess their relative performances for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves. Two methods are used, one based on a simple comparison of the standard deviations and correlation coefficients of high-pass filtered profiles from each instrument, and the other based on Stockwell transform analyses of the profiles for vertical wavelength and temperature perturbation scales. It is concluded, when allowing for their different vertical resolution capabilites, that the three instruments reproduce each other's results for magnitude and vertical scale of perturbations to within their resolution limits in approximately 50 % of cases, but with a positive frequency and temperature bias in the case of COSMIC. This is possibly indicative of a slightly higher vertical resolution being available to the constellation than estimated.http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/4/1581/2011/amt-4-1581-2011.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. J. Wright
M. B. Rivas
J. C. Gille
spellingShingle C. J. Wright
M. B. Rivas
J. C. Gille
Intercomparisons of HIRDLS, COSMIC and SABER for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet C. J. Wright
M. B. Rivas
J. C. Gille
author_sort C. J. Wright
title Intercomparisons of HIRDLS, COSMIC and SABER for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves
title_short Intercomparisons of HIRDLS, COSMIC and SABER for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves
title_full Intercomparisons of HIRDLS, COSMIC and SABER for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves
title_fullStr Intercomparisons of HIRDLS, COSMIC and SABER for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves
title_full_unstemmed Intercomparisons of HIRDLS, COSMIC and SABER for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves
title_sort intercomparisons of hirdls, cosmic and saber for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2011-08-01
description Colocated temperature profiles from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC), High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS) and the Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) mission are compared over the years 2006–2007 to assess their relative performances for the detection of stratospheric gravity waves. Two methods are used, one based on a simple comparison of the standard deviations and correlation coefficients of high-pass filtered profiles from each instrument, and the other based on Stockwell transform analyses of the profiles for vertical wavelength and temperature perturbation scales. It is concluded, when allowing for their different vertical resolution capabilites, that the three instruments reproduce each other's results for magnitude and vertical scale of perturbations to within their resolution limits in approximately 50 % of cases, but with a positive frequency and temperature bias in the case of COSMIC. This is possibly indicative of a slightly higher vertical resolution being available to the constellation than estimated.
url http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/4/1581/2011/amt-4-1581-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cjwright intercomparisonsofhirdlscosmicandsaberforthedetectionofstratosphericgravitywaves
AT mbrivas intercomparisonsofhirdlscosmicandsaberforthedetectionofstratosphericgravitywaves
AT jcgille intercomparisonsofhirdlscosmicandsaberforthedetectionofstratosphericgravitywaves
_version_ 1725696920608833536