Is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]

Suvorexant is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) newly introduced in the U.S. as a hypnotic, but no claim of superiority over other hypnotics has been offered.  The manufacturer argued that the 5 and 10 mg starting doses recommended by the FDA might be ineffective.  The manufacturer'...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel F. Kripke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2015-08-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://f1000research.com/articles/4-456/v1
id doaj-3a1a6f30a08b4e96b8dfd102b97df4fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a1a6f30a08b4e96b8dfd102b97df4fc2020-11-25T03:24:42ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022015-08-01410.12688/f1000research.6845.17359Is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]Daniel F. Kripke0Scripps Clinic Viterbi Family Sleep Center, La Jolla, CA, USASuvorexant is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) newly introduced in the U.S. as a hypnotic, but no claim of superiority over other hypnotics has been offered.  The manufacturer argued that the 5 and 10 mg starting doses recommended by the FDA might be ineffective.  The manufacturer's main Phase III trials had not even included the 10 mg dosage, and the 5 mg dosage had not been tested at all in registered clinical trials at the time of approval.  Popular alternative hypnotics may be similarly ineffective, since the FDA has also reduced the recommended doses for zolpidem and eszopiclone.  The "not to exceed" suvorexant dosage of 20 mg does slightly increase sleep.  Because of slow absorption, suvorexant has little effect on latency to sleep onset but some small effect in suppressing wakening after sleep onset and in improving sleep efficiency. The FDA would not approve the manufacturer's preferred 40 mg suvorexant dosage, because of concern with daytime somnolence, driving impairment, and possible narcolepsy-like symptoms.  In its immediate benefits-to-risks ratio, suvorexant is unlikely to prove superior to currently available hypnotics—possibly worse—so there is little reason to prefer over the alternatives this likely more expensive hypnotic less-tested in practice.  Associations are being increasingly documented relating hypnotic usage with incident cancer, with dementia risks, and with premature death.  There is some basis to speculate that suvorexant might be safer than alternative hypnotics in terms of cancer, dementia, infections, and mortality.  These safety considerations will remain unproven speculations unless adequate long-term trials can be done that demonstrate suvorexant advantages.http://f1000research.com/articles/4-456/v1Neuronal Signaling MechanismsNeuropharmacology & Psychopharmacology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel F. Kripke
spellingShingle Daniel F. Kripke
Is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
F1000Research
Neuronal Signaling Mechanisms
Neuropharmacology & Psychopharmacology
author_facet Daniel F. Kripke
author_sort Daniel F. Kripke
title Is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
title_short Is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
title_full Is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
title_sort is suvorexant a better choice than alternative hypnotics? [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2015-08-01
description Suvorexant is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) newly introduced in the U.S. as a hypnotic, but no claim of superiority over other hypnotics has been offered.  The manufacturer argued that the 5 and 10 mg starting doses recommended by the FDA might be ineffective.  The manufacturer's main Phase III trials had not even included the 10 mg dosage, and the 5 mg dosage had not been tested at all in registered clinical trials at the time of approval.  Popular alternative hypnotics may be similarly ineffective, since the FDA has also reduced the recommended doses for zolpidem and eszopiclone.  The "not to exceed" suvorexant dosage of 20 mg does slightly increase sleep.  Because of slow absorption, suvorexant has little effect on latency to sleep onset but some small effect in suppressing wakening after sleep onset and in improving sleep efficiency. The FDA would not approve the manufacturer's preferred 40 mg suvorexant dosage, because of concern with daytime somnolence, driving impairment, and possible narcolepsy-like symptoms.  In its immediate benefits-to-risks ratio, suvorexant is unlikely to prove superior to currently available hypnotics—possibly worse—so there is little reason to prefer over the alternatives this likely more expensive hypnotic less-tested in practice.  Associations are being increasingly documented relating hypnotic usage with incident cancer, with dementia risks, and with premature death.  There is some basis to speculate that suvorexant might be safer than alternative hypnotics in terms of cancer, dementia, infections, and mortality.  These safety considerations will remain unproven speculations unless adequate long-term trials can be done that demonstrate suvorexant advantages.
topic Neuronal Signaling Mechanisms
Neuropharmacology & Psychopharmacology
url http://f1000research.com/articles/4-456/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT danielfkripke issuvorexantabetterchoicethanalternativehypnoticsversion1referees2approved
_version_ 1724600472321392640