Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation

Background: An implanted device for brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS® System) is approved as an effective treatment to reduce seizures in adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Clinical trials of the RNS System demonstrate population-level reduction in average seizure frequency, but...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharon Chiang, Ankit N. Khambhati, Emily T. Wang, Marina Vannucci, Edward F. Chang, Vikram R. Rao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
RNS
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21000280
id doaj-3a2d77a023954147b584f00edef1779d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a2d77a023954147b584f00edef1779d2021-03-19T07:23:38ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2021-03-01142366375Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulationSharon Chiang0Ankit N. Khambhati1Emily T. Wang2Marina Vannucci3Edward F. Chang4Vikram R. Rao5Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States; Corresponding author. University of California, San Francisco, Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States.Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX, United StatesDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesDepartment of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United StatesBackground: An implanted device for brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS® System) is approved as an effective treatment to reduce seizures in adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Clinical trials of the RNS System demonstrate population-level reduction in average seizure frequency, but therapeutic response is highly variable. Hypothesis: Recent evidence links seizures to cyclical fluctuations in underlying risk. We tested the hypothesis that effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation varies based on current state within cyclical risk fluctuations. Methods: We analyzed retrospective data from 25 adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy implanted with the RNS System. Chronic electrocorticography was used to record electrographic seizures, and hidden Markov models decoded seizures into fluctuations in underlying risk. State-dependent associations of RNS System stimulation parameters with changes in risk were estimated. Results: Higher charge density was associated with improved outcomes, both for remaining in a low seizure risk state and for transitioning from a high to a low seizure risk state. The effect of stimulation frequency depended on initial seizure risk state: when starting in a low risk state, higher stimulation frequencies were associated with remaining in a low risk state, but when starting in a high risk state, lower stimulation frequencies were associated with transition to a low risk state. Findings were consistent across bipolar and monopolar stimulation configurations. Conclusion: The impact of RNS on seizure frequency exhibits state-dependence, such that stimulation parameters which are effective in one seizure risk state may not be effective in another. These findings represent conceptual advances in understanding the therapeutic mechanism of RNS, and directly inform current practices of RNS tuning and the development of next-generation neurostimulation systems.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21000280RNSEpilepsyElectrocorticographySeizure riskNeuromodulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sharon Chiang
Ankit N. Khambhati
Emily T. Wang
Marina Vannucci
Edward F. Chang
Vikram R. Rao
spellingShingle Sharon Chiang
Ankit N. Khambhati
Emily T. Wang
Marina Vannucci
Edward F. Chang
Vikram R. Rao
Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation
Brain Stimulation
RNS
Epilepsy
Electrocorticography
Seizure risk
Neuromodulation
author_facet Sharon Chiang
Ankit N. Khambhati
Emily T. Wang
Marina Vannucci
Edward F. Chang
Vikram R. Rao
author_sort Sharon Chiang
title Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation
title_short Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation
title_full Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation
title_fullStr Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation
title_sort evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation
publisher Elsevier
series Brain Stimulation
issn 1935-861X
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Background: An implanted device for brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS® System) is approved as an effective treatment to reduce seizures in adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Clinical trials of the RNS System demonstrate population-level reduction in average seizure frequency, but therapeutic response is highly variable. Hypothesis: Recent evidence links seizures to cyclical fluctuations in underlying risk. We tested the hypothesis that effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation varies based on current state within cyclical risk fluctuations. Methods: We analyzed retrospective data from 25 adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy implanted with the RNS System. Chronic electrocorticography was used to record electrographic seizures, and hidden Markov models decoded seizures into fluctuations in underlying risk. State-dependent associations of RNS System stimulation parameters with changes in risk were estimated. Results: Higher charge density was associated with improved outcomes, both for remaining in a low seizure risk state and for transitioning from a high to a low seizure risk state. The effect of stimulation frequency depended on initial seizure risk state: when starting in a low risk state, higher stimulation frequencies were associated with remaining in a low risk state, but when starting in a high risk state, lower stimulation frequencies were associated with transition to a low risk state. Findings were consistent across bipolar and monopolar stimulation configurations. Conclusion: The impact of RNS on seizure frequency exhibits state-dependence, such that stimulation parameters which are effective in one seizure risk state may not be effective in another. These findings represent conceptual advances in understanding the therapeutic mechanism of RNS, and directly inform current practices of RNS tuning and the development of next-generation neurostimulation systems.
topic RNS
Epilepsy
Electrocorticography
Seizure risk
Neuromodulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21000280
work_keys_str_mv AT sharonchiang evidenceofstatedependenceintheeffectivenessofresponsiveneurostimulationforseizuremodulation
AT ankitnkhambhati evidenceofstatedependenceintheeffectivenessofresponsiveneurostimulationforseizuremodulation
AT emilytwang evidenceofstatedependenceintheeffectivenessofresponsiveneurostimulationforseizuremodulation
AT marinavannucci evidenceofstatedependenceintheeffectivenessofresponsiveneurostimulationforseizuremodulation
AT edwardfchang evidenceofstatedependenceintheeffectivenessofresponsiveneurostimulationforseizuremodulation
AT vikramrrao evidenceofstatedependenceintheeffectivenessofresponsiveneurostimulationforseizuremodulation
_version_ 1724213402125991936