Life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocol
Abstract Background In this article, conceptualization of well-being is a starting point. According to Diener, subjective well-being refers to all kinds of evaluation, both positive and negative, people make about their own lives. It includes cognitive assessments, such as satisfaction with life and...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0903-6 |
id |
doaj-3a7e9de6bff341419fb298a7cdc4022c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3a7e9de6bff341419fb298a7cdc4022c2020-11-24T21:22:38ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532018-12-01711610.1186/s13643-018-0903-6Life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocolViviane Cruvinel Di Castro0Janete Capel Hernandes1Mauro Elias Mendonça2Celmo Celeno Porto3Faculdade de Medicina. Programa Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de GoiásFaculdade de Medicina. Programa Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de GoiásFaculdade de Medicina. Programa Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de GoiásFaculdade de Medicina. Programa Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de GoiásAbstract Background In this article, conceptualization of well-being is a starting point. According to Diener, subjective well-being refers to all kinds of evaluation, both positive and negative, people make about their own lives. It includes cognitive assessments, such as satisfaction with life and satisfaction with work, as well as affective reactions to life events, such as sadness and contentment. Low levels of health and well-being in workers lead to many consequences. Sick leave, low productivity, and absenteeism are some examples. In this systematic review, the main objective is to assess workers’ subjective well-being. Methods The studies should include workers, whether they are paid or volunteers. Also, they must assess workers’ subjective well-being. Observational peer-reviewed studies will be included. Qualitative studies will be excluded. The primary outcomes to be considered are the subjective well-being indicators described. Only studies that used six (6) instruments, developed by Diener, will be included. The instruments are Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), Positive Thinking Scale (PTS), Flourishing Scale (FS), Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT), and Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). The studies will come from Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), Portal da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus databases. The studies must be written in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. Discussion As far as we know, this is the first systematic review related specially to workers’ subjective well-being. We hope that this study contributes to the “well-being at work” discussion and also to the development of effective interventions, used outside and inside organizations, that could improve well-being scores and increase correlate variables scores such as general health, social relations, and quality of life. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42016039520http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0903-6Subjective well-beingWorkerSystematic reviewProtocol |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Viviane Cruvinel Di Castro Janete Capel Hernandes Mauro Elias Mendonça Celmo Celeno Porto |
spellingShingle |
Viviane Cruvinel Di Castro Janete Capel Hernandes Mauro Elias Mendonça Celmo Celeno Porto Life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocol Systematic Reviews Subjective well-being Worker Systematic review Protocol |
author_facet |
Viviane Cruvinel Di Castro Janete Capel Hernandes Mauro Elias Mendonça Celmo Celeno Porto |
author_sort |
Viviane Cruvinel Di Castro |
title |
Life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocol |
title_short |
Life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocol |
title_full |
Life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr |
Life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort |
life satisfaction and positive and negative feelings of workers: a systematic review protocol |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Systematic Reviews |
issn |
2046-4053 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background In this article, conceptualization of well-being is a starting point. According to Diener, subjective well-being refers to all kinds of evaluation, both positive and negative, people make about their own lives. It includes cognitive assessments, such as satisfaction with life and satisfaction with work, as well as affective reactions to life events, such as sadness and contentment. Low levels of health and well-being in workers lead to many consequences. Sick leave, low productivity, and absenteeism are some examples. In this systematic review, the main objective is to assess workers’ subjective well-being. Methods The studies should include workers, whether they are paid or volunteers. Also, they must assess workers’ subjective well-being. Observational peer-reviewed studies will be included. Qualitative studies will be excluded. The primary outcomes to be considered are the subjective well-being indicators described. Only studies that used six (6) instruments, developed by Diener, will be included. The instruments are Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), Positive Thinking Scale (PTS), Flourishing Scale (FS), Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT), and Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). The studies will come from Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), Portal da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus databases. The studies must be written in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. Discussion As far as we know, this is the first systematic review related specially to workers’ subjective well-being. We hope that this study contributes to the “well-being at work” discussion and also to the development of effective interventions, used outside and inside organizations, that could improve well-being scores and increase correlate variables scores such as general health, social relations, and quality of life. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42016039520 |
topic |
Subjective well-being Worker Systematic review Protocol |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0903-6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vivianecruvineldicastro lifesatisfactionandpositiveandnegativefeelingsofworkersasystematicreviewprotocol AT janetecapelhernandes lifesatisfactionandpositiveandnegativefeelingsofworkersasystematicreviewprotocol AT mauroeliasmendonca lifesatisfactionandpositiveandnegativefeelingsofworkersasystematicreviewprotocol AT celmocelenoporto lifesatisfactionandpositiveandnegativefeelingsofworkersasystematicreviewprotocol |
_version_ |
1725994935409180672 |