Biodiversity in Music Scores

Nature has inspired music since the dawn of humankind and has contributed to the creation and development of music as an art form. However, attempts to use the science of nature (i.e., quantitative ecology) to inform music as a broader art-science system is comparatively underdeveloped. In this pape...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David G. Angeler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Challenges
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/11/1/7
id doaj-3a8b7ba657674bd3901c1844a1c94281
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3a8b7ba657674bd3901c1844a1c942812020-11-25T02:11:11ZengMDPI AGChallenges2078-15472020-05-01117710.3390/challe11010007Biodiversity in Music ScoresDavid G. Angeler0Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7050, 750 07 Uppsala, SwedenNature has inspired music since the dawn of humankind and has contributed to the creation and development of music as an art form. However, attempts to use the science of nature (i.e., quantitative ecology) to inform music as a broader art-science system is comparatively underdeveloped. In this paper an approach from biodiversity assessments is borrowed to quantify structural diversity in music scores. The approach is analogous in its nature and considers notations with distinct pitches and duration as equivalents of species in ecosystems, measures within a score as equivalents of ecosystems, and the sum of measures (i.e., the entire score) as a landscape in which ecosystems are embedded. Structural diversity can be calculated at the level of measures (“alpha diversity”) and the entire score (“gamma diversity”). An additional metric can be derived that quantifies the structural differentiation between measures in a score (“beta diversity”). The approach is demonstrated using music scores that vary in complexity. The method seems particularly suitable for hypothesis testing to objectively identify many of the intricate phenomena in music. For instance, questions related to the variability within and between musical genres or among individual composers can be addressed. Another potential application is an assessment of ontogenetic structural variability in the works of composers during their lifetime. Such information can then be contrasted with other cultural, psychological, and historical variables, among others. This study shows the opportunities that music and ecology offer for interdisciplinary research to broaden our knowledge of complex systems of people and nature.https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/11/1/7quantitative musicologybiodiversityecologyinterdisciplinary researchmusic analysisart-science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David G. Angeler
spellingShingle David G. Angeler
Biodiversity in Music Scores
Challenges
quantitative musicology
biodiversity
ecology
interdisciplinary research
music analysis
art-science
author_facet David G. Angeler
author_sort David G. Angeler
title Biodiversity in Music Scores
title_short Biodiversity in Music Scores
title_full Biodiversity in Music Scores
title_fullStr Biodiversity in Music Scores
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity in Music Scores
title_sort biodiversity in music scores
publisher MDPI AG
series Challenges
issn 2078-1547
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Nature has inspired music since the dawn of humankind and has contributed to the creation and development of music as an art form. However, attempts to use the science of nature (i.e., quantitative ecology) to inform music as a broader art-science system is comparatively underdeveloped. In this paper an approach from biodiversity assessments is borrowed to quantify structural diversity in music scores. The approach is analogous in its nature and considers notations with distinct pitches and duration as equivalents of species in ecosystems, measures within a score as equivalents of ecosystems, and the sum of measures (i.e., the entire score) as a landscape in which ecosystems are embedded. Structural diversity can be calculated at the level of measures (“alpha diversity”) and the entire score (“gamma diversity”). An additional metric can be derived that quantifies the structural differentiation between measures in a score (“beta diversity”). The approach is demonstrated using music scores that vary in complexity. The method seems particularly suitable for hypothesis testing to objectively identify many of the intricate phenomena in music. For instance, questions related to the variability within and between musical genres or among individual composers can be addressed. Another potential application is an assessment of ontogenetic structural variability in the works of composers during their lifetime. Such information can then be contrasted with other cultural, psychological, and historical variables, among others. This study shows the opportunities that music and ecology offer for interdisciplinary research to broaden our knowledge of complex systems of people and nature.
topic quantitative musicology
biodiversity
ecology
interdisciplinary research
music analysis
art-science
url https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/11/1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT davidgangeler biodiversityinmusicscores
_version_ 1724915799697653760