Passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on task

Abstract Background Experimental designs using surrogate gait-like movements, such as in functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cannot fully capture the cortical activation associated with overground gait. Overground gait in a robotic exoskeleton may be an ideal tool to generate controlled sen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sue Peters, Shannon B. Lim, Dennis R. Louie, Chieh-ling Yang, Janice J. Eng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00739-6
id doaj-3ab0153332d94b7fbcfbfa511c5425b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ab0153332d94b7fbcfbfa511c5425b92020-11-25T03:04:42ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032020-08-0117111210.1186/s12984-020-00739-6Passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on taskSue Peters0Shannon B. Lim1Dennis R. Louie2Chieh-ling Yang3Janice J. Eng4Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British ColumbiaRehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteRehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British ColumbiaAbstract Background Experimental designs using surrogate gait-like movements, such as in functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cannot fully capture the cortical activation associated with overground gait. Overground gait in a robotic exoskeleton may be an ideal tool to generate controlled sensorimotor stimulation of gait conditions like ‘active’ (i.e. user moves with the device) and ‘passive’ (i.e. user is moved by the device) gait. To truly understand these neural mechanisms, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) would yield greater ecological validity. Thus, the aim of this experiment was to use fNIRS to delineate brain activation differences between ‘Active’ and ‘Passive’ overground gait in a robotic exoskeleton. Methods Fourteen healthy adults performed 10 walking trials in a robotic exoskeleton for Passive and Active conditions, with fNIRS over bilateral frontal and parietal lobes, and electromyography (EMG) over bilateral thigh muscles. Digitization of optode locations and individual T1 MRI scans were used to demarcate the brain regions fNIRS recorded from. Results Increased oxyhemoglobin in the right frontal cortex was found for Passive compared with Active conditions. For deoxyhemoglobin, increased activation during Passive was found in the left frontal cortex and bilateral parietal cortices compared with Active; one channel in the left parietal cortex decreased during Active when compared with Passive. Normalized EMG mean amplitude was higher in the Active compared with Passive conditions for all four muscles (p ≤ 0.044), confirming participants produced the conditions asked of them. Conclusions The parietal cortex is active during passive robotic exoskeleton gait, a novel finding as research to date has not recorded posterior to the primary somatosensory cortex. Increased activation of the parietal cortex may be related to the planning of limb coordination while maintaining postural control. Future neurorehabilitation research could use fNIRS to examine whether exoskeletal gait training can increase gait-related brain activation with individuals unable to walk independently.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00739-6Functional near-infrared spectroscopyGaitParietal cortexDeoxyhemoglobinOxyhemoglobin
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sue Peters
Shannon B. Lim
Dennis R. Louie
Chieh-ling Yang
Janice J. Eng
spellingShingle Sue Peters
Shannon B. Lim
Dennis R. Louie
Chieh-ling Yang
Janice J. Eng
Passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on task
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Gait
Parietal cortex
Deoxyhemoglobin
Oxyhemoglobin
author_facet Sue Peters
Shannon B. Lim
Dennis R. Louie
Chieh-ling Yang
Janice J. Eng
author_sort Sue Peters
title Passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on task
title_short Passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on task
title_full Passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on task
title_fullStr Passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on task
title_full_unstemmed Passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on task
title_sort passive, yet not inactive: robotic exoskeleton walking increases cortical activation dependent on task
publisher BMC
series Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
issn 1743-0003
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background Experimental designs using surrogate gait-like movements, such as in functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cannot fully capture the cortical activation associated with overground gait. Overground gait in a robotic exoskeleton may be an ideal tool to generate controlled sensorimotor stimulation of gait conditions like ‘active’ (i.e. user moves with the device) and ‘passive’ (i.e. user is moved by the device) gait. To truly understand these neural mechanisms, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) would yield greater ecological validity. Thus, the aim of this experiment was to use fNIRS to delineate brain activation differences between ‘Active’ and ‘Passive’ overground gait in a robotic exoskeleton. Methods Fourteen healthy adults performed 10 walking trials in a robotic exoskeleton for Passive and Active conditions, with fNIRS over bilateral frontal and parietal lobes, and electromyography (EMG) over bilateral thigh muscles. Digitization of optode locations and individual T1 MRI scans were used to demarcate the brain regions fNIRS recorded from. Results Increased oxyhemoglobin in the right frontal cortex was found for Passive compared with Active conditions. For deoxyhemoglobin, increased activation during Passive was found in the left frontal cortex and bilateral parietal cortices compared with Active; one channel in the left parietal cortex decreased during Active when compared with Passive. Normalized EMG mean amplitude was higher in the Active compared with Passive conditions for all four muscles (p ≤ 0.044), confirming participants produced the conditions asked of them. Conclusions The parietal cortex is active during passive robotic exoskeleton gait, a novel finding as research to date has not recorded posterior to the primary somatosensory cortex. Increased activation of the parietal cortex may be related to the planning of limb coordination while maintaining postural control. Future neurorehabilitation research could use fNIRS to examine whether exoskeletal gait training can increase gait-related brain activation with individuals unable to walk independently.
topic Functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Gait
Parietal cortex
Deoxyhemoglobin
Oxyhemoglobin
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12984-020-00739-6
work_keys_str_mv AT suepeters passiveyetnotinactiveroboticexoskeletonwalkingincreasescorticalactivationdependentontask
AT shannonblim passiveyetnotinactiveroboticexoskeletonwalkingincreasescorticalactivationdependentontask
AT dennisrlouie passiveyetnotinactiveroboticexoskeletonwalkingincreasescorticalactivationdependentontask
AT chiehlingyang passiveyetnotinactiveroboticexoskeletonwalkingincreasescorticalactivationdependentontask
AT janicejeng passiveyetnotinactiveroboticexoskeletonwalkingincreasescorticalactivationdependentontask
_version_ 1724680172184010752