Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: A comparative prospective study of 30 cases

Background: Uncomplicated diaphyseal fractures of the humerus successfully healed in over 90% of cases when treated conservatively by reduction and immobilization. Open reduction with internal fixation, is preferred for open, segmental and pathological fractures. Objective: To compare functional ou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Subhash R Puri, Samar K Biswas, Anil Salgia, Sahil Sanghi, Tushar Aggarwal, Ashish Kohli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mjdrdypu.org/article.asp?issn=0975-2870;year=2013;volume=6;issue=1;spage=49;epage=54;aulast=Puri
id doaj-3aeb67fbec2f4bd1b74d4f3c0e188a3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3aeb67fbec2f4bd1b74d4f3c0e188a3f2020-11-24T22:10:03ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsMedical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University0975-28702013-01-0161495410.4103/0975-2870.108641Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: A comparative prospective study of 30 casesSubhash R PuriSamar K BiswasAnil SalgiaSahil SanghiTushar AggarwalAshish KohliBackground: Uncomplicated diaphyseal fractures of the humerus successfully healed in over 90% of cases when treated conservatively by reduction and immobilization. Open reduction with internal fixation, is preferred for open, segmental and pathological fractures. Objective: To compare functional outcomes, union and complication rates in patients treated with locked intramedullary nailing or dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. Materials and Methods: We randomized prospectively 30 patients with fractures of the shaft of the humerus were treated by open reduction and internal fixation by dynamic compression plate (DCP) in 15 cases and closed reduction and internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail in 15 cases. Patients were followed up for a minimum of six months. Result: There were no significant differences in the function of the shoulder and elbow, as determined by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons′ score, the visual analogue pain score, range of movement, or the time taken to return to normal activity. In our study, complications in DCP and IMN groups common were radial nerve injury and shoulder impingement. We had to perform secondary surgery on four patients in the IMN group, but on only one in the DCP group. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that open reduction and internal fixation with a DCP remains a better treatment option for fractures of the shaft humerus. Fixation by IMN may be indicated for specific situations, but is technically more demanding and has a higher rate of complications.http://www.mjdrdypu.org/article.asp?issn=0975-2870;year=2013;volume=6;issue=1;spage=49;epage=54;aulast=PuriClosed intra medullary locking naildynamic compression platefracture shaft humerus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Subhash R Puri
Samar K Biswas
Anil Salgia
Sahil Sanghi
Tushar Aggarwal
Ashish Kohli
spellingShingle Subhash R Puri
Samar K Biswas
Anil Salgia
Sahil Sanghi
Tushar Aggarwal
Ashish Kohli
Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: A comparative prospective study of 30 cases
Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University
Closed intra medullary locking nail
dynamic compression plate
fracture shaft humerus
author_facet Subhash R Puri
Samar K Biswas
Anil Salgia
Sahil Sanghi
Tushar Aggarwal
Ashish Kohli
author_sort Subhash R Puri
title Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: A comparative prospective study of 30 cases
title_short Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: A comparative prospective study of 30 cases
title_full Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: A comparative prospective study of 30 cases
title_fullStr Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: A comparative prospective study of 30 cases
title_full_unstemmed Operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: A comparative prospective study of 30 cases
title_sort operative management of fracture of shaft humerus by dynamic compression plate versus interlocking intramedullary nailing: a comparative prospective study of 30 cases
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University
issn 0975-2870
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Background: Uncomplicated diaphyseal fractures of the humerus successfully healed in over 90% of cases when treated conservatively by reduction and immobilization. Open reduction with internal fixation, is preferred for open, segmental and pathological fractures. Objective: To compare functional outcomes, union and complication rates in patients treated with locked intramedullary nailing or dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. Materials and Methods: We randomized prospectively 30 patients with fractures of the shaft of the humerus were treated by open reduction and internal fixation by dynamic compression plate (DCP) in 15 cases and closed reduction and internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail in 15 cases. Patients were followed up for a minimum of six months. Result: There were no significant differences in the function of the shoulder and elbow, as determined by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons′ score, the visual analogue pain score, range of movement, or the time taken to return to normal activity. In our study, complications in DCP and IMN groups common were radial nerve injury and shoulder impingement. We had to perform secondary surgery on four patients in the IMN group, but on only one in the DCP group. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that open reduction and internal fixation with a DCP remains a better treatment option for fractures of the shaft humerus. Fixation by IMN may be indicated for specific situations, but is technically more demanding and has a higher rate of complications.
topic Closed intra medullary locking nail
dynamic compression plate
fracture shaft humerus
url http://www.mjdrdypu.org/article.asp?issn=0975-2870;year=2013;volume=6;issue=1;spage=49;epage=54;aulast=Puri
work_keys_str_mv AT subhashrpuri operativemanagementoffractureofshafthumerusbydynamiccompressionplateversusinterlockingintramedullarynailingacomparativeprospectivestudyof30cases
AT samarkbiswas operativemanagementoffractureofshafthumerusbydynamiccompressionplateversusinterlockingintramedullarynailingacomparativeprospectivestudyof30cases
AT anilsalgia operativemanagementoffractureofshafthumerusbydynamiccompressionplateversusinterlockingintramedullarynailingacomparativeprospectivestudyof30cases
AT sahilsanghi operativemanagementoffractureofshafthumerusbydynamiccompressionplateversusinterlockingintramedullarynailingacomparativeprospectivestudyof30cases
AT tusharaggarwal operativemanagementoffractureofshafthumerusbydynamiccompressionplateversusinterlockingintramedullarynailingacomparativeprospectivestudyof30cases
AT ashishkohli operativemanagementoffractureofshafthumerusbydynamiccompressionplateversusinterlockingintramedullarynailingacomparativeprospectivestudyof30cases
_version_ 1725809548715884544