Engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: Interactions in Indonesian students’ writings

This study reports the use of engagement in high-rated and low-rated EFL undergraduate students’ argumentative essays. The engagement here refers to one of the aspects in interacting with the readers, which is called metadiscourse (Hyland, 2005a). The data in this study were ten highest-rated and te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anis Handayani, Nur Arifah Drajati, N. Ngadiso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 2020-06-01
Series:Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/24957
id doaj-3b2029066c8a45bca20d5f8f78692303
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3b2029066c8a45bca20d5f8f786923032020-11-25T03:52:16ZengUniversitas Pendidikan IndonesiaIndonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics2301-94682502-67472020-06-01101142410.17509/ijal.v10i1.2495712331Engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: Interactions in Indonesian students’ writingsAnis Handayani0Nur Arifah Drajati1N. Ngadiso2Graduate school of English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir Sutami 36A ,Surakarta, Central Java, IndonesiaGraduate school of English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir Sutami 36A ,Surakarta, Central Java, IndonesiaGraduate school of English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jl. Ir Sutami 36A ,Surakarta, Central Java, IndonesiaThis study reports the use of engagement in high-rated and low-rated EFL undergraduate students’ argumentative essays. The engagement here refers to one of the aspects in interacting with the readers, which is called metadiscourse (Hyland, 2005a). The data in this study were ten highest-rated and ten lowest-rated argumentative essays written by first-year undergraduate students. The data were coded manually by two raters to maintain data validity. The results reveal that high-rated essays contain less engagement than low-rated ones. However, it also shows that the engagement in high-rated essays was more varied and grammatically sophisticated than those in low-rated essays. Furthermore, while this study reveals that the higher number of engagement used in argumentative essays does not always coincide with the improved quality of the writing, it implies that the writing quality and score do not depend on the number of engagement expressed but more on the ways students use the engagement effectively. Thus, the explicit teaching on how to use engagement effectively in persuasive writings may be useful for the students to build more persuasive arguments as well as to improve their writing quality.https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/24957academic writingengagementinteractionmetadiscourse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anis Handayani
Nur Arifah Drajati
N. Ngadiso
spellingShingle Anis Handayani
Nur Arifah Drajati
N. Ngadiso
Engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: Interactions in Indonesian students’ writings
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
academic writing
engagement
interaction
metadiscourse
author_facet Anis Handayani
Nur Arifah Drajati
N. Ngadiso
author_sort Anis Handayani
title Engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: Interactions in Indonesian students’ writings
title_short Engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: Interactions in Indonesian students’ writings
title_full Engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: Interactions in Indonesian students’ writings
title_fullStr Engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: Interactions in Indonesian students’ writings
title_full_unstemmed Engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: Interactions in Indonesian students’ writings
title_sort engagement in high- and low-rated argumentative essays: interactions in indonesian students’ writings
publisher Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
series Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
issn 2301-9468
2502-6747
publishDate 2020-06-01
description This study reports the use of engagement in high-rated and low-rated EFL undergraduate students’ argumentative essays. The engagement here refers to one of the aspects in interacting with the readers, which is called metadiscourse (Hyland, 2005a). The data in this study were ten highest-rated and ten lowest-rated argumentative essays written by first-year undergraduate students. The data were coded manually by two raters to maintain data validity. The results reveal that high-rated essays contain less engagement than low-rated ones. However, it also shows that the engagement in high-rated essays was more varied and grammatically sophisticated than those in low-rated essays. Furthermore, while this study reveals that the higher number of engagement used in argumentative essays does not always coincide with the improved quality of the writing, it implies that the writing quality and score do not depend on the number of engagement expressed but more on the ways students use the engagement effectively. Thus, the explicit teaching on how to use engagement effectively in persuasive writings may be useful for the students to build more persuasive arguments as well as to improve their writing quality.
topic academic writing
engagement
interaction
metadiscourse
url https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/24957
work_keys_str_mv AT anishandayani engagementinhighandlowratedargumentativeessaysinteractionsinindonesianstudentswritings
AT nurarifahdrajati engagementinhighandlowratedargumentativeessaysinteractionsinindonesianstudentswritings
AT nngadiso engagementinhighandlowratedargumentativeessaysinteractionsinindonesianstudentswritings
_version_ 1724483187307970560