Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization.

Digitization of the natural history specimens usually occurs by taking detailed pictures from different sides or producing 3D models. Additionally this is normally limited to imaging the specimen while exposed by light of the visual spectrum. However many specimens can see in or react to other spect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan Brecko, Aurore Mathys, Wouter Dekoninck, Marleen De Ceukelaire, Didier VandenSpiegel, Patrick Semal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4990233?pdf=render
id doaj-3b2069e5030c4810ac80c4deead3e72f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3b2069e5030c4810ac80c4deead3e72f2020-11-25T02:47:04ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01118e016157210.1371/journal.pone.0161572Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization.Jonathan BreckoAurore MathysWouter DekoninckMarleen De CeukelaireDidier VandenSpiegelPatrick SemalDigitization of the natural history specimens usually occurs by taking detailed pictures from different sides or producing 3D models. Additionally this is normally limited to imaging the specimen while exposed by light of the visual spectrum. However many specimens can see in or react to other spectra as well. Fluorescence is a well known reaction to the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum by animals, plants, minerals etc. but rarely taken into account while examining natural history specimens. Our tests show that museum specimens still fluoresce when exposed to UV light of 395 nm and 365 nm, even after many years of preservation. When the UV exposure is used in the digitization of specimens using our low cost focus stacking (2D+) setup, the resulting pictures reveal more detail than the conventional 2D+ images. Differences in fluorescence using 395 nm or 365 nm UV lights were noticed, however there isn't a preferred wavelength as some specimens react more to the first, while others have better results with the latter exposure. Given the increased detail and the low cost of the system, UV exposure should be considered while digitizing natural history museum collections.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4990233?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan Brecko
Aurore Mathys
Wouter Dekoninck
Marleen De Ceukelaire
Didier VandenSpiegel
Patrick Semal
spellingShingle Jonathan Brecko
Aurore Mathys
Wouter Dekoninck
Marleen De Ceukelaire
Didier VandenSpiegel
Patrick Semal
Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jonathan Brecko
Aurore Mathys
Wouter Dekoninck
Marleen De Ceukelaire
Didier VandenSpiegel
Patrick Semal
author_sort Jonathan Brecko
title Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization.
title_short Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization.
title_full Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization.
title_fullStr Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization.
title_full_unstemmed Revealing Invisible Beauty, Ultra Detailed: The Influence of Low Cost UV Exposure on Natural History Specimens in 2D+ Digitization.
title_sort revealing invisible beauty, ultra detailed: the influence of low cost uv exposure on natural history specimens in 2d+ digitization.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Digitization of the natural history specimens usually occurs by taking detailed pictures from different sides or producing 3D models. Additionally this is normally limited to imaging the specimen while exposed by light of the visual spectrum. However many specimens can see in or react to other spectra as well. Fluorescence is a well known reaction to the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum by animals, plants, minerals etc. but rarely taken into account while examining natural history specimens. Our tests show that museum specimens still fluoresce when exposed to UV light of 395 nm and 365 nm, even after many years of preservation. When the UV exposure is used in the digitization of specimens using our low cost focus stacking (2D+) setup, the resulting pictures reveal more detail than the conventional 2D+ images. Differences in fluorescence using 395 nm or 365 nm UV lights were noticed, however there isn't a preferred wavelength as some specimens react more to the first, while others have better results with the latter exposure. Given the increased detail and the low cost of the system, UV exposure should be considered while digitizing natural history museum collections.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4990233?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanbrecko revealinginvisiblebeautyultradetailedtheinfluenceoflowcostuvexposureonnaturalhistoryspecimensin2ddigitization
AT auroremathys revealinginvisiblebeautyultradetailedtheinfluenceoflowcostuvexposureonnaturalhistoryspecimensin2ddigitization
AT wouterdekoninck revealinginvisiblebeautyultradetailedtheinfluenceoflowcostuvexposureonnaturalhistoryspecimensin2ddigitization
AT marleendeceukelaire revealinginvisiblebeautyultradetailedtheinfluenceoflowcostuvexposureonnaturalhistoryspecimensin2ddigitization
AT didiervandenspiegel revealinginvisiblebeautyultradetailedtheinfluenceoflowcostuvexposureonnaturalhistoryspecimensin2ddigitization
AT patricksemal revealinginvisiblebeautyultradetailedtheinfluenceoflowcostuvexposureonnaturalhistoryspecimensin2ddigitization
_version_ 1724754843676966912