Further Tests of the Metacognitive Advantage Model: Counterfactuals, Confidence and Affect
This study tested whether people have an accurate sense of how good their reasoning is, as measured by their confidence in their responses, and how good they feel after they give those responses. First, incorrect responders were unjustifiably confident in their responses. However, correct responders...
Main Author: | André Mata |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Rijeka
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Psychological Topics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pt.ffri.hr/pt/article/view/521 |
Similar Items
-
Further Tests of the Metacognitive Advantage Model: Counterfactuals, Confidence and Affect
by: André Mata
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Too Imperfect to Fall Asleep: Perfectionism, Pre-sleep Counterfactual Processing, and Insomnia
by: Ralph E. Schmidt, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Pitfalls of counterfactual thinking in medical practice: preventing errors by using more functional reference points
by: John V. Petrocelli
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Regret, Relief, and Counterfactual Thinking: The Effect of Outcome Valence on Counterfactual Thinking
by: Fenderson, Carl R.
Published: (2014) -
Counterfactual Reasoning in Non-psychotic First-Degree Relatives of People with Schizophrenia
by: Auria eAlbacete, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01)