Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China

In this study, we examined whether private benefits of control can influence corporate social responsibility performance. We used both separations between cash flow and control rights and the length of the longest control chain to measure private benefits of control. Consistent with the private bene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiang Liu, Guoqing Ge, Chong Ning, Xiaobo Tao, Yongbo Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3309
id doaj-3b81fcc36c874253bc47caa8b29703aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3b81fcc36c874253bc47caa8b29703aa2020-11-25T00:47:43ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-09-01109330910.3390/su10093309su10093309Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from ChinaQiang Liu0Guoqing Ge1Chong Ning2Xiaobo Tao3Yongbo Sun4School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaSchool of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, ChinaBusiness School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 102488, ChinaIn this study, we examined whether private benefits of control can influence corporate social responsibility performance. We used both separations between cash flow and control rights and the length of the longest control chain to measure private benefits of control. Consistent with the private benefits motive, we found that firms with greater divergence between cash-flow rights and control rights, with longer control chains, are associated with lower corporate social responsibility performance. Further, we found that earnings management and capital occupation by the controlling shareholder are the two effective channels through which private benefits of control affect corporate social responsibility. Additionally, this negative association is more pronounced for firms located in regions with low degree of law environment and with CEOs appointed by the largest shareholder. Additional robustness tests using alternative CSR measurements, and two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression support the main findings. This study highlights a new determination channel of private benefits of control and practically guides the introduction of corporate social responsibility activities in emerging markets.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3309private benefits of controlshareholdercorporate social responsibility performancesustainable development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qiang Liu
Guoqing Ge
Chong Ning
Xiaobo Tao
Yongbo Sun
spellingShingle Qiang Liu
Guoqing Ge
Chong Ning
Xiaobo Tao
Yongbo Sun
Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China
Sustainability
private benefits of control
shareholder
corporate social responsibility performance
sustainable development
author_facet Qiang Liu
Guoqing Ge
Chong Ning
Xiaobo Tao
Yongbo Sun
author_sort Qiang Liu
title Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China
title_short Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China
title_full Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China
title_fullStr Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China
title_full_unstemmed Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China
title_sort do private benefits of control affect corporate social responsibility? evidence from china
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-09-01
description In this study, we examined whether private benefits of control can influence corporate social responsibility performance. We used both separations between cash flow and control rights and the length of the longest control chain to measure private benefits of control. Consistent with the private benefits motive, we found that firms with greater divergence between cash-flow rights and control rights, with longer control chains, are associated with lower corporate social responsibility performance. Further, we found that earnings management and capital occupation by the controlling shareholder are the two effective channels through which private benefits of control affect corporate social responsibility. Additionally, this negative association is more pronounced for firms located in regions with low degree of law environment and with CEOs appointed by the largest shareholder. Additional robustness tests using alternative CSR measurements, and two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression support the main findings. This study highlights a new determination channel of private benefits of control and practically guides the introduction of corporate social responsibility activities in emerging markets.
topic private benefits of control
shareholder
corporate social responsibility performance
sustainable development
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3309
work_keys_str_mv AT qiangliu doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina
AT guoqingge doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina
AT chongning doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina
AT xiaobotao doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina
AT yongbosun doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina
_version_ 1725259046543425536