Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China
In this study, we examined whether private benefits of control can influence corporate social responsibility performance. We used both separations between cash flow and control rights and the length of the longest control chain to measure private benefits of control. Consistent with the private bene...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3309 |
id |
doaj-3b81fcc36c874253bc47caa8b29703aa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3b81fcc36c874253bc47caa8b29703aa2020-11-25T00:47:43ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-09-01109330910.3390/su10093309su10093309Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from ChinaQiang Liu0Guoqing Ge1Chong Ning2Xiaobo Tao3Yongbo Sun4School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaSchool of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, ChinaBusiness School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 102488, ChinaIn this study, we examined whether private benefits of control can influence corporate social responsibility performance. We used both separations between cash flow and control rights and the length of the longest control chain to measure private benefits of control. Consistent with the private benefits motive, we found that firms with greater divergence between cash-flow rights and control rights, with longer control chains, are associated with lower corporate social responsibility performance. Further, we found that earnings management and capital occupation by the controlling shareholder are the two effective channels through which private benefits of control affect corporate social responsibility. Additionally, this negative association is more pronounced for firms located in regions with low degree of law environment and with CEOs appointed by the largest shareholder. Additional robustness tests using alternative CSR measurements, and two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression support the main findings. This study highlights a new determination channel of private benefits of control and practically guides the introduction of corporate social responsibility activities in emerging markets.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3309private benefits of controlshareholdercorporate social responsibility performancesustainable development |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Qiang Liu Guoqing Ge Chong Ning Xiaobo Tao Yongbo Sun |
spellingShingle |
Qiang Liu Guoqing Ge Chong Ning Xiaobo Tao Yongbo Sun Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China Sustainability private benefits of control shareholder corporate social responsibility performance sustainable development |
author_facet |
Qiang Liu Guoqing Ge Chong Ning Xiaobo Tao Yongbo Sun |
author_sort |
Qiang Liu |
title |
Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China |
title_short |
Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China |
title_full |
Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China |
title_fullStr |
Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do Private Benefits of Control Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China |
title_sort |
do private benefits of control affect corporate social responsibility? evidence from china |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
In this study, we examined whether private benefits of control can influence corporate social responsibility performance. We used both separations between cash flow and control rights and the length of the longest control chain to measure private benefits of control. Consistent with the private benefits motive, we found that firms with greater divergence between cash-flow rights and control rights, with longer control chains, are associated with lower corporate social responsibility performance. Further, we found that earnings management and capital occupation by the controlling shareholder are the two effective channels through which private benefits of control affect corporate social responsibility. Additionally, this negative association is more pronounced for firms located in regions with low degree of law environment and with CEOs appointed by the largest shareholder. Additional robustness tests using alternative CSR measurements, and two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression support the main findings. This study highlights a new determination channel of private benefits of control and practically guides the introduction of corporate social responsibility activities in emerging markets. |
topic |
private benefits of control shareholder corporate social responsibility performance sustainable development |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3309 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT qiangliu doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina AT guoqingge doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina AT chongning doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina AT xiaobotao doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina AT yongbosun doprivatebenefitsofcontrolaffectcorporatesocialresponsibilityevidencefromchina |
_version_ |
1725259046543425536 |