Effects of Ammonia Stripping and Other Physico-Chemical Pretreatments on Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Wastewater

In order to overcome anaerobic digestion (AD) inhibition due to the large nitrogen content of swine wastewater (SW), air stripping (AS) and other chemical and physical pretreatments were applied on raw SW before AD. The efficiency of these pretreatments on both ammonia removal—recovering ammonia sal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adele Folino, Paolo Salvatore Calabrò, Demetrio Antonio Zema
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3413
id doaj-3ba0fb3694d943b1a34fcde555209eba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3ba0fb3694d943b1a34fcde555209eba2020-11-25T03:15:23ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-07-01133413341310.3390/en13133413Effects of Ammonia Stripping and Other Physico-Chemical Pretreatments on Anaerobic Digestion of Swine WastewaterAdele Folino0Paolo Salvatore Calabrò1Demetrio Antonio Zema2Department “AGRARIA”, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, I-89122 Reggio Calabria, ItalyDepartment “DICEAM”, Via Graziella, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, I-89124 Reggio Calabria, ItalyDepartment “AGRARIA”, Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, I-89122 Reggio Calabria, ItalyIn order to overcome anaerobic digestion (AD) inhibition due to the large nitrogen content of swine wastewater (SW), air stripping (AS) and other chemical and physical pretreatments were applied on raw SW before AD. The efficiency of these pretreatments on both ammonia removal—recovering ammonia salts to be used as fertilizers in agriculture—and the increase of methane production were assessed in batch tests. Since the pH, temperature, and air flow rate heavily influence AS efficiency and the composition of treated SW, these parameters were set individually or in combination. In more detail, the pH was increased from the natural value of SW to 8 or 10, temperature was increased from the room value to 40 °C, and the air flow rate was increased from zero to 5 Lair L<sub>SW</sub><sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>. AS was generally more efficient at removing ammonia (up to 97%) from raw (non-treated) SW compared to the other treatments. However, the tested pretreatments were not as efficient as expected in increasing the biogas production, because the methane yields of all pretreated substrates were lower (by about 10–50%) to compared raw SW. The inhibitory effect on AD could have been due to the lack of nutrients and organic matter in the substrate (due to the excessive removal of the pretreatments), the concentration of toxic compounds (such as metal ions or furfural due to water evaporation), and an excess of alkali ions (used to increase the pH in AS). Overall, AS can be considered a sustainable process for the recovery of ammonium sulphate and the removal of other polluting compounds (e.g., organic matter) from SW. Conversely, the use of AS and other chemical and/or thermal processes tested in this study as pretreatments of SW before AD is not advised because these processes appear to reduce methane yields.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3413air strippingmethane productionenergy recoveryammonium sulphateammonia removal efficiencydigestate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adele Folino
Paolo Salvatore Calabrò
Demetrio Antonio Zema
spellingShingle Adele Folino
Paolo Salvatore Calabrò
Demetrio Antonio Zema
Effects of Ammonia Stripping and Other Physico-Chemical Pretreatments on Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Wastewater
Energies
air stripping
methane production
energy recovery
ammonium sulphate
ammonia removal efficiency
digestate
author_facet Adele Folino
Paolo Salvatore Calabrò
Demetrio Antonio Zema
author_sort Adele Folino
title Effects of Ammonia Stripping and Other Physico-Chemical Pretreatments on Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Wastewater
title_short Effects of Ammonia Stripping and Other Physico-Chemical Pretreatments on Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Wastewater
title_full Effects of Ammonia Stripping and Other Physico-Chemical Pretreatments on Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Wastewater
title_fullStr Effects of Ammonia Stripping and Other Physico-Chemical Pretreatments on Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Wastewater
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Ammonia Stripping and Other Physico-Chemical Pretreatments on Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Wastewater
title_sort effects of ammonia stripping and other physico-chemical pretreatments on anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-07-01
description In order to overcome anaerobic digestion (AD) inhibition due to the large nitrogen content of swine wastewater (SW), air stripping (AS) and other chemical and physical pretreatments were applied on raw SW before AD. The efficiency of these pretreatments on both ammonia removal—recovering ammonia salts to be used as fertilizers in agriculture—and the increase of methane production were assessed in batch tests. Since the pH, temperature, and air flow rate heavily influence AS efficiency and the composition of treated SW, these parameters were set individually or in combination. In more detail, the pH was increased from the natural value of SW to 8 or 10, temperature was increased from the room value to 40 °C, and the air flow rate was increased from zero to 5 Lair L<sub>SW</sub><sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>. AS was generally more efficient at removing ammonia (up to 97%) from raw (non-treated) SW compared to the other treatments. However, the tested pretreatments were not as efficient as expected in increasing the biogas production, because the methane yields of all pretreated substrates were lower (by about 10–50%) to compared raw SW. The inhibitory effect on AD could have been due to the lack of nutrients and organic matter in the substrate (due to the excessive removal of the pretreatments), the concentration of toxic compounds (such as metal ions or furfural due to water evaporation), and an excess of alkali ions (used to increase the pH in AS). Overall, AS can be considered a sustainable process for the recovery of ammonium sulphate and the removal of other polluting compounds (e.g., organic matter) from SW. Conversely, the use of AS and other chemical and/or thermal processes tested in this study as pretreatments of SW before AD is not advised because these processes appear to reduce methane yields.
topic air stripping
methane production
energy recovery
ammonium sulphate
ammonia removal efficiency
digestate
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/13/3413
work_keys_str_mv AT adelefolino effectsofammoniastrippingandotherphysicochemicalpretreatmentsonanaerobicdigestionofswinewastewater
AT paolosalvatorecalabro effectsofammoniastrippingandotherphysicochemicalpretreatmentsonanaerobicdigestionofswinewastewater
AT demetrioantoniozema effectsofammoniastrippingandotherphysicochemicalpretreatmentsonanaerobicdigestionofswinewastewater
_version_ 1724639875858169856