Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humans

Abstract Background Admixture between early modern humans and Neandertals approximately 50,000–60,000 years ago has resulted in 1.5–4% Neandertal ancestry in the genomes of present-day non-Africans. Evidence is accumulating that some of these archaic alleles are advantageous for modern humans, while...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Dannemann, Kay Prüfer, Janet Kelso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-04-01
Series:Genome Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-017-1181-7
id doaj-3bcc556c69384efd9e49ba24b4895b11
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3bcc556c69384efd9e49ba24b4895b112020-11-24T21:10:31ZengBMCGenome Biology1474-760X2017-04-0118111110.1186/s13059-017-1181-7Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humansMichael Dannemann0Kay Prüfer1Janet Kelso2Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyAbstract Background Admixture between early modern humans and Neandertals approximately 50,000–60,000 years ago has resulted in 1.5–4% Neandertal ancestry in the genomes of present-day non-Africans. Evidence is accumulating that some of these archaic alleles are advantageous for modern humans, while others are deleterious; however, the major mechanism by which these archaic alleles act has not been fully explored. Results Here we assess the contributions of introgressed non-synonymous and regulatory variants to modern human protein and gene expression variation. We show that gene expression changes are more often associated with Neandertal ancestry than expected, and that the introgressed non-synonymous variants tend to have less predicted functional effect on modern human proteins than mutations that arose on the human lineage. Conversely, introgressed alleles contribute proportionally more to expression variation than non-introgressed alleles. Conclusions Our results suggest that the major influence of Neandertal introgressed alleles is through their effects on gene regulation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-017-1181-7Neandertal introgressionGene expression regulationProtein sequence variationHuman evolution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Dannemann
Kay Prüfer
Janet Kelso
spellingShingle Michael Dannemann
Kay Prüfer
Janet Kelso
Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humans
Genome Biology
Neandertal introgression
Gene expression regulation
Protein sequence variation
Human evolution
author_facet Michael Dannemann
Kay Prüfer
Janet Kelso
author_sort Michael Dannemann
title Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humans
title_short Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humans
title_full Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humans
title_fullStr Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humans
title_full_unstemmed Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humans
title_sort functional implications of neandertal introgression in modern humans
publisher BMC
series Genome Biology
issn 1474-760X
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Abstract Background Admixture between early modern humans and Neandertals approximately 50,000–60,000 years ago has resulted in 1.5–4% Neandertal ancestry in the genomes of present-day non-Africans. Evidence is accumulating that some of these archaic alleles are advantageous for modern humans, while others are deleterious; however, the major mechanism by which these archaic alleles act has not been fully explored. Results Here we assess the contributions of introgressed non-synonymous and regulatory variants to modern human protein and gene expression variation. We show that gene expression changes are more often associated with Neandertal ancestry than expected, and that the introgressed non-synonymous variants tend to have less predicted functional effect on modern human proteins than mutations that arose on the human lineage. Conversely, introgressed alleles contribute proportionally more to expression variation than non-introgressed alleles. Conclusions Our results suggest that the major influence of Neandertal introgressed alleles is through their effects on gene regulation.
topic Neandertal introgression
Gene expression regulation
Protein sequence variation
Human evolution
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13059-017-1181-7
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeldannemann functionalimplicationsofneandertalintrogressioninmodernhumans
AT kayprufer functionalimplicationsofneandertalintrogressioninmodernhumans
AT janetkelso functionalimplicationsofneandertalintrogressioninmodernhumans
_version_ 1716756278415458304