Engineering Simulation Tests on Multiphase Flow in Middle- and High-Yield Slanted Well Bores

Previous multiphase pipe flow tests have mainly been conducted in horizontal and vertical pipes, with few tests conducted on multiphase pipe flow under different inclined angles. In this study, in light of mid–high yield and highly deviated wells in the Middle East and on the basis of exis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dan Qi, Honglan Zou, Yunhong Ding, Wei Luo, Junzheng Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2591
id doaj-3bd6173015b945f28ab1564a6f34b07f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3bd6173015b945f28ab1564a6f34b07f2020-11-24T20:51:44ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732018-09-011110259110.3390/en11102591en11102591Engineering Simulation Tests on Multiphase Flow in Middle- and High-Yield Slanted Well BoresDan Qi0Honglan Zou1Yunhong Ding2Wei Luo3Junzheng Yang4School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaPetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, ChinaPetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, ChinaThe Branch of Key Laboratory of CNPC for Oil and Gas Production, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430115, ChinaPetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, ChinaPrevious multiphase pipe flow tests have mainly been conducted in horizontal and vertical pipes, with few tests conducted on multiphase pipe flow under different inclined angles. In this study, in light of mid–high yield and highly deviated wells in the Middle East and on the basis of existent multiphase flow pressure research on well bores, multiphase pipe flow tests were conducted under different inclined angles, liquid rates, and gas rates. A pressure prediction model based on Mukherjee model, but with new coefficients and higher accuracy for well bores in the study block, was obtained. It was verified that the newly built pressure drawdown prediction model tallies better with experimental data, with an error of only 11.3%. The effect of inclination, output, and gas rate on the flow pattern, liquid holdup, and friction in the course of multiphase flow were analyzed comprehensively, and six kinds of classical flow regime maps were verified with this model. The results showed that for annular and slug flow, the Mukherjee flow pattern map had a higher accuracy of 100% and 80–100%, respectively. For transition flow, Duns and Ros flow pattern map had a higher accuracy of 46–66%.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2591wellbore multiphase flowinclined angleliquid rategas ratepressure drawdown model with new coefficients
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dan Qi
Honglan Zou
Yunhong Ding
Wei Luo
Junzheng Yang
spellingShingle Dan Qi
Honglan Zou
Yunhong Ding
Wei Luo
Junzheng Yang
Engineering Simulation Tests on Multiphase Flow in Middle- and High-Yield Slanted Well Bores
Energies
wellbore multiphase flow
inclined angle
liquid rate
gas rate
pressure drawdown model with new coefficients
author_facet Dan Qi
Honglan Zou
Yunhong Ding
Wei Luo
Junzheng Yang
author_sort Dan Qi
title Engineering Simulation Tests on Multiphase Flow in Middle- and High-Yield Slanted Well Bores
title_short Engineering Simulation Tests on Multiphase Flow in Middle- and High-Yield Slanted Well Bores
title_full Engineering Simulation Tests on Multiphase Flow in Middle- and High-Yield Slanted Well Bores
title_fullStr Engineering Simulation Tests on Multiphase Flow in Middle- and High-Yield Slanted Well Bores
title_full_unstemmed Engineering Simulation Tests on Multiphase Flow in Middle- and High-Yield Slanted Well Bores
title_sort engineering simulation tests on multiphase flow in middle- and high-yield slanted well bores
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Previous multiphase pipe flow tests have mainly been conducted in horizontal and vertical pipes, with few tests conducted on multiphase pipe flow under different inclined angles. In this study, in light of mid–high yield and highly deviated wells in the Middle East and on the basis of existent multiphase flow pressure research on well bores, multiphase pipe flow tests were conducted under different inclined angles, liquid rates, and gas rates. A pressure prediction model based on Mukherjee model, but with new coefficients and higher accuracy for well bores in the study block, was obtained. It was verified that the newly built pressure drawdown prediction model tallies better with experimental data, with an error of only 11.3%. The effect of inclination, output, and gas rate on the flow pattern, liquid holdup, and friction in the course of multiphase flow were analyzed comprehensively, and six kinds of classical flow regime maps were verified with this model. The results showed that for annular and slug flow, the Mukherjee flow pattern map had a higher accuracy of 100% and 80–100%, respectively. For transition flow, Duns and Ros flow pattern map had a higher accuracy of 46–66%.
topic wellbore multiphase flow
inclined angle
liquid rate
gas rate
pressure drawdown model with new coefficients
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/10/2591
work_keys_str_mv AT danqi engineeringsimulationtestsonmultiphaseflowinmiddleandhighyieldslantedwellbores
AT honglanzou engineeringsimulationtestsonmultiphaseflowinmiddleandhighyieldslantedwellbores
AT yunhongding engineeringsimulationtestsonmultiphaseflowinmiddleandhighyieldslantedwellbores
AT weiluo engineeringsimulationtestsonmultiphaseflowinmiddleandhighyieldslantedwellbores
AT junzhengyang engineeringsimulationtestsonmultiphaseflowinmiddleandhighyieldslantedwellbores
_version_ 1716801418801709056