Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose

Flat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roshan S Livingstone, David Chase, Anna Varghese, Paul V George, Oommen K George
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2015;volume=40;issue=1;spage=24;epage=28;aulast=Livingstone
id doaj-3be8acb31af0410292efe947763bc137
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3be8acb31af0410292efe947763bc1372020-11-24T20:54:53ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Physics0971-62031998-39132015-01-01401242810.4103/0971-6203.152241Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation doseRoshan S LivingstoneDavid ChaseAnna VarghesePaul V GeorgeOommen K GeorgeFlat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. This study intends to compare radiation doses from II and FPD systems for coronaryangiography (CAG) and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) performed in a tertiary referral center. Radiation doses were measured using dose area product (DAP) meter from patients who underwent CAG (n = 222) and PTCA (n = 75) performed using FPD angiography system. The DAP values from FPD were compared with earlier reported data using II systems from the same referral center where the study was conducted. The mean DAP values from FPD system for CAG and PTCA were 24.35 and 63.64 Gycm 2 and those from II system were 27.71 and 65.44 Gycm 2 . Transition from II to FPD system requires stringent dose optimization strategies right from the initial period of installation.http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2015;volume=40;issue=1;spage=24;epage=28;aulast=LivingstoneCardiology; flat panel; image intensifier; radiation dose
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roshan S Livingstone
David Chase
Anna Varghese
Paul V George
Oommen K George
spellingShingle Roshan S Livingstone
David Chase
Anna Varghese
Paul V George
Oommen K George
Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
Journal of Medical Physics
Cardiology; flat panel; image intensifier; radiation dose
author_facet Roshan S Livingstone
David Chase
Anna Varghese
Paul V George
Oommen K George
author_sort Roshan S Livingstone
title Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_short Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_full Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_fullStr Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_full_unstemmed Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_sort transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: impact of radiation dose
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Medical Physics
issn 0971-6203
1998-3913
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Flat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. This study intends to compare radiation doses from II and FPD systems for coronaryangiography (CAG) and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) performed in a tertiary referral center. Radiation doses were measured using dose area product (DAP) meter from patients who underwent CAG (n = 222) and PTCA (n = 75) performed using FPD angiography system. The DAP values from FPD were compared with earlier reported data using II systems from the same referral center where the study was conducted. The mean DAP values from FPD system for CAG and PTCA were 24.35 and 63.64 Gycm 2 and those from II system were 27.71 and 65.44 Gycm 2 . Transition from II to FPD system requires stringent dose optimization strategies right from the initial period of installation.
topic Cardiology; flat panel; image intensifier; radiation dose
url http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2015;volume=40;issue=1;spage=24;epage=28;aulast=Livingstone
work_keys_str_mv AT roshanslivingstone transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
AT davidchase transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
AT annavarghese transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
AT paulvgeorge transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
AT oommenkgeorge transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
_version_ 1716793396915339264