Debating the Capabilities of “Chinese Students” for Thinking Critically in Anglophone Universities

There are media and research reports of international students from the People’s Republic of China as being deficient in the capabilities for thinking critically. This paper argues for a shift in the frame for researching their critical thinking, moving the focus from the ethno-national label of “Ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siyi Lu, Michael Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-02-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/1/22
id doaj-3c1cc505e1b249c4b609951742137d7a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c1cc505e1b249c4b609951742137d7a2020-11-25T01:30:48ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022017-02-01712210.3390/educsci7010022educsci7010022Debating the Capabilities of “Chinese Students” for Thinking Critically in Anglophone UniversitiesSiyi Lu0Michael Singh1Centre for Educational Research, School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaCentre for Educational Research, School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, AustraliaThere are media and research reports of international students from the People’s Republic of China as being deficient in the capabilities for thinking critically. This paper argues for a shift in the frame for researching their critical thinking, moving the focus from the ethno-national label of “Chinese students” to “multilingual students” and their full linguistic repertoire. This opens up possibilities for exploring definitions of modes of critical thinking in Zhongwen (the official language of China) and English, and the importance of critical thinking in higher education in Australia, China and elsewhere. Attention then turns to constructions of “Chinese students” as uncritical, with explanations for their learning deficit including poor English language proficiency, lack of relevant knowledge, inappropriate assessment and deficiencies in China’s educational system. This paper concludes by suggesting research into post-monolingual education may find a theoretic-pedagogical framework that sees multilingual students use their full linguistic repertoire to develop modes of critical thinking while dealing with the tensions posed by English-only monolingual education.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/1/22critical thinkingChinese international studentsuncritical and disengagedmodes of critical thinking in Zhongwen
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siyi Lu
Michael Singh
spellingShingle Siyi Lu
Michael Singh
Debating the Capabilities of “Chinese Students” for Thinking Critically in Anglophone Universities
Education Sciences
critical thinking
Chinese international students
uncritical and disengaged
modes of critical thinking in Zhongwen
author_facet Siyi Lu
Michael Singh
author_sort Siyi Lu
title Debating the Capabilities of “Chinese Students” for Thinking Critically in Anglophone Universities
title_short Debating the Capabilities of “Chinese Students” for Thinking Critically in Anglophone Universities
title_full Debating the Capabilities of “Chinese Students” for Thinking Critically in Anglophone Universities
title_fullStr Debating the Capabilities of “Chinese Students” for Thinking Critically in Anglophone Universities
title_full_unstemmed Debating the Capabilities of “Chinese Students” for Thinking Critically in Anglophone Universities
title_sort debating the capabilities of “chinese students” for thinking critically in anglophone universities
publisher MDPI AG
series Education Sciences
issn 2227-7102
publishDate 2017-02-01
description There are media and research reports of international students from the People’s Republic of China as being deficient in the capabilities for thinking critically. This paper argues for a shift in the frame for researching their critical thinking, moving the focus from the ethno-national label of “Chinese students” to “multilingual students” and their full linguistic repertoire. This opens up possibilities for exploring definitions of modes of critical thinking in Zhongwen (the official language of China) and English, and the importance of critical thinking in higher education in Australia, China and elsewhere. Attention then turns to constructions of “Chinese students” as uncritical, with explanations for their learning deficit including poor English language proficiency, lack of relevant knowledge, inappropriate assessment and deficiencies in China’s educational system. This paper concludes by suggesting research into post-monolingual education may find a theoretic-pedagogical framework that sees multilingual students use their full linguistic repertoire to develop modes of critical thinking while dealing with the tensions posed by English-only monolingual education.
topic critical thinking
Chinese international students
uncritical and disengaged
modes of critical thinking in Zhongwen
url http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/7/1/22
work_keys_str_mv AT siyilu debatingthecapabilitiesofchinesestudentsforthinkingcriticallyinanglophoneuniversities
AT michaelsingh debatingthecapabilitiesofchinesestudentsforthinkingcriticallyinanglophoneuniversities
_version_ 1725089836220547072