A Comparative Study of Multilateration Methods for Single-Source Localization in Distributed Audio

In this article we analyze the state-of-the-art in multilateration - the family of localization methods enabled by the range difference observations. These methods are computationally efficient, signal-independent, and flexible with regards to the number of sensing nodes and their spatial arrangemen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sran Kitic, Clement Galutier, Gregory Pallone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FRUCT 2020-09-01
Series:Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.fruct.org/publications/acm27/files/Kit.pdf
id doaj-3c20c5603fd04ac4b8d4013fc3b2b348
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c20c5603fd04ac4b8d4013fc3b2b3482020-11-25T04:01:36ZengFRUCTProceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT2305-72542343-07372020-09-0127232833610.5281/zenodo.4026496A Comparative Study of Multilateration Methods for Single-Source Localization in Distributed AudioSran Kitic0Clement Galutier1Gregory Pallone2Orange, FranceOrange, FranceOrange, FranceIn this article we analyze the state-of-the-art in multilateration - the family of localization methods enabled by the range difference observations. These methods are computationally efficient, signal-independent, and flexible with regards to the number of sensing nodes and their spatial arrangement. However, the multilateration problem does not admit a closed-form solution in the general case, and the localization performance is conditioned on the accuracy of range difference estimates. For that reason, we consider a simplified use case where multiple distributed microphones capture the signal coming from a near field sound source, and discuss their robustness to the estimation errors. In addition to surveying the relevant bibliography, we present the results of a small-scale benchmark of few ""mainstream"" multilateration algorithms, based on an in-house Room Impulse Response dataset.https://www.fruct.org/publications/acm27/files/Kit.pdfmultilaterationlocalizationdistributedtdoaarray
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sran Kitic
Clement Galutier
Gregory Pallone
spellingShingle Sran Kitic
Clement Galutier
Gregory Pallone
A Comparative Study of Multilateration Methods for Single-Source Localization in Distributed Audio
Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
multilateration
localization
distributed
tdoa
array
author_facet Sran Kitic
Clement Galutier
Gregory Pallone
author_sort Sran Kitic
title A Comparative Study of Multilateration Methods for Single-Source Localization in Distributed Audio
title_short A Comparative Study of Multilateration Methods for Single-Source Localization in Distributed Audio
title_full A Comparative Study of Multilateration Methods for Single-Source Localization in Distributed Audio
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Multilateration Methods for Single-Source Localization in Distributed Audio
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Multilateration Methods for Single-Source Localization in Distributed Audio
title_sort comparative study of multilateration methods for single-source localization in distributed audio
publisher FRUCT
series Proceedings of the XXth Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT
issn 2305-7254
2343-0737
publishDate 2020-09-01
description In this article we analyze the state-of-the-art in multilateration - the family of localization methods enabled by the range difference observations. These methods are computationally efficient, signal-independent, and flexible with regards to the number of sensing nodes and their spatial arrangement. However, the multilateration problem does not admit a closed-form solution in the general case, and the localization performance is conditioned on the accuracy of range difference estimates. For that reason, we consider a simplified use case where multiple distributed microphones capture the signal coming from a near field sound source, and discuss their robustness to the estimation errors. In addition to surveying the relevant bibliography, we present the results of a small-scale benchmark of few ""mainstream"" multilateration algorithms, based on an in-house Room Impulse Response dataset.
topic multilateration
localization
distributed
tdoa
array
url https://www.fruct.org/publications/acm27/files/Kit.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT srankitic acomparativestudyofmultilaterationmethodsforsinglesourcelocalizationindistributedaudio
AT clementgalutier acomparativestudyofmultilaterationmethodsforsinglesourcelocalizationindistributedaudio
AT gregorypallone acomparativestudyofmultilaterationmethodsforsinglesourcelocalizationindistributedaudio
AT srankitic comparativestudyofmultilaterationmethodsforsinglesourcelocalizationindistributedaudio
AT clementgalutier comparativestudyofmultilaterationmethodsforsinglesourcelocalizationindistributedaudio
AT gregorypallone comparativestudyofmultilaterationmethodsforsinglesourcelocalizationindistributedaudio
_version_ 1724446301910728704