Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo

This essay proposes the concept of ‘anscription’, and employs it to re-think some of the typical valences of inscription in media theory. The word is derived from the German anschreiben, which can simply mean, ‘to write up’, but also refers to the specific act...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nathaniel Zetter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Humanities
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/1/5
id doaj-3c41ac77fc05411d824f4c3aeb9c0ec8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3c41ac77fc05411d824f4c3aeb9c0ec82020-11-24T23:33:46ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872019-01-0181510.3390/h8010005h8010005Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLilloNathaniel Zetter0Peterhouse, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1RD, UKThis essay proposes the concept of ‘anscription’, and employs it to re-think some of the typical valences of inscription in media theory. The word is derived from the German anschreiben, which can simply mean, ‘to write up’, but also refers to the specific act, and the set of social relations that come into place, when one writes something up on a blackboard. Not quite encompassed by inscription, it offers an essential counterpart to the term for media-oriented thinkers. The essay draws out this corresponding function through readings of three imagined (but not-quite-imaginary) media, across which emerges a dialectic in the cultural imaginary of inscription. The first comes from the mathematician Norbert Wiener’s description of a mechanism that would translate written text into tactile impressions; the second, from Jacques Derrida’s historical framing of the project of deconstruction in relation to writing systems; and the third, from a thirty-two-page description of an American football game in Don DeLillo’s 1972 novel, End Zone. Each will offer a different exemplification of the function termed ‘anscription’. Just as significantly, each example presents this function in relation to the technical possibilities of media and articulates it through a theory of the body that is entangled with writing.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/1/5InscriptionmediacyberneticsdeconstructionWienerDerridaDeLillo
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathaniel Zetter
spellingShingle Nathaniel Zetter
Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo
Humanities
Inscription
media
cybernetics
deconstruction
Wiener
Derrida
DeLillo
author_facet Nathaniel Zetter
author_sort Nathaniel Zetter
title Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo
title_short Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo
title_full Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo
title_fullStr Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo
title_full_unstemmed Inscription and ‘Anscription’: Surface and System in Cybernetics, Deconstruction, and Don DeLillo
title_sort inscription and ‘anscription’: surface and system in cybernetics, deconstruction, and don delillo
publisher MDPI AG
series Humanities
issn 2076-0787
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This essay proposes the concept of ‘anscription’, and employs it to re-think some of the typical valences of inscription in media theory. The word is derived from the German anschreiben, which can simply mean, ‘to write up’, but also refers to the specific act, and the set of social relations that come into place, when one writes something up on a blackboard. Not quite encompassed by inscription, it offers an essential counterpart to the term for media-oriented thinkers. The essay draws out this corresponding function through readings of three imagined (but not-quite-imaginary) media, across which emerges a dialectic in the cultural imaginary of inscription. The first comes from the mathematician Norbert Wiener’s description of a mechanism that would translate written text into tactile impressions; the second, from Jacques Derrida’s historical framing of the project of deconstruction in relation to writing systems; and the third, from a thirty-two-page description of an American football game in Don DeLillo’s 1972 novel, End Zone. Each will offer a different exemplification of the function termed ‘anscription’. Just as significantly, each example presents this function in relation to the technical possibilities of media and articulates it through a theory of the body that is entangled with writing.
topic Inscription
media
cybernetics
deconstruction
Wiener
Derrida
DeLillo
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanielzetter inscriptionandanscriptionsurfaceandsystemincyberneticsdeconstructionanddondelillo
_version_ 1725530845170630656